On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 04:47:27PM -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:41:54PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >
> > One of my problems with openssl is that changing compile time
> > options break the ABI. And people don't seem to be willing to
> > change this.
> >
> > Wit
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:41:54PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> One of my problems with openssl is that changing compile time
> options break the ABI. And people don't seem to be willing to
> change this.
>
> With every version I upload to Debian I do check for possible
> problems before I uplo
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 03:56:53PM -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:01:01PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >
> > I'm planning on uploading a version based on 1.0.0 to Debian
> > soon. And I would like to keep the current soname for the
> > rest of the release cycle. Th
Hi,
I'm wondering what your plan is with version numbering and
changing sonames for future versions of the library. With
the 1.0.0 release you made it libssl.so.1.0.0 (and
libcrypto.so.1.0.0).
Current CVS HEAD seems to be having 1.1.0 as part of it's soname,
OpenSSL_1_0_1-stable still has 1.0.0.
