From: Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lutz.Jaenicke> I did some more experiments and also saw the problems.
Lutz.Jaenicke>
Lutz.Jaenicke> They occur when using a 0.9.6-beta client to connect to
Lutz.Jaenicke> 0.9.5a and 0.9.6-beta servers.
Lutz.Jaenicke> They also occur when using a 0.9.5a cli
From: "Watson, Scott E" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
scott.watson> > make install
scott.watson>
scott.watson> I get the following results:
[...]
scott.watson> making all in tools...
scott.watson> Cannot create directory /usr/local/ssl: Permission denied
scott.watson> *** Error code 13
scott.watson> make:
> "Ben" == Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > See my state_machine demo for a main loop that should work... if
>> > it doesn't, I'd like to know about it...
>>
>> Which is where? Couldn't find it in OpenSSL-0.9.5a.
Ben> Its in the snapshots, and in 0.9.
Thank you for the informative answer.
Since MS VC++ and boundschecker notices these leaks, it would be nice to
have a "cleanup" routine which could be called at the end of the app.
- Martin
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTEC
From: "Martin Skinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
N8Schwaermer> Thank you for the informative answer.
YW
N8Schwaermer> Since MS VC++ and boundschecker notices these leaks, it
N8Schwaermer> would be nice to have a "cleanup" routine which could be
N8Schwaermer> called at the end of the app.
I've been t
Hi
I've installed OpenSSL, and I want to use "/dev/random" device as source of
unpredictable data.
But "/dev/random" is a blocking device source.
Can I configure OpenSSL to work with a blocking device source ?
I'm using :
OpenSSL 0.9.5
Solaris SunOS 5.8
Thanks for all.
If I am using SSL 128 Bit Encryption considered "retail" encryption by the
federal government?
We desire to use it in an application where encrypted data is transported
from a ASP in the USA to Mexico and back, however we are unsure of the legal
implications can you please help or send us to some
> If I am using SSL 128 Bit Encryption considered "retail" encryption by the
> federal government?
> We desire to use it in an application where encrypted data is transported
> from a ASP in the USA to Mexico and back, however we are unsure of the legal
> implications can you please help or send
Hi there,
I was compiling a 64-bit OpenSSL(0.9.5a) with BSAFE
Crypto-C on a IA-64 machine running HPUX. I used a
patch file supplied by Mark Bixby that enables OpenSSL
to call BSAFE Crypto-C funtions. The compilation went
on fine, no errors. But when I do a make test, it
failed on the BN_mod_m
I'm not sure what help this might be,
but I had similar results using the "gcc"
compiler on 32 bit hpux. I needed to
remove the compiler optimization flag
to get it to pass the bn test suite.
Al Borr
- Original Message -
From: Norman Nie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Se
I'm working with some data generated by a program that I have no control
over. I am trying to verify a pkcs7 signature generated by it. Could someone
take a look at the data I have and tell me what utilities I should use to
accomplish this? I've never had to deal with this type of data before. The
Hi!
I'm having an interesting problem porting some code from an NT box
to Solaris. I get the following error while trying to connect my client to
the server:
error:140770FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:unknown protocol
Func: SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO
lib: SSL routines
Reason: unknown
Sean Walker wrote:
>
> I'm working with some data generated by a program that I have no control
> over. I am trying to verify a pkcs7 signature generated by it. Could someone
> take a look at the data I have and tell me what utilities I should use to
> accomplish this? I've never had to deal with
Bodo Moeller wrote:
> Note that SSLv2_method will fail for some servers because they
> no longer support SSL 2.0 (and stopping to support it is a good
> thing because of its deficiencies). I suggest using
> SSLv23_method without SSL_OP_NO_TLSv1 in a first connection attempt;
> if this fails, try
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 09:22:24AM +0800, Michael Lee wrote:
> Bodo Moeller wrote:
>> Note that SSLv2_method will fail for some servers because they
>> no longer support SSL 2.0 (and stopping to support it is a good
>> thing because of its deficiencies). I suggest using
>> SSLv23_method without
Bodo Moeller wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 10:52:29AM +0800, Fung wrote:
>
>>> Have you tried using the SSLv23_method() instead of the SSLv3_method()?
>
>> But I know SSLv23_method has bugs at this version 0.9.5a.
>
> Can you elaborate?
I think what he meant is that in some cases SSLv23_metho
Hello,
On a server that I support there are three SSL certificate related files. One
of them I'm trying to understand the need for and how it relates to self
signed CA's that I generate for testing using Openssl.
The three files have explanations for them in the documentation as follows:
ca.pem
17 matches
Mail list logo