Problem to install with openssl-0.9.7e

Hello, I have a problem to install this versiuon on my system. My system is a SUN with Solaris 9 GCC version 2.95.3 20010315 ./configure is ok make is ok but make install is no good: installing fips... making install in fips/sha1... sh: syntax error at line 2: `;' unexpected *** Error code 2 make:

Re: Problem to install with openssl-0.9.7e

Hmmm, what do line 1 and line 2 look like ? Anders On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Alain Chappuis wrote: > Hello, > I have a problem to install this versiuon on my system. > > My system is a SUN with Solaris 9 GCC version 2.95.3 20010315 > > ./configure is ok > make is ok > but make install is no good:

Re: Problem to install with openssl-0.9.7e

Anders Ringaby a écrit : Hmmm, what do line 1 and line 2 look like ? I dont know! I'm not familiar with this script, here is my demand of help!... On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Alain Chappuis wrote: Hello, I have a problem to install this versiuon on my system. My system is a SUN with Solaris 9 GCC versio

key format

Hello, I'm trying to create a little program that can load certificates and keys in a database with openssl api. But I'm not clear with keys files format. Correct me if I'm wrong : - PKCS#8 format is an encrypted format that contains private and public key. - PKCS#1 is a format for RSA key

Re: key format

On Fri, Feb 11, 2005, Janin-Magnificat Thomas wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to create a little program that can load certificates and keys > in a database with openssl api. But I'm not clear with keys files format. > Correct me if I'm wrong : > > - PKCS#8 format is an encrypted format that co

Re: Problem with signing methods

Sorry, I had not noticed that my mail client send mail in HTML. Thanks for your help. Dr. Stephen Henson escribió (Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:59:01 +0100): > On Thu, Feb 10, 2005, Santiago Zapata Hernandez wrote: > > >> Hi everybody. I need to sign some data, but I'm obtaining >> differen

RE: key format

Thanks for your answer, Can SLLeavy format be encoded in DER and PEM form ? -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Dr. Stephen Henson Envoyé : vendredi 11 février 2005 14:44 À : openssl-users@openssl.org Objet : Re: key format On Fri, Feb 11, 200

Re: Problem to install with openssl-0.9.7e

> > Hmmm, what do line 1 and line 2 look like ? > > I dont know! I'm not familiar with this script, > here is my demand of help!... Try looking at the "install" entry in the makefile ( Makefile ), and follow the code from there. > > On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Alain Chappuis wrote: > > > > > >>He

Re: Problem to install with openssl-0.9.7e

Anders Ringaby a écrit : Hmmm, what do line 1 and line 2 look like ? I dont know! I'm not familiar with this script, here is my demand of help!... Try looking at the "install" entry in the makefile ( Makefile ), and follow the code from there. I think is tHere is: install: all install_docs instal

Re: key format

On Fri, Feb 11, 2005, Janin-Magnificat Thomas wrote: > Thanks for your answer, > > Can SLLeavy format be encoded in DER and PEM form ? > Yes. The only difference between unencrypted PEM and DER is that unencrypted PEM is the DER form base64 encoded with start and end lines. Steve. -- Dr Stephe

BIO failure with fd's

Here is my code snippet:      int fd;    BIO *bio;    fd = open(file, "r" );    bio = BIO_new(BIO_s_fd() );    BIO_set_fd(bio,fd,  BIO_NOCLOSE);      X509 *x=null;    x= PEM_read_bio_X509(data, NULL,ctx->default_password_callback, ctx->default_password_callback_userdata);     PEM_read_bio_X