Hi,
After spend two days looking for a way to resolve my problem, I decided
to try this list.
I'm trying to use PEM funcions (like PEM_write_RSAPublicKey(out, rsa))
and I'm getting runtime error in my Borland C++ Builder, version 5, under
Windows plataform.
I've
Is ECC only used where public key crytography would be used? As a
replacement for DH, for example? Or can it be used where symmetric
cryptography would be used?
Also, are there any IP issues related to using it? I thought I read
that many aspects of ECC has been patented by various people and
c
Hi,
> My suggestion is to double check DNS resolving system.
> Such long delays when connecting may be caused be
> problems with reverse DNS.
> On Linux you may check this with:
>
> $ dig some.domain.name
> $ dig -x some.ip.number
>
> If (for examle) sendmail checks some fields in certificate
>
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 11:13:45AM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
This applies to encrypting email content (S/MIME, PGP, ...), but not to
use of TLS, which leaves the delivered email in the clear.
According to the sendmail docs:
"privacy/confidentiality: the tran
Hello,
> Thanks for the info Marek, much appreciated. I used the above info
> and it worked for reducing the key strength, but it didn't solve the delays
> in sending email. Still good to know though since it's one less thing to
> consider. Must be something else that's causing the long delays. Eve
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 11:13:45AM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
> >This applies to encrypting email content (S/MIME, PGP, ...), but not to
> >use of TLS, which leaves the delivered email in the clear.
>
> According to the sendmail docs:
> "privacy/confidentiality: the transmission of an e-mail be
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:17:13AM -0700, Bear Giles wrote:
(Aside: why would an organization insist on internal cleartext? One big
cause is sexual and racial harassment complaints. Settlements routinely
require the organization to monitor all email for offensive c
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:17:13AM -0700, Bear Giles wrote:
> (Aside: why would an organization insist on internal cleartext? One big
> cause is sexual and racial harassment complaints. Settlements routinely
> require the organization to monitor all email for offensive content.)
This applies to
Marek Marcola wrote:
Hello,
Hi, this might sound like an odd question, but I'm trying to figure
out if there's a way to "use" openssl without actually encrypting
anything.
Of course, SSL/TLS consists of three purposes:
- peer authentication (where, for example, RSA is used)
- data en
You don't stand to gain much by not encrypting and only authenticating.
Encryption and authentication are very different things. They're related
since encryption without authentication leaves you open to
man-in-the-middle attacks, but there are plenty of situations where you
just need auth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Clem Taylor schrieb:
> Hi,
Hello Clem,
> Firefox seems to accept the subjectAltName extension, but I'm having
> troubles getting firefox to trust the additional level of certificate
> hierarchy.
[...]
> Root CA cert (self signed) [added to trust stor
11 matches
Mail list logo
