Re: Vista 64 bit

2008-01-01 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Thomas J. Hruska wrote: If you absolutely have to have a 64-bit build (i.e. 32-bit doesn't work), wait a few weeks. I'm planning on purchasing and installing Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2008 out of my own pocket (since almost no one donates). One of

Re[2]: Vista 64 bit

2008-01-01 Thread Gunivortus Goos
Hello Thomas, If you absolutely have to have a 64-bit build (i.e. 32-bit doesn't work), wait a few weeks. I'm planning on purchasing and installing Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2008 out of my own pocket (since almost no one donates). One of the first things I plan on doing is

Re: Vista 64 bit

2008-01-01 Thread Thomas J. Hruska
G.W. Haywood wrote: Hi there, On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Thomas J. Hruska wrote: If you absolutely have to have a 64-bit build (i.e. 32-bit doesn't work), wait a few weeks. I'm planning on purchasing and installing Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2008 out of my own pocket (since almost no one

Re: Vista 64 bit

2008-01-01 Thread Thomas J. Hruska
Gunivortus Goos wrote: Hello Thomas, After downloading I ran the install and ready it was. However, being a MS Windows user, I usually don't read all textfiles, supposing it works too without that. ;-) It should. Just installing it should cause any software that depends on it to function

Re: Vista 64 bit

2008-01-01 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Thomas J. Hruska wrote: I'm holding back from a 64-bit build of the Win32(?) OpenSSL installer for another couple weeks because I need to purchase Visual Studio Professional 2008 (i.e. I can't use VC++ Express) for various reasons and my development computer gets unhappy when I install new

Re: Vista 64 bit

2008-01-01 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Thomas J. Hruska wrote: I know about the 90 day trial. The VS 2008 install is going to hose my existing dev. environment. So, I'd rather just hose it once (install the full thing) than hose it twice (install the trial and then install the full thing). I have VS.2003, VS.2005, and VS.2008 all

Re: Vista 64 bit

2008-01-01 Thread Thomas J. Hruska
Jeffrey Altman wrote: Thomas J. Hruska wrote: I'm holding back from a 64-bit build of the Win32(?) OpenSSL installer for another couple weeks because I need to purchase Visual Studio Professional 2008 (i.e. I can't use VC++ Express) for various reasons and my development computer gets unhappy

Please Remove [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-01-01 Thread Tom
Too many emails for me. Please take me off _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of KOLLURU SURESH Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2007 6:08 AM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Hi Please remove from the mailing list K. Suresh K.

RE: Re[2]: Vista 64 bit

2008-01-01 Thread David Schwartz
??? I'm sorry, I never did any programming, never any compiling, I'm just an enduser, using payware, shareware and freeware programs, that are already prepared for use. ;-) Then why are you downloading OpenSSL? It's a library, a toolkit. It has no enduser application. If you are installing

Please Remove [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-01-01 Thread karthik kumar
Remove

Re: [!! SPAM] RE: Re[2]: Vista 64 bit

2008-01-01 Thread Gunivortus Goos
Hello David, Then why are you downloading OpenSSL? It's a library, a toolkit. It has no enduser application. Are you really sure? I subscribed, while at the openssl.org site for this list the description was given: openssl-users open anybody Application Development, OpenSSL Usage,

Re[2]: Vista 64 bit

2008-01-01 Thread Gunivortus Goos
Hello Thomas, Hmm...interesting. Can't do the popup thing for various reasons but I'll see if I can think up something. Grin maybe placing the donation suggestion above the download links on your site. As I found your site at Google, I scrolled down until I found the downloadlink,