-Original Message-
From: R.Munden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 8:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Net::SSLeay install horks
This is what I'm getting from Net::SSLeay-1.05:
openssl-0.9.3a is installed
AIX 4.3 installed
RS/6000
This is what I'm getting from Net::SSLeay-1.05:
openssl-0.9.3a is installed
AIX 4.3 installed
RS/6000
Standard AIX C compiler
perl 5005_03 installed from IBM package (I didn't do it)
Any Ideas?
/tmp/Net_SSLeay.pm-1.05 ->make clean
rm -rf SSLeay.
> Did you unpack that in the same spot as an older version of OpenSSL?
> Did you run Configure?
No, and yes
sh config no-idea -fPIC
| Aaron Faby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
| Implementation Specialist, PowerSchool, Inc. |
| http://www.power
> "dohoff" == dohoff <- Doug Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes:
dohoff> I've run into a problem trying to compile openssl-0.9.6 on a Compaq
dohoff> Alpha running OSF1 v4.0. The compiler is DEC C V5.9-008 on Digital UNIX
dohoff> V4.0 (Rev. 1229). The ./config correctly identifies the os an
I've had success adding the following line somewhere before the offending
_asm block:
#define rdtsc __asm _emit 0x0F __asm _emit 0x31
Looking, back, however, this is probably a MS specific bandaid.
Cheers,
Mike Kurtinitis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Ales Pour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 06:37:49PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1. VerifyCallback cannot use X509_xxx functions. This is just taken from
> the apps source of the OpenSSL-0.9.5a distribution. How or why it is not
> working properly I cannot tell.
>
> static int VerifyCallback(int aniState,
>
Jim,
That message appears because of a bit of assembly in rand_win.c that uses an
opcode not supported by the inline assembler. Specifically the Pentium
opcode 'rdtsc' isn't recognized. Fortunately all you need to do is add the
following somewhere before the _asm {} block (in OpenSSL 0.9.6 it's a
I've run into a problem trying to compile openssl-0.9.6 on a Compaq Alpha
running OSF1 v4.0. The compiler is DEC C V5.9-008 on Digital UNIX V4.0 (Rev.
1229). The ./config correctly identifies the os and hardware arch but when I
do the make it blows out building SHA:
make[2]: Leaving directory `/u
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've created a CA cert/key for testing but I want to be able to test a longer
> cert chain. Does any one know what should be in the config file if I want to
> create a CA cert req which I would sign with the root CA cert. I have tried:
>
> basicConstraints=C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> Specifically, I create a new BIO_s_mem. Write to it with either BIO_puts or
> BIO_write. Then do a BIO_push(b64bio, mbio). Then BIO_read(b64bio, mybuf,
> len). It returns -1. When I ask if I should retry it says yes, but there is
> no output on the seco
Ricardo Stella wrote:
>
> So with the CA's server's private key and cert (converted in pem format)
> I would be able to use them as the CA for openssl, therefore issue certs
> based on this ?
>
> Thanks...
>
Yes that should be possible.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. http://www.drh-consul
Hello,
I'm trying to integrgate BIO_s_mem with BIO_base64. If I do a BIO_push(),
then write to the returned value, the data is base64 encoded ok and I can
retreive it using the ctrl supplied pointer. However, when I try the
reverse, (read, thereby invoking a decode) I get no output.
Specifically
Hi,
I've created a CA cert/key for testing but I want to be able to test a longer
cert chain. Does any one know what should be in the config file if I want to
create a CA cert req which I would sign with the root CA cert. I have tried:
basicConstraints=CA:TRUE
But in runtime verification it s
It has been quite a while since I've written my own server, but the
first thing I would do is add all ciphers to the server instead of
restricting the server to one cipher like you have. When you get a
connection, log the cipher that it connected with. Then you can limit it
to just that one cipher
Hi ,
I've already install openssl on linux with success and i'm trying to
install it on win95.
I've done each step according to the "install win32" file since i've to
setup and the config files and certificates manually. What does this
sentence mean ? On linux install you have to "certificate and
Hello,
I've encountered some problems using the OpenSSL toolkit. Unfortunately,
I cannot seem to find the right answers, and I'm hoping if there's anyone
out there able to help me.
Using OpenSSL-0.9.5a and compiling with both Borland C++ & Linux/G++ and
they share the same problems!
1. Verify
Sorry, got a crossed line there. (This stuff is completely making me go
bald. )
Grin,
Stephen.
- Original Message -
From: "Ales Pour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> No, :-)
> I meant - /G5 option isn't enough for VC5 to deal with Pentium
> instructions in inline assembler?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a RedHat Linux 6.2 with apache-1.3.12-2 and openssl-0.9.5-2
>
> I purchased a cryptographic key from Verisign for the site
> www.superobra.com.
>
> Configured httpd.conf.ssl and put the site at production.
> It works, transactions ar
Hi,
I have a RedHat Linux 6.2 with apache-1.3.12-2 and openssl-0.9.5-2
I purchased a cryptographic key from Verisign for the site
www.superobra.com.
Configured httpd.conf.ssl and put the site at production.
It works, transactions are made adequatedly most times, but
eventualy
Hello,
I'm a newbie in openssl... I try to create a simple ssl client using
jsse and a simple ssl server using Openssl (using example server
serv.cpp). To make the communication even simpler I use cipher suites
with no authentication (SSL_DH_anon_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA for jsse &
ADH-DES-CBC3-SHA
I changed the code as follows, sorry it is not in diff format. Essentially
remove the assembly language section and define and set tsc=0 which causes
the later code to use another random gen method.
static int have_perfc =1;
static int have_tsc = 0;//add line
#ifndef __GNUC__
/*
Steve wrote:
> The /G5 option does not exist for BC++ Ver3.0. I think it should be -5
> Stephen
No, :-)
I meant - /G5 option isn't enough for VC5 to deal with Pentium
instructions in inline assembler?
A.
__
OpenSSL Project
- Original Message -
From: "Ales Pour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hmmm... so /G5 option (ntdll.mak) isn't enough?
The /G5 option does not exist for BC++ Ver3.0. I think it should be -5
Stephen
__
OpenSSL Project
Steve wrote:
> The line in question is an assembly instruction: rdtsc, which is a Pentium
> (or beyond...) only instruction. You have to set your compiler options
> accordingly. Having said this, that command causes havoc with BC v3.0 IDE
Hmmm... so /G5 option (ntdll.mak) isn't enough?
Ales
---
The line in question is an assembly instruction: rdtsc, which is a Pentium
(or beyond...) only instruction. You have to set your compiler options
accordingly. Having said this, that command causes havoc with BC v3.0 IDE
(the command line compiler works OK with the appropriate flag) regardless of
If the read was successful you should get the number of bytes back. If the
result is <= 0 try calling SSL_get_error to see whether an error occured, or
the read operation simply blocked waiting for more data. If the later is the
case, do a select (or whatever) on the socket to monitor for the arri
I am using OpenSSL in non-blocking mode.
It appears that a read operation always returns a value of <= 0.
How can I determine the success of the read operation?
cc any replies to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Angelo
__
OpenSSL Project
Albino Rossi wrote:
> Hello,
> try to remove the line 580 from rand_win.c.
> Albino Rossi
Hi,
sure this helps :-)
So it's not a crucial piece of code?
Thanks!
Ales
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.op
Hello,
try to remove the line 580 from rand_win.c.
Albino Rossi
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Per conto di Ales Pour
> Inviato: martedì 17 ottobre 2000 15.45
> A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Oggetto: compiling 0.9.6 with VC5
>
>
>
> Hello,
> I'm try
Hi...
How can I use openssl to generate certificates to use
with IIS 4.0?
Thanks,
Luiz Carneiro
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support
Hello,
I'm trying to build DLLs with VC5. Here's what happened:
D:\Prac\_Misc\openssl-0.9.6>nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak
Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 1.62.7022
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1988-1997. All rights reserved.
Building OpenSSL
cl /Fotmp32dll\rand_win.obj -Ii
So with the CA's server's private key and cert (converted in pem format)
I would be able to use them as the CA for openssl, therefore issue certs
based on this ?
Thanks...
Dr S N Henson wrote:
>
> Ricardo Stella wrote:
> >
> > We were using Netscape Cert. Server 1.01. It was it's own root CA.
32 matches
Mail list logo