[openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2014-09-10 Thread Rich Salz via RT
This was obsoleted by ticket 913, which I closed as something too old that we're not going to do. So closing this. Having said that (twice, actually), a PKCS11 ENGINE would be a cool thing to have. -- Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org _

[openssl.org #11] pkcs11 engine for openssl 0.9.7d

2004-07-08 Thread via RT
update for openssl 0.9.7d [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bull TrustWay __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager

[openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2003-10-28 Thread via RT
update & bug corrections for the pkcs#11 engine (0.9.7c) please take care to update the openssl contributions page by this new patch. regards __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development M

[openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2003-10-28 Thread via RT
update & bug corrections for the pkcs#11 engine (0.9.6k) please take care to update the openssl contributions page by this new patch. regards __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development M

[openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2003-06-11 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
And oh, it might be interesting to port this to use the new STORE type in 0.9.8-dev, which supports key generation... [levitte - Thu Jun 12 03:27:57 2003]: > I've added the two latest contributions to > http://www.openssl.org/contrib/. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2003-06-11 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
I've added the two latest contributions to http://www.openssl.org/contrib/. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List

[openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2003-01-30 Thread via RT
__ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Bull TrustWay R&D, France > http://www.servers.bull.com/trustway > __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List

[openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2003-01-30 Thread via RT
Hello Richard, > Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > > It's unfortunate that cryptoki.h is GPLd, or I would put it in our contribution area. > > GPL is not compatible with the OpenSSL license. Is it possible to get a different cryptoki.h? I got the original cryptoki.h which is not GPLd from RSA

[openssl.org #11] pkcs11 engine for openssl (0.9.7-beta6)

2002-12-17 Thread via RT
This is the last patch which implement a PKCS#11 engine in openssl 0.9.7. It has been tested with openssl commands, secure apache web server 1.3.27 + mod_ssl 2.8.12 and openca 0.9.0 on Linux with a CC2000 Bull TrustWay cryptographic card offering PKCS#11 interface. Openssl commands tests have b

[openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-12-16 Thread via RT
The new patch for pkcs#11 engine on openssl 0.9.7 delivered today to RT/openssl corrects compile problem in windows platform. Thanks to your advice! Afchine Madjlessi [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project

[openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-12-16 Thread via RT
The new patch for pkcs#11 engine on openssl 0.9.7 delivered today to RT/openssl corrects compile problem in windows platform. Thanks to your advice! Afchine Madjlessi [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project

Re: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-12-16 Thread afchine madjlessi via RT
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 9:47 AM Subject: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl > > It's so nice that someone provided pkcs11 enginge patch. >

Re: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-12-16 Thread afchine madjlessi
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 9:47 AM Subject: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl > > It's so nice that someone provided pkcs11 enginge patch. >

[openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-12-16 Thread via RT
#x27; : return code '0x2' Stop. Could anyone fix this problem? Thanks very much... [guest - Fri Dec 13 15:23:00 2002]: > Here you have the patch for pkcs11 engine for openssl 0.9.7 beta5 > This engine has been tested with apache 1.3.27 mod_ssl 2.8.12 and the > CC2000 Bull Tr

[openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-12-16 Thread via RT
figure VC-WIN32 => OK 2. ms\do_ms 3. nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak [guest - Fri Dec 13 15:23:00 2002]: > Here you have the patch for pkcs11 engine for openssl 0.9.7 beta5 > This engine has been tested with apache 1.3.27 mod_ssl 2.8.12 and the > CC2000 Bull TrustWay hardware. If needed, I

[openssl.org #11] pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-12-13 Thread via RT
here is the patch for mod_ssl Afchine Madjlessi __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bull TrustWay R&D http://www.servers.bull.com/trustway __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl

[openssl.org #11] pkcs11 engine for openssl 0.9.7

2002-12-13 Thread via RT
Here you have the patch for pkcs11 engine for openssl 0.9.7 beta5 This engine has been tested with apache 1.3.27 mod_ssl 2.8.12 and the CC2000 Bull TrustWay hardware. If needed, I can provide also the patch to use with mod_ssl and some tools to create and sign certificate requests. In this new

[openssl.org #11] TrustWay pkcs11 engine for openssl for openssl-engine-0.9.6.h

2002-12-13 Thread via RT
Please find attached the patch file for pkcs11 engine for openssl- engine-0.9.6h. I will post the patch for openssl-0.9.7-beta5 in a separate mail. Afchine Madjlessi __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bull TrustWay R&D http://www.servers.bull.com/trus

[openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-09-09 Thread via RT
You can find attached the Bull Trustway PKCS#11 patch for openssl- engine-0.9.6g. Afchine Madjlessi __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bull - Trustway R&D - Networking & Security http://www.servers.bull.com/trustway _

[openssl.org #11] pkcs11 engine for openssl (Bull trustway)

2002-09-09 Thread via RT
I've made some improvements in the Bull trustway pkcs#11 engine to be more generic. In this release, PKCS#11 functions are called through the functions list rather than specific calls directly to PKCS#11 functions. So it is possible to point it to any PKCS#11 shared library renamed libpkcs11.

[openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-06-18 Thread Geoff Thorpe via RT
Hi there, Just a couple of thoughts on this ticket [#11].. [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu May 30 17:39:08 2002]: > "Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > 1. could this engine be considered a general PKCS#11 engine, or are > > there specific ties to Trustway. I'd prefer to see a

Re: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-06-10 Thread afchine madjlessi
> > "Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2. Those extra functions in the RSA method, are they really needed? > > I understand that they provide a lot of automagic things, but then > > it should be added in the ENGINE framework as something that would > > be potentially available

Re: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-05-31 Thread afchine madjlessi
Zoran, could you please send me source code of Eracom PKCS11 engine for openssl? regards __[EMAIL PROTECTED]Bull Technologies -Trustway R&D - Networking & Securityhttp://www.servers.bull.com/trustway     - Original Message - From:

Re: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-05-31 Thread afchine madjlessi
"Steven Bade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > We generate all keys within our "tokens" Some tokens such as the > 4758 keep all the token objects within the secure boundary, and rely on > the proper PKCS#11 attributes to control selection, keys generated stay > within the FIPS4 boundary. Others

Re: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-05-31 Thread Zoran Radenkovic
>> "Steven Bade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> I'm not sure about the second question, but we found that the eracom >> engine submission was much more generic.   When one of my co-workers >> tried to get our PKCS#11 libraries (openCryptoki) used by the Trustway >> module there were many issues, as well as

Re: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-05-30 Thread Steven Bade
We generate all keys within our "tokens" Some tokens such as the 4758 keep all the token objects within the secure boundary, and rely on the proper PKCS#11 attributes to control selection, keys generated stay within the FIPS4 boundary. Others which are accelerators, still use the PKCS#11

Re: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-05-30 Thread afchine madjlessi
"Steven Bade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not sure about the second question, but we found that the eracom > engine submission was much more generic. When one of my co-workers > tried to get our PKCS#11 libraries (openCryptoki) used by the Trustway > module there were many issues, as wel

Re: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-05-30 Thread
"Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I've just started looking at this, and I've got a couple of > questions: > > 1. could this engine be considered a general PKCS#11 engine, or are > there specific ties to Trustway. I'd prefer to see a general > PKCS#11 engine. > This engi

Re: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-05-30 Thread afchine madjlessi
"Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I've just started looking at this, and I've got a couple of > questions: > > 1. could this engine be considered a general PKCS#11 engine, or are > there specific ties to Trustway. I'd prefer to see a general > PKCS#11 engine. > This engin

Re: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-05-30 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 30 May 2002 08:01:55 -0500, Steven Bade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: sbade> I'm not sure about the second question, but we found that the eracom sbade> engine submission was much more generic. When one of my co-workers sbade> tried to get our PKCS#11 libra

Re: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-05-30 Thread Steven Bade
I'm not sure about the second question, but we found that the eracom engine submission was much more generic. When one of my co-workers tried to get our PKCS#11 libraries (openCryptoki) used by the Trustway module there were many issues, as well as specific calls directly to PKCs#11 function

[openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-05-30 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
I've just started looking at this, and I've got a couple of questions: 1. could this engine be considered a general PKCS#11 engine, or are there specific ties to Trustway. I'd prefer to see a general PKCS#11 engine. 2. Those extra functions in the RSA method, are they really needed? I und

pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-04-23 Thread afchine madjlessi
Based on openssl-engine-0.9.6c, we have developed a new engine which allowsopenssl applications and Apache-mod_ssl servers to use through a PKCS#11interface the security functions provided by the Bull trustway cc2000 cryptographiccard, taking advantage of key storage in secure memory and acc