t you've advised people that they really don't need to
be concerned with whether or not they're violating some other company's
patent rights. Your demeanor suggests that you don't take such things
seriously (c.f. your exhoration to me to "lighten up")
e local Circle K (or stealing intellectual property in the
form of a software patent, if you want my opinion), regardless of whatever
rational argument you want to put behind it.
Maybe it's *you* who should stop talking.
Regards,
Dave Neuer
THESE VIEWS DEFINITELY DON'T REFLEC
Aaron D. Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Dave Neuer wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Aaron D. Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: Stunnel Maillist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL P
loyees. None of this
>is stuff that I make any money off of directly- ie. I'm not trying to
>sell anything with SSL or RSA in it
If this is the case (ie, it's not part of a product or service you sell),
why not just use RSARef? You can't get it from
u can modify it to fix bugs or
add features. But you can't do any of these things in the US if you see one
penny from these activities in any way, shape, or form and haven't paid RSA
somewhere in the tens of thousands of dollars.
Dave Neuer
-Original Message-
From: Michael J. Ma
LWP currently doesn't have a protocol handler for HTTPS, only HTTP. You'd
have to roll your own, though there may be a Perl interface for OpenSSL to
make it easier.
Dave Neuer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMA
mod_ssl requires at least one small tweak to run on Linux + Glibc2.1 (I and
others I know of ran into one particular one -- ndbm.h has moved --, but I'd
not be surprised if there are more).
Dave Neuer
-Original Message-
From: Massimiliano Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAI
When a patent expires, it ceases to be enforceable, period.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, April 29, 1999 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: RSA licensing for OpenSSL usage?
>>> This may or may not mean that you can u
on this list as at least half of the answers they
get will either be incomplete, wrong or more questions.
I welcome any comments, corrections, clarifications, and suggestions.
Dave Neuer
Software Engineer
Futuristics Labs, Inc.
_
-Original Message-
From: Leland V. Lammert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, April 28, 1999 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: While there is a discussion on RSA
>At 10:24 AM 4/28/99 -0400, Dave
E from
RSADSI, or buy a commercial Apache+SSL (from C2Net, Covalent, or Red Hat).
Dave Neuer
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED
se then their
patches which provided the interface to the ssl module wouldn't apply
correctly). Of course, Stronghold (at the time that I used it) came with a
$1000 price tag, as opposed to RHSWS's $100 price. With
The patents for the RSA algorithms expire in September of 2000.
Dave Neuer
-Original Message-
From: Ross Foard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, April 27, 1999 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: RSA licensing for OpenSSL usage?
>Does anyone
e to the conclusion
>that I had when I started. RSAref was never intended for commercial use,
>strictly academic. So, due to the fact that I am 1300 miles and a firewall
>away from my development machine, does openSSL support DH and/or DSA?
>
>Thank
s, DON'T SEE ANY REVENUE, and have express written
permission from RSADSI for any changes that you make to the API.
*I'm not a lawyer*, but it seems like everything you describe is permissible
under the license, provided you document all of your changes, provide the
source and all of
That's correct; however, if you already had an RSAref distribution, the
license states that your license is perpetual. Additionally, the license
for the 2.0 distribution of RSAref appears to allow redistribution of RSAref
(called "the Program" in the license agreement), provided that 1) you
provi
/~schlafly/ -- Schafly's site w/ lots of legal filings,
etc.
http://www.rsa.com/rsalabs/faq/html/6-3-2.html -- RSA's patent claims on DSA
Dave Neuer
-Original Message-
From: Ricardo Stella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, April 12,
discreet crypto lib
lying around on their system that they could try to put to arbitrary uses.
I feel I must repeat, "I AM NOT A LAWYER." However, I'd suggest anyone
adhering to the idea that licensing a particular RSA implementation gives
them any rights to the algorithm itsel
18 matches
Mail list logo
