On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 21:45, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> When you are using s_client, you will most likely negotiate an EDH cipher
> that cannot be decrypted with ssldump. Use
> openssl -s_client -ciphers RC4-MD5 ...
> to generate "decryptable" sessions...
Ah - thank you - that makes total sense (and
> Browsers require that ssl certificates have the same name as the server
> from which they come.
That's an https protocol requirement, not a browser requirement (well, at
least not directly.)
> I believe this name of the certificate is the
> "common name" requested in the certificate set-up. Is
Hello:
Browsers require that ssl certificates have the same name as the server
from which they come. I believe this name of the certificate is the
"common name" requested in the certificate set-up. Is this correct? Is the
file name of the certificate irrelevant?
Thanks,
Ken
___
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003, Mike Acar wrote:
>
> I'll answer several messages at once in this mail.
>
> Nils Larsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Try:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > [dist_point]
> > dirName=dir_name
> >
> > [dir_name]
> > C=FI
> > O=SSH Communications Security Corp
> > CN=SS
Hi;I want to install fssl & it need to download & install openssl.I have 2 question & I want to help me?1.I read readme file for installation of fssl 2.1.0 & I read that fssl for c++ requires openssl 0.9.6c.could I download & use latest version of openssl?2.I read install.w32 file for installation
All,
I have the need to distinguish between a private key loaded
regularly with openssl and one that is loaded by an engine
(hw_pkcs11 trustway engine). It will always be an rsa key.
I looked a bit at the definition of rsa_st and found that there is
an engine pointer in there. Should this pointe
