RE: Failing to build OpenSSL 1.0.0f on obsolete Debian box (i386, kernel 2.0.36)

2012-01-19 Thread Brooke, Simon
. wrote: On 1/18/2012 9:57 AM, Brooke, Simon wrote: Sadly, removing -fomit-frame-pointer does not work. Isn't that the default behavior for -O3? On GCC - yes. OP is using the ancestor of what is now known as GCC. The answer was in another person's post - his binutils is too old to recognize

Failing to build OpenSSL 1.0.0f on obsolete Debian box (i386, kernel 2.0.36)

2012-01-18 Thread Brooke, Simon
Hi We have a box running Debian 2.1 still in production, and for complicated reasons we can't replace it immediately. I'm trying to compile OpenSSH for it, and to do that I need to compile OpenSSL. The issue I'm seeing is very similar to that reported by Alain Guibert here:

RE: Failing to build OpenSSL 1.0.0f on obsolete Debian box (i386, kernel 2.0.36)

2012-01-18 Thread Brooke, Simon
, kernel 2.0.36) On 1/18/2012 12:00 PM, Brooke, Simon wrote: Hi We have a box running Debian 2.1 still in production, and for complicated reasons we can't replace it immediately. I'm trying to compile OpenSSH for it, and to do that I need to compile OpenSSL. The issue I'm seeing is very

RE: Failing to build OpenSSL 1.0.0f on obsolete Debian box (i386, kernel 2.0.36)

2012-01-18 Thread Brooke, Simon
Subject: Re: Failing to build OpenSSL 1.0.0f on obsolete Debian box (i386, kernel 2.0.36) On Wed January 18 2012, Jakob Bohm wrote: On 1/18/2012 1:54 PM, Michael S. Zick wrote: On Wed January 18 2012, Jakob Bohm wrote: On 1/18/2012 12:00 PM, Brooke, Simon wrote: Hi We have a box