Hi,
I am new to openssl. I want to know what's a difference between
standard/message-digest/cipher commands. What purpose and when & where
it is used.
Please suggest any url to learn about commands and when ,where & how it
is used.
Thanks,
Senthilkumar.
__
Michal Trojnara wrote:
> On Sunday 10 December 2006 00:42, Ben Sandee wrote:
>> On 12/9/06, Michal Trojnara wrote:
>> > The library is OpenSSL 0.9.8d configured with:
>> > ./Configure threads shared zlib debug-linux-elf
>> >
>> > Can you help me find a solution or a better workaround?
>>
>> Did you
Hello,
> Aren't these statements mutually exclusive? How can the dynamic locks be
> "needed" and "not used" at the same time? Do I have to support them or
> not? I'm confused...
No. Dynamic callbacks are used by some ENGINE modules (NCipher for
example).
Best regards,
--
Marek Marcola <[EMAIL
Hi Guys,
I've one query regarding SSL_write call provided by OpenSSL library. The
SSL_write could return with READ_ERROR or WRITE_ERROR with partial writing
of data. While re-attempting to send the data once again SSL_Write expects
the same arguments as that of the previous one. If I give a dif
Hello,
> The output on the s_client side is as follows;
>
>
> SSL3 alert write:fatal:handshake failure
> 6389:error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version
> number:s3_pkt.c:288:
This means that client don't want to support received from
server SSL version.
> I am using the -ssl3 fla
Hello openssl users.
I was ordered to create a public/private key using one of the following
ciphersuite:
i. CIPHERSUITE SSL_3DES_SHA
ii. CIPHERSUITE SSL_DES_SHA
iii.CIPHERSUITE SSL_RC4_SHA
iv. CIPHERSUITE SSL_RC4_MD5
Can you tell me how to create each one? Which is more sec
Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Aren't these statements mutually exclusive? How can the dynamic locks be
> > "needed" and "not used" at the same time? Do I have to support them or
> > not? I'm confused...
> No. Dynamic callbacks are used by some ENGINE modules (NCipher for
> example
Olivier Mascia wrote:
Are there searchable archives of this mailing-list?
I'd like to look them up before posting questions.
See http://www.openssl.org/support/ at the bottom.
Ciao,
Richard
--
Dr. Richard W. Könning
Fujitsu Siemens Computers GmbH
Hello,
>
>I've one query regarding SSL_write call provided by OpenSSL
> library. The SSL_write could return with READ_ERROR or WRITE_ERROR
> with partial writing of data. While re-attempting to send the data
> once again SSL_Write expects the same arguments as that of the
> previous one. If I
Hi List,
How do I set ISO10126 padding for AES/3-DES encryption.
I found that it is possible to enable/disable padding by using
EVP_CIPHER_CTX_set_padding().
But I need to change the default padding of openssl (rather than
enabling or disabling).
My code uses typical block cipher encryption ap
On 12/11/06, Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It almost seems like the server is accepted SSL3 msgs, but sending out
> another protocol type. Any suggestions?
If you using Linux, can you send ssldump or wireshark dump
of this session.
Here is an ssldump of s_client connecting to my s
Michal Trojnara wrote:
Dear OpenSSL users,
When performing stress-testing of stunnel with session cache
disabled I receive core dumps on concurrent SSL_connect() calls.
Here is an example stack backtrace:
#0 0xa7e60d41 in BN_ucmp (a=0x80a28fc, b=0x80a1f08) at bn_lib.c:662
662 bn_c
On 12/11/06, chris busbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/11/06, Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It almost seems like the server is accepted SSL3 msgs, but sending out
> > another protocol type. Any suggestions?
> If you using Linux, can you send ssldump or wireshark dump
> of this
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 10:48:34AM -0600, chris busbey wrote:
> On 12/11/06, Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> It almost seems like the server is accepted SSL3 msgs, but sending out
> >> another protocol type. Any suggestions?
> >If you using Linux, can you send ssldump or wireshark d
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 11:01:22AM -0600, chris busbey wrote:
> On 12/11/06, chris busbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 12/11/06, Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > It almost seems like the server is accepted SSL3 msgs, but sending out
> >> > another protocol type. Any suggestions
Marek Marcola wrote:
I've one query regarding SSL_write call provided by OpenSSL
library. The SSL_write could return with READ_ERROR or WRITE_ERROR
with partial writing of data. While re-attempting to send the data
once again SSL_Write expects the same arguments as that of the
previous one. If
> Another trial forcing tls1 on both sides of the connection did not
> result in the above "Length Mismatch" error. Here is the output of
> that trial's ssl dump. Any thoughts?
>
> New TCP connection #67: localhost.localdomain(42489) <->
> localhost.localdomain(5758)
> 67 1 0.0032 (0.0032) C>S
Hello,
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 10:48:34AM -0600, chris busbey wrote:
>
> > On 12/11/06, Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> It almost seems like the server is accepted SSL3 msgs, but sending out
> > >> another protocol type. Any suggestions?
> > >If you using Linux, can you send ssl
Hello,
Can you send ssldump with -aAdN options ?
Best regards,
--
Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-
On 12/11/06, Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you send ssldump with -aAdN options ?
Certainly. (Certificate details have been obfuscated)
New TCP connection #8: localhost.localdomain(48429) <->
localhost.localdomain(5758)
8 1 0.0028 (0.0028) C>S SSLv2 compatible client hello
Ver
Hello,
> On 12/11/06, Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can you send ssldump with -aAdN options ?
>
> Certainly. (Certificate details have been obfuscated)
>
> New TCP connection #8: localhost.localdomain(48429) <->
> localhost.localdomain(5758)
> 8 1 0.0028 (0.0028) C>S SSLv2 compat
On 12/11/06, Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This TLS1 looks good, but sorry I've forget xX options,
so output from "ssldump -aAdNxX" should give more information
(SSL packet dump) with ending error.
Hrm... ssldump fails during the handshake with a 'Length Mismatch"
error with the xX
On Monday 11 December 2006 18:03, Nils Larsch wrote:
> does it help is you build openssl without BN_DEBUG ? When BN_DEBUG
> is defined bn_check_top() is a macro that should check if the BIGNUM::top
> value is correclty set (note: this isn't really a solution as
> bn_check_top() (without BN_DEBUG_RA
Hello,
> Hrm... ssldump fails during the handshake with a 'Length Mismatch"
> error with the xX options. Here is the output;
>
> New TCP connection #5: localhost.localdomain(53503) <->
> localhost.localdomain(5758)
> 5 1 0.0024 (0.0024) C>S SSLv2 compatible client hello
> Version 3.1
> ciph
24 matches
Mail list logo