Re: Finally time for IPvn support

2004-10-05 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 05 Oct 2004 11:41:48 -0400, Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: jaltman> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: jaltman> jaltman> > gianni> If I think hard enough, I could probably think of ways that jaltman> > gianni> this would break things. jaltman> >

Re: Finally time for IPvn support

2004-10-05 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: gianni> If I think hard enough, I could probably think of ways that gianni> this would break things. Well, let's see, we have two places where this is relevant. One is the simple {host}:{port} combination, the other is the URL http://{host}:{port}/... In both

Re: Finally time for IPvn support

2004-10-05 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 05 Oct 2004 06:31:43 -0700, Gianni Mariani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: gianni> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: gianni> gianni> >hyc> It would be best to avoid any non-standard formats... gianni> > gianni> >Thanks! Decision made (and I'll extend it a bit

Re: Finally time for IPvn support

2004-10-05 Thread Gianni Mariani
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: hyc> It would be best to avoid any non-standard formats... Thanks! Decision made (and I'll extend it a bit to allow "[" and "]" around IPv4 addresses and host names as well, mostly because I'm lazy). If I think hard enough, I could probably think of ways tha

Re: Finally time for IPvn support

2004-10-05 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 05 Oct 2004 02:41:24 -0700, Howard Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: hyc> The "Cisco" solution *is* the standard solution: hyc> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2732.txt hyc> hyc> It would be best to avoid any non-standard formats... Thanks! Decision made (and I'll

Re: Finally time for IPvn support

2004-10-05 Thread Howard Chu
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 04 Oct 2004 15:33:46 -0700, Lev Walkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: vlm> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: [...] vlm> > So, I'm looking for proposals on a new syntax to separate IP address vlm> > from port number. Any sug

Re: Finally time for IPvn support

2004-10-05 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 04 Oct 2004 15:33:46 -0700, Lev Walkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: vlm> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: [...] vlm> > So, I'm looking for proposals on a new syntax to separate IP address vlm> > from port number. Any suggestion? vlm> vlm> This is how Cisc

Re: Finally time for IPvn support

2004-10-04 Thread Howard Chu
Lev Walkin wrote: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: Hi, I've just been hacking around a little bit to add IPv6 capability, and I thought of syntax for host and port specifications. As it is now, the syntax used a little everywhere in OpenSSL is {host}:{port}. Unfortunately, if we're to support

Re: Finally time for IPvn support

2004-10-04 Thread Lev Walkin
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: Hi, I've just been hacking around a little bit to add IPv6 capability, and I thought of syntax for host and port specifications. As it is now, the syntax used a little everywhere in OpenSSL is {host}:{port}. Unfortunately, if we're to support IPv6 numeric addre

Finally time for IPvn support

2004-10-04 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Hi, I've just been hacking around a little bit to add IPv6 capability, and I thought of syntax for host and port specifications. As it is now, the syntax used a little everywhere in OpenSSL is {host}:{port}. Unfortunately, if we're to support IPv6 numeric addresses, I find myself in a little bit