"William A. Rowe Jr." writes:
> On 3/14/2012 12:27 PM, Bruce Stephens wrote:
>> open...@master.openssl.org (OpenSSL) writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> o Preliminary FIPS capability for unvalidated 2.0 FIPS module.
>>
>> I note that #2741 appears not to be resolved, so if you build on Windows
>>
On Thursday 15 March 2012 03:19:07 Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> i'm not looking for downstream workarounds here but rather the right
> >> answer. is openssl-1.0.1 expected to be ABI compatible with
> >> openssl-1.0.0 ?
> >
>
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> i'm not looking for downstream workarounds here but rather the right answer.
>>
>> is openssl-1.0.1 expected to be ABI compatible with openssl-1.0.0 ?
>
> Yes. In brief the versioning scheme introduced with 1.0.0 is:
>
On 3/14/2012 12:27 PM, Bruce Stephens wrote:
> open...@master.openssl.org (OpenSSL) writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> o Preliminary FIPS capability for unvalidated 2.0 FIPS module.
>
> I note that #2741 appears not to be resolved, so if you build on Windows
> and use --with-fipsdir=... then that prob
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 19:23:14 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i'm not looking for downstream workarounds here but rather the right
> > answer. is openssl-1.0.1 expected to be ABI compatible with
> > openssl-1.0.0 ?
>
> Yes. In brief the versioning
Zoltan.Arpadffy> Z
Zoltan.Arpadffy>
Zoltan.Arpadffy> -Original Message-
Zoltan.Arpadffy> From: OpenSSL [mailto:open...@master.openssl.org]
Zoltan.Arpadffy> Sent: den 14 mars 2012 16:09
Zoltan.Arpadffy> To: openssl-annou...@master.openssl.org;
openssl-...@master.openssl.org; o
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Iain Morgan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:09:22 -0500, OpenSSL wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >
> >We consider OpenSSL 1.0.1 to be the best version of OpenSSL
> >available and we strongly recommend that users of older versions
> >upgrade as
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:09:22 -0500, OpenSSL wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
>We consider OpenSSL 1.0.1 to be the best version of OpenSSL
>available and we strongly recommend that users of older versions
>upgrade as soon as possible. OpenSSL 1.0.1 is available for
>
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> i'm not looking for downstream workarounds here but rather the right answer.
> is openssl-1.0.1 expected to be ABI compatible with openssl-1.0.0 ?
>
Yes. In brief the versioning scheme introduced with 1.0.0 is:
Changes to last letter: security a
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 17:18:19 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 02:30:29PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:25:32 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 14 March 2012 11:09:22 OpenSSL wrote:
> >
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Bruce Stephens wrote:
> open...@master.openssl.org (OpenSSL) writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > o Preliminary FIPS capability for unvalidated 2.0 FIPS module.
>
> I note that #2741 appears not to be resolved, so if you build on Windows
> and use --with-fipsdir=... then that pro
open...@master.openssl.org (OpenSSL) writes:
[...]
> o Preliminary FIPS capability for unvalidated 2.0 FIPS module.
I note that #2741 appears not to be resolved, so if you build on Windows
and use --with-fipsdir=... then that probably won't work.
[...]
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 02:30:29PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:25:32 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 14 March 2012 11:09:22 OpenSSL wrote:
> > > >OpenSSL version 1.0.1 released
> > > >=
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:36:09 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:25:32 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 14 March 2012 11:09:22 OpenSSL wrote:
> > > > >Ope
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 19:36 +0100, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:25:32 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 14 March 2012 11:09:22 OpenSSL wrote:
> > > > >
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:25:32 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 14 March 2012 11:09:22 OpenSSL wrote:
> > > >OpenSSL version 1.0.1 released
> > > >===
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:25:32 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 March 2012 11:09:22 OpenSSL wrote:
> > >OpenSSL version 1.0.1 released
> > >===
> > >
> > >http://www.openssl.org/source/ex
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 March 2012 11:09:22 OpenSSL wrote:
> >OpenSSL version 1.0.1 released
> >===
> >
> >http://www.openssl.org/source/exp/CHANGES.
> >
> >The most significant changes are:
> >
> > o TL
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 11:09:22 OpenSSL wrote:
>OpenSSL version 1.0.1 released
>===
>
>http://www.openssl.org/source/exp/CHANGES.
>
>The most significant changes are:
>
> o TLS/DTLS heartbeat support.
> o SCTP support.
> o RFC
> Unfortunately, it is still not possible to build on VAX architecture,
> because the "[openssl.org #2653] [BUG] OpenSSL 1.0.1 OpenVMS issues
> on VAX" is sill not solved.
http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@openssl.org/msg29956.html
X" is sill not
solved.
Thank you.
Regards,
Z
-Original Message-
From: OpenSSL [mailto:open...@master.openssl.org]
Sent: den 14 mars 2012 16:09
To: openssl-annou...@master.openssl.org; openssl-...@master.openssl.org;
openssl-us...@master.openssl.org
Subject: OpenSSL 1.0.1 released
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 1.0.1 released
===
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of
version 1.0.1 of our open source to
22 matches
Mail list logo
