On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 09:01:53AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Log:
> The correct PERL interpreter is passed via commandline.
> RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/apps/Makefile.ssl,v
> retrieving revision 1.100.2.2
> retrieving revision 1.100.2.3
> diff -u -r1.100.2.2 -r1.100.2.3
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 02:47:24PM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 09:01:53AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Log:
> > The correct PERL interpreter is passed via commandline.
>
> > RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/apps/Makefile.ssl,v
> > retrieving revision 1.1
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 03:15:18PM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 02:47:24PM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 09:01:53AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Log:
> > > The correct PERL interpreter is passed via commandline.
> >
> > > RCS f
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 6 Jun 2002
11:17:18 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Lutz.Jaenicke> The correct solution would therefore be, to pass all
Lutz.Jaenicke> options back from withing test/Makefile (which would
Lutz.Jaenicke> call crypto/ and ssl/ builds in case li
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 11:29:13AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 6 Jun 2002
>11:17:18 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Lutz.Jaenicke> The correct solution would therefore be, to pass all
> Lutz.Jaenicke> options back from w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
> Index: t_x509.c
> ===
> RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/crypto/asn1/t_x509.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.31
> retrieving revision 1.32
> diff -u -r1.31 -r1.32
> --- t_x509.c2002/08/07
Good catch, thanks! I just applied a change.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 13 Nov 2002 20:04:19
+0100, Nils Larsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
nlarsch> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nlarsch> ...
nlarsch> > Index: t_x509.c
nlarsch> >
