missing symbols when building openssl1.0.0g as static library..

2012-02-28 Thread JonathonS
Hi all, I am building openssl as a static library, and when I link to it, I am getting a bunch of missing symbols that *should* be defined by openssl. Here is the command I used to build openssl: ./Configure --prefix=/home/user/openssl_release --openssldir=/home/user/openssl_release no-asm

Re: missing symbols when building openssl1.0.0g as static library..

2012-02-28 Thread Michael S. Zick
On Tue February 28 2012, JonathonS wrote: Hi all, I am building openssl as a static library, and when I link to it, I am getting a bunch of missing symbols that *should* be defined by openssl. Here is the command I used to build openssl: ./Configure --prefix=/home/user/openssl_release

RE: missing symbols when building openssl1.0.0g as static library..

2012-02-28 Thread Jeremy Farrell
From: JonathonS [mailto:thejunk...@gmail.com] I am building openssl as a static library, and when I link to it, I am getting a bunch of missing symbols that *should* be defined by openssl. Here is the command I used to build openssl: ./Configure --prefix=/home/user/openssl_release

Re: missing symbols when building openssl1.0.0g as static library..

2012-02-28 Thread Wim Lewis
On 28 Feb 2012, at 9:57 AM, JonathonS wrote: Here is the command I used to build openssl: ./Configure --prefix=/home/user/openssl_release --openssldir=/home/user/openssl_release no-asm threads zlib shared linux-x86_64 After the binaries have been built, it produces libcrypto.a and

1.0.1 Beta3 SHLIB_MINOR value is 0.0 - is it on purpose?

2012-02-28 Thread dave.mclellan
I'm noticing the version number of the SSL and crypto libraries are showing 1.0.0, but I expected 1.0.1. I can see the statement SHLIB_MINOR in the Makefile that sets it, and it seems on purpose, but I want to make sure. Snippet from Makefile at the top level, beginning at line 7, through

Re: missing symbols when building openssl1.0.0g as static library..

2012-02-28 Thread JonathonS
Thanks guys for all your help. I am using 64-bit linux Centos. The binaries were built with GCC 4.4.4. I am not currently linking against libcurl. I am just linking against my own project. I am pretty sure the cause of the problem is that the symbols are not defined in the binaries produced.

RE: missing symbols when building openssl1.0.0g as static library..

2012-02-28 Thread Jeremy Farrell
From: JonathonS [mailto:thejunk...@gmail.com] Thanks guys for all your help. I am using 64-bit linux Centos. The binaries were built with GCC 4.4.4. I am not currently linking against libcurl. I am just linking against my own project. I am pretty sure the cause of the problem is

OpenSSL Security Update for Windows Server 2008 R2 x 64 Edition (KB2585542)

2012-02-28 Thread Michael D
Security Update for Windows Server 2008 R2 x 64 Edition (KB2585542) http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?displaylang=enid=28629  Does anybody have any experience with this security patch? It seems to affect older versions of openssl (0.9.7 or so)... does anybody have experience

Re: missing symbols when building openssl1.0.0g as static library..

2012-02-28 Thread JonathonS
Thanks guys. Sorry for the confusion. I thought U meant undefined and T meant it *belongs* in the text section, NOT that it actually *exists* in the text section :) Here is my linker command. g++ -g -o unit_tests unit_tests.o -L/home/user/build/openssl/debug/lib -lcrypto -lssl

Re: missing symbols when building openssl1.0.0g as static library..

2012-02-28 Thread Wim Lewis
On 28 Feb 2012, at 5:15 PM, JonathonS wrote: Thanks guys. Sorry for the confusion. I thought U meant undefined and T meant it *belongs* in the text section, NOT that it actually *exists* in the text section :) Here is my linker command. g++ -g -o unit_tests unit_tests.o

Final release of Openssl-1.0.1 and FIPS-2.0

2012-02-28 Thread Alex Chen
When can we expect the final release of OpenSSL 1.0.1? Does FIPS 2.0 only work with OpenSSL 1.0.1 but not 1.0.0? There is a document, http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cmvp/documents/140-1/140InProcess.pdf, of pending FIPS certificate and OpenSSL object module is there. Is that for FIPS 2.0? When

Re: missing symbols when building openssl1.0.0g as static library..

2012-02-28 Thread JonathonS
Thanks :) That was the problem! Very interesting. I didn't think order mattered :) I reordered it and it worked. J On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Wim Lewis w...@omnigroup.com wrote: On 28 Feb 2012, at 5:15 PM, JonathonS wrote: Thanks guys. Sorry for the confusion.  I thought U meant