> I'm not sure I like this, because you have no strong assurance that
> you've successfully eliminated RSA everywhere, and it also means that
> programs that use OpenSSL can only be certified RSA-clean with runtime
> testing.
>
> I agree that #iffing the entire source file is the way to go, thou
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>
> > Frank O'Dwyer wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is it still possible to build OpenSSL without RSA support? The configure
> > > script doesn't mention -DNO_RSA as an option, and when I went ahead and
> > > specified it anyway, the build was broken in a number of places
> Frank O'Dwyer wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is it still possible to build OpenSSL without RSA support? The configure
> > script doesn't mention -DNO_RSA as an option, and when I went ahead and
> > specified it anyway, the build was broken in a number of places. Are
> > there any other flags I nee
Frank O'Dwyer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is it still possible to build OpenSSL without RSA support? The configure
> script doesn't mention -DNO_RSA as an option, and when I went ahead and
> specified it anyway, the build was broken in a number of places. Are
> there any other flags I need to add?
>
It
Hi,
Is it still possible to build OpenSSL without RSA support? The configure
script doesn't mention -DNO_RSA as an option, and when I went ahead and
specified it anyway, the build was broken in a number of places. Are
there any other flags I need to add?
Cheers,
Frank O'Dwyer.
__
