On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Juha Saarinen wrote:
>
> Yep, and ORBS' insistence on abusing non-relaying MTAs that have never been
> involved in spamming should be covered by that "zero tolerance" policy.
>
> -- Juha
>
Given that the ORBS folks block the MAPS/RSS mail servers it seems pretty
obvious,
%-> But, then again, after nearly 18 years of "Internet" connectivity and
%-> constant urging of our fellow employees who remember the "good
%-> old days", we
%-> are fairly close to what one might call "zero tolerance".
Yep, and ORBS' insistence on abusing non-relaying MTAs that have never been
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Juha Saarinen wrote:
> %-> affect us more than them. See - if they ISP the emails are originating
> %-> from is in say ORBS then all mail from that ISP will get bounced - hense
>
> Not ORBS, thanks. It has spite-listed most of my ISP's netblocks, which is
> not the way to
%-> There probably is a way - perhaps a direct tap into orbs - BUT
%-> that would
%-> affect us more than them. See - if they ISP the emails are originating
%-> from is in say ORBS then all mail from that ISP will get bounced - hense
Not ORBS, thanks. It has spite-listed most of my ISP's netbloc
IMHO this is quite relevant. If you don't want people to comment on the
spam then how about you show leadership here.
There probably is a way - perhaps a direct tap into orbs - BUT that would
affect us more than them. See - if they ISP the emails are originating
from is in say ORBS then all mai
Lee Melville wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here's my problem, the following code encrypts a file (i think it does
> anyhow), the test file that i use starts off as 22 bytes, the encrypted
> version is 24 ( i am not sure this is relevent). Anyhow the problem is when
> i come to decrypt the file using the o
Aram Khalili wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to include domain information into an X.509 cert Distinguished
> name. RFC2247 outlines Using Domains in LDAP/X.500 Distinguished Names.
> I've tried to include domainComponent, DC and dc in the configuration file
> under the [ req_distinguished_name
Hello,
If you are trying to encrypt a message using your program below and decrypt
it
using the OpenSSL command line tool, you will need to use the -nosalt option
since
you have NULLed the salt in:
EVP_BytesToKey(ciph,EVP_md5(),NULL,(unsigned
char*)passwd,strlen(passwd),1,(unsigned char *)key,(u
I will provide a broken example of the source to anyone who wants it. The
example
code has no real function it is just used to illustrate the problem. Contact
me at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--ian
> I have tried using static libraries and it works fine. But to distribute
> the utility with
> EXPORT func
"Dearnaley (EXT), Roger" wrote to openssl-users:
> Is there some way to block these jokers from the list?
Since it has nothing to do with OpenSSL, could you please not
discuss spam on this list? Pretty please, with sugar on top?
Thanks
-Lewis
10 matches
Mail list logo
