...@openssl.org] On
Behalf Of Bhat, Jayalakshmi Manjunath
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:17 AM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: RE: SHA-256 and SHA-512 doubts in OpenSSL
Hi Andy,
I will check if I can get a right copy. Do you have any link that directs me
to correct copy?
Regards
Jaya
: [openssl-dev] Re: SHA-256 and SHA-512 doubts in OpenSSL
Same here.
Also with
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips180-2/fips180-2withchangenotice.pdf
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips180-3/fips180-3_final.pdf and
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips180-4/fips-180-4.pdf
and SHA-512 doubts in OpenSSL
Same here.
Also with
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips180-2/fips180-2withchangenotice.pdf
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips180-3/fips180-3_final.pdf and
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips180-4/fips-180-4.pdf are OK.
--
Erwann ABALEA
Le 26/06/2012 18:24, Bhat, Jayalakshmi Manjunath a écrit :
One more question CHANGES document in OpenSSL 1.0.1 stats SHA-224 supported as
per FIPS 180-2, but SHA-224 appears to be available only in FIPS 180-3. So
shouldn’t it be as per FIPS 180-3 standard?
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/
> I tested 2 sample test explained in the FIPS
> 180-2 and 180-3 documents with OpenSSL 1.0.1 document and test output
> matched in both the cases. But the CH was different in FIPS 180-2
> than FIPS 180-3. So I was wondering how output can be same
> irrespective of CH difference.
There is no way
[mailto:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org] On
Behalf Of Andy Polyakov
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:19 PM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: SHA-256 and SHA-512 doubts in OpenSSL
> I was just able to open the link below and the entire document looked okay.
I observe spaces in places where ~ should
: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: SHA-256 and SHA-512 doubts in OpenSSL
> I was just able to open the link below and the entire document looked okay.
I observe spaces in places where ~ should be in Ch(), not only in SHA256, but
in all of them. And Figure 1 on page 3 is mostly em
Same here.
Also with
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips180-2/fips180-2withchangenotice.pdf
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips180-3/fips180-3_final.pdf and
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips180-4/fips-180-4.pdf are OK.
--
Erwann ABALEA
-
nocticonsiliophorisme: e
Polyakov
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:07 PM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: SHA-256 and SHA-512 doubts in OpenSSL
> Thanks a lot for the quick reply. Sorry to interrupt you with one more
> question. Is
> http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips180-2/fips180-2.pdf this
> n
> I was just able to open the link below and the entire document looked okay.
I observe spaces in places where ~ should be in Ch(), not only in
SHA256, but in all of them. And Figure 1 on page 3 is mostly empty...
__
OpenSSL Proje
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org] On
Behalf Of Andy Polyakov
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 8:37 AM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: SHA-256 and SHA-512 doubts in OpenSSL
> Thanks a lot for the quick reply. Sorry
> Thanks a lot for the quick reply. Sorry to interrupt you with one
> more question. Is
> http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips180-2/fips180-2.pdf this
> not the right document?
It appears to be right place, but the document is corrupted. I have a
copy from 2004 that says (x&y)^(~x&z). My PD
-...@openssl.org] On
Behalf Of Andy Polyakov
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 8:24 PM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: SHA-256 and SHA-512 doubts in OpenSSL
> Thanks for the reply. I am trying to understand whether FIPS 180-2 or
> FIPS 180-3 is supported in OpenSSL 1.0.1. CHANGES document in O
> Thanks for the reply. I am trying to understand whether FIPS 180-2 or
> FIPS 180-3 is supported in OpenSSL 1.0.1. CHANGES document in
> OpenSSL claims the support for FIPS 180-2. However CH is defined in
> SHA-256 is #define Ch(x,y,z) (((x) & (y)) ^ ((~(x)) & (z))) in
> SHA-256.c . This is
d implementation supported in OpenSSL 1.0.1.
Regards
Jaya
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org] On
Behalf Of Andy Polyakov
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 5:51 PM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: SHA-256 and SHA-512 doubts in O
> I have couple of questions like,
>
> 1.What is FIPS standard OpenSSL 1.0.1 library following. CHANGES claims
> the support for FIPS180-2?
What is the concern? That post-FIPS180-2 is not supported? Well, if you
can point out essential difference in specification for algorithms in
question
16 matches
Mail list logo
