On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 07:40:44PM -0400, Matthew L Daniel wrote:
> If this needs to go to the dev list, let me know.
>
> I am experiencing a SIGSEGV in BN_BLINDING_free because mt_blinding
> appears to be 0x11 instead of a pointer to some memory.
We had an identical issue reported here:
https:/
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 09:48:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have tried upgrading the version of openssl 0.9.6 on a RedHat 7.1 machine
> to 0.9.6b using the RedHat openssl.spec file and it broke several
> applications, including openssh. This is why I've been saying in the case of
> RedH
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 11:12:38AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >You could do this yourself without too much trouble. You'd just have to
> >comment out the %{SOURCE1} line in openssl.spec, and adjust
> >the ./config
> >line appropriately, and learn how to rebuild a source RPM :)
> >
> >joe
>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 10:55:44AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have Red Hat Linux 7.0 with openssl-0.9.5a-14 as a part of it. Now I want to
> compile and install KDE 2.2 what requires openssl-0.9.6. Is it possible to use
> both versions of openssl and it should be configured? I don't wan
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:40:32PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Sirs,
>
> I'm running RedHat 7.1 with kernel 2.4.3-12 on my Intel P3 866 system.
> Recently, I just removed the openssl package that came with RedHat 7.1
> and I installed the source package from the openssl website. After
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 01:44:57AM +0800, Lim Kwang Eng wrote:
> Anyone knows how to install Redhat 7.2 RPM version of openssl over the
> Redhat 7.1 RPM version openssl?
You need to get the openssl096 compatibility package;
ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/redhat/7.2/en/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/openssl096-0.9
Hi, I've written up a page which hopefully answers these questions:
http://www.manyfish.co.uk/openssl.html
Let me know if anything is not clear. As John said, the RPM you need is
from Raw Hide, so none of this stuff is supported or recommended by Red
Hat. On your own head be it...
Regards,
joe
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 10:06:41AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 22 Apr 2002 22:38:47 -0700,
>Aleksey Sanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> aleksey> IMHO it's bad idea to use gcc 3.0 on Solaris now. I had very
> aleksey> bad expirience with it
Hiya, I've been looking at renegotiations in mod_ssl - can anyone
confirm whether the following statement is true:
- it is only safe to call SSL_renegotiate and SSL_do_handshake to
instigate an SSL renegotiation if you know that the peer is in a state
where it must not be sending any data.
This s
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:51:02PM +0100, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009, Mourad Cherfaoui (mcherfao) wrote:
> > I am not sure I understand why the client is broken? Did you mean that the
> > sign bit can be omitted if the client sends the entire chain of certificates
> > (except
10 matches
Mail list logo
