-Original Message-
From: Scott Lamb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The spammer who zapped the mod_ssl list (see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modsslr=1b=200403w=2) has now
moved onto this list (see content-free mail apparently from rse...)
Can someone with admin powers block these
-Original Message-
From: Ben Laurie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I disagree.
I've lost the thread... You want to limit posting to subscribers only or
you don't?
BTW, the mod_ssl list has been swamped by some spammer. Would this list
be immune to these posts (the spammer is craftily
Plain text please...
Obvious error? It's not a tar file. It's a gzipped tar file. The
simplest way to unpack is to:
gzip -dc openssl-0.9.7c.tar.gz | tar xvf -
Alternatively;
gunzip openssl-0.9.7c.tar.gz
tar xvf openssl-0.9.7c.tar
Rgds,
Owen Boyle
Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this
-Original Message-
From: John S. Wolter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am wondering if there is a document that describes where
the files of
OpenSSL should normally be placed?
Look in the INSTALL file. The default location for Unix is
/usr/local/openssl, but you can put it anywhere
Plain text please...
You are not getting these emails through the list. What has happened is
that your email address has been harvested by spammer-robot which has
simply gone through the archives of the list (you have posted to this
list - e.g.
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Wataru Nakagawa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Donnerstag, 20. Marz 2003 08:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Apache down under WindowNT
How do you do.
Since I am a Japanese, I am not so good at English.
Please allow, even if there is
-Original Message-
From: Manoj Kithany [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Now I have installed SSL Certificates on my Servers and
wondering how to configure Apache for SSL?
Should I install mod_ssl or Apache-SSL? Are both these same ?
which one is recommended?
Both methods achieve the same
-Original Message-
From: Charles B Cranston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2003 21:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Signing certificates on Windows
Franck Martin wrote:
You can't use virtual hosts on apache with https.
Each host must have its own IP address,
-Original Message-
From: Leonardo Lagos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Freitag, 3. Januar 2003 16:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: how to generate PRNG in Solaris 8 ?
Hi People,
After downloading openssl and openssh from sunfreeware.com,
for my sparc/8, I'm
geeting the error PRNG
-Original Message-
From: Ana Belen Porto Pazos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Try to add in the $PATH enviroment variable the location of
gcc to be used instead of cc.
Ditto. The native Sun compiler (/usr/ucb/cc) will not work with openssl.
You need gcc.
This message is for the named
Always compile the latest version (0.9.6g) - it has bug and security
fixes. Each version is an improvement on the previous one, it is not
that certain versions are designed for certain platforms. Follow the
installation instructions and use the gcc compiler if possible...
-Original
Recomendations Solaris 8
thats what I have done, but what version og GCC is recommended.
-Original Message-
From: Boyle Owen [mailto:Owen.Boyle;swx.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 2:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Compiler Recomendations Solaris 8
You might like to download
gcc 2.95 package from sun freeware. I am trying to
compile
openssl-9.6g it is failing. Could some one recomend a compiler version /
package to compile openssl-9.6g
-Original Message-
From: Boyle Owen [mailto:Owen.Boyle;swx.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 4:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
My only advice would be to use gcc. I can confirm that gcc 3.2 will
compile openssl on Solaris 8 with no problem. Alternatively, if you
don't mind an out-of-the-box openssl, get the package from
www.sunfreeware.com.
-Original Message-
From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mittwoch,
I wouldn't hold out much hope... Openssl expects a recent gcc-like
compiler and libraries. I am not suprised it won't compile on an old
compiler.
However, I am puzzled by your request. If this is a public server you
are running a tremendous risk with such an old version of Solaris - you
should
First off, you might be better posting this on the apache list
(http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html) since I think this primarily a server issue
(or maybe mod_ssl) - not really openSSL...
Having said that, I can perhaps offer some hints as to what's going on:
- 400 is a Bad Request... this
Good question... I'm not an expert on the cryptography aspect but I think what happens
is that your encryption becomes predictable - that is, the same input plaintext,
encrypted twice, produces the same encrypted data. This leaves you open to a frequency
analysis attack. This is not the case
Hi,
After upgrading to openSSL-0.9.6g and reinstalling openssh_3.4p1, I can't get ssh or
sshd to work. As soon as I try to start the sshd daemon or an ssh session, I
immediately get the command line error PRNG is not seeded.
Previously, with openssl-0.9.6f and openssh_3.4p1, all was working
From: Lutz Jaenicke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
After upgrading to openSSL-0.9.6g and reinstalling
openssh_3.4p1, I can't get ssh or sshd to work. As soon as I
try to start the sshd daemon or an ssh session, I immediately
get the command line error PRNG is not seeded.
I doubt that your
From: Boyle Owen
After upgrading to openSSL-0.9.6g and reinstalling
openssh_3.4p1, I can't get ssh or sshd to work. As soon as I
try to start the sshd daemon or an ssh session, I immediately
get the command line error PRNG is not seeded.
Thanks Lutz, for helping out - your tips really got
20 matches
Mail list logo
