On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Juha Saarinen wrote:
>
> Yep, and ORBS' insistence on abusing non-relaying MTAs that have never been
> involved in spamming should be covered by that "zero tolerance" policy.
>
> -- Juha
>
Given that the ORBS folks block the MAPS/RSS mail servers it seems pretty
obvious,
%-> But, then again, after nearly 18 years of "Internet" connectivity and
%-> constant urging of our fellow employees who remember the "good
%-> old days", we
%-> are fairly close to what one might call "zero tolerance".
Yep, and ORBS' insistence on abusing non-relaying MTAs that have never been
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Juha Saarinen wrote:
> %-> affect us more than them. See - if they ISP the emails are originating
> %-> from is in say ORBS then all mail from that ISP will get bounced - hense
>
> Not ORBS, thanks. It has spite-listed most of my ISP's netblocks, which is
> not the way to
%-> There probably is a way - perhaps a direct tap into orbs - BUT
%-> that would
%-> affect us more than them. See - if they ISP the emails are originating
%-> from is in say ORBS then all mail from that ISP will get bounced - hense
Not ORBS, thanks. It has spite-listed most of my ISP's netbloc
IMHO this is quite relevant. If you don't want people to comment on the
spam then how about you show leadership here.
There probably is a way - perhaps a direct tap into orbs - BUT that would
affect us more than them. See - if they ISP the emails are originating
from is in say ORBS then all mai
