Re: [openssl.org #243] OpenSSL 0.9.6g fail on IBM OS/390

2002-11-14 Thread
Richard, Thank you for your response. sjm Message History From: Richard Levitte via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED]@serv01.aet.tu-cottbus.de on 11/14/2002 12:54 AM CET Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] DELEGATED

RE: [openssl.org #243] OpenSSL 0.9.6g fail on IBM OS/390

2002-11-14 Thread Howard Chu
I don't recall what happened to the other email thread, but I also submitted patches for that issue as well. The idea is to keep the OpenSSL internal data structures in ASCII. So I patched a couple of the conf routines to translate EBCDIC (read from a config file) into ASCII, etc. You need to do

Re: [openssl.org #243] OpenSSL 0.9.6g fail on IBM OS/390

2002-08-31 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Howard Chu wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Howard Chu The output from testca is still a little dodgy, there are a few certificate fields that are printed in ASCII that need to be translated to

RE: [openssl.org #243] OpenSSL 0.9.6g fail on IBM OS/390

2002-08-31 Thread Howard Chu
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dr. Stephen Henson On Fri, Aug 30, 2002, Howard Chu wrote: The output from testca is still a little dodgy, there are a few certificate fields that are printed in ASCII that need to be translated

RE: [openssl.org #243] OpenSSL 0.9.6g fail on IBM OS/390

2002-08-30 Thread Howard Chu
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Howard Chu The output from testca is still a little dodgy, there are a few certificate fields that are printed in ASCII that need to be translated to EBCDIC for appearance's sake. But that's simple to

RE: [openssl.org #243] OpenSSL 0.9.6g fail on IBM OS/390

2002-08-30 Thread Howard Chu
Damn, sent an incomplete diff for crypto/x509v3/v3_utl.c. Sorry about that. -- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. Director, Highland Sun http://www.symas.com http://highlandsun.com/hyc Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support -Original Message-

RE: [openssl.org #243] OpenSSL 0.9.6g fail on IBM OS/390

2002-08-29 Thread
Development and Support -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Howard Chu Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 3:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [openssl.org #243] OpenSSL 0.9.6g fail on IBM OS/390 Removing -O from CFLAGS and recompiling

RE: [openssl.org #243] OpenSSL 0.9.6g fail on IBM OS/390

2002-08-28 Thread Howard Chu
Development and Support -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Howard Chu Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 3:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [openssl.org #243] OpenSSL 0.9.6g fail on IBM OS/390 Removing -O from CFLAGS and recompiling

RE: [openssl.org #243] OpenSSL 0.9.6g fail on IBM OS/390

2002-08-28 Thread Howard Chu
Ok, so after getting past the previous problems, the testca script failed. Fixing this last problem allows the tests to successfully run to completion. The problem was that the ca app didn't like the result it got from ASN1_PRINTABLE_type() (apps/ca.c, line 1586) because the ASN1_PRINTABLE_type

RE: [openssl.org #243] OpenSSL 0.9.6g fail on IBM OS/390

2002-08-28 Thread Howard Chu
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Howard Chu Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 5:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [openssl.org #243] OpenSSL 0.9.6g fail on IBM OS/390 Ok, so after getting past the previous problems, the testca script