Ulf Möller wrote:
>
> > If people want to develop or use snapshots, then they should have Perl.
>
> I don't think we should make it more difficult for people to try the
> snapshots. There already are enough problems that are only noticed
> in the release versions.
>
> I mean, we even have the m
> If people want to develop or use snapshots, then they should have Perl.
I don't think we should make it more difficult for people to try the
snapshots. There already are enough problems that are only noticed
in the release versions.
I mean, we even have the makedepend output in the CVS, even t
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>
> ben> Are you saying Perl doesn't run on VMS?
>
> Perl runs on VMS, but isn't commonly installed (yet). I did a poll
> right after the release of 0.9.4, when I noticed the missing
> obj_dat.h, and the common response from most people in the VMS
> communit
ben> Are you saying Perl doesn't run on VMS?
Perl runs on VMS, but isn't commonly installed (yet). I did a poll
right after the release of 0.9.4, when I noticed the missing
obj_dat.h, and the common response from most people in the VMS
community was that it would be quite annoying to install Per
> > Errr ... why?
that was my first reaction too:-)
>
> Because it fails so often (we've had one example for Windows and one
> example for Unix this week),
but what happens anyway?
> and because VMS needs it (or some other
> solution) anyway.
as well as MacOS...
andy.
___
Ulf Möller wrote:
>
> > Errr ... why?
>
> Because it fails so often (we've had one example for Windows and one
> example for Unix this week), and because VMS needs it (or some other
> solution) anyway.
Are you saying Perl doesn't run on VMS?
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
> Errr ... why?
Because it fails so often (we've had one example for Windows and one
example for Unix this week), and because VMS needs it (or some other
solution) anyway.
__
OpenSSL Project http:/
ulf> Maybe we should put obj_dat.h back under CVS control, fix the dots in
ulf> objects.h as Anonymous proposed some time ago, and run obj_dat.pl as
ulf> part of "make update".
ulf>
ulf> Any objections?
No. None at all. Nope. Please do :-).
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL
Ulf Möller wrote:
>
> > obj_dat.c: In function `OBJ_nid2obj':
> > obj_dat.c:263: `NUM_NID' undeclared (first use this function)
>
> Maybe we should put obj_dat.h back under CVS control, fix the dots in
> objects.h as Anonymous proposed some time ago, and run obj_dat.pl as
> part of "make update"
> obj_dat.c: In function `OBJ_nid2obj':
> obj_dat.c:263: `NUM_NID' undeclared (first use this function)
Maybe we should put obj_dat.h back under CVS control, fix the dots in
objects.h as Anonymous proposed some time ago, and run obj_dat.pl as
part of "make update".
Any objections?
__
>
./config --prefix=/home/dburnham/usr/local --openssldir=/home/dburnham/usr/l
ocal/openssl \
>make
making all in crypto...
making all in crypto/md2...
making all in crypto/md5...
making all in crypto/sha...
making all in crypto/mdc2...
making all in crypto/hmac...
making all in crypto/ripe
11 matches
Mail list logo