Re: BN functions and Solaris 7 'bc' disagree

2000-04-29 Thread Bodo Moeller
Ted Powell <@tgivan.com>: > When I ran openssl-0.9.5a's "make test", the tmp.bntest file that was > written contained (out of 1800+ tests) seven expressions which Solaris 7's > 'bc' evaluated to give non-zero results. [...] > When I feed the problematic tmp.bntest to GNU bc (version 1.05a, on Red

Re: BN functions and Solaris 7 'bc' disagree

2000-04-29 Thread Michal Trojnara
Odpowiedz automatyczna: Do 5 maja przebywam na zasluzonym urlopie. W pilnych sprawach prosze o kontakt z Kamilem Kilinskim. Z powazaniem, Michal Trojnara >>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 04/29/00 19:36 >>> Ted Powell <@tgivan.com>: > When I ran openssl-0.9.5a's "make test", the tmp.bntest file tha

RE: BN functions and Solaris 7 'bc' disagree

2000-05-01 Thread Michael Wojcik
> -Original Message- > From: Ted Powell [mailto:"Ted Powell Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 5:59 PM > When I ran openssl-0.9.5a's "make test", the tmp.bntest file that was > written contained (out of 1800+ tests) seven expressions > which Solaris 7's 'bc' evaluated to give non-zero results

Re: BN functions and Solaris 7 'bc' disagree

2000-05-01 Thread Ted Powell
>Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 20:51:01 +0200 >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bodo Moeller) >To: Ted Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Ted Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> When I ran openssl-0.9.5a's "make test", the tmp.bntest file that was >> written contained (out of 1800+ tests) seven expressions which Solaris

Re: BN functions and Solaris 7 'bc' disagree

2000-05-02 Thread cFischer
On Mon-01.05.00-09:55, Ted Powell wrote: > Whatever the limits of the Solaris bc are, I would expect to get something > like the following (actual Solaris output) when they are reached: > $ bc > 10^1 what is all this math-tender for in the first place? are these calculations that a p

Re: BN functions and Solaris 7 'bc' disagree

2000-05-02 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
From: cFischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ino-waiting> On Mon-01.05.00-09:55, Ted Powell wrote: ino-waiting> > Whatever the limits of the Solaris bc are, I would expect to get something ino-waiting> > like the following (actual Solaris output) when they are reached: ino-waiting> > $ bc ino-waiting>

RE: BN functions and Solaris 7 'bc' disagree

2000-05-02 Thread Michael Wojcik
> -Original Message- > From: cFischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 01, 2000 7:32 PM > > what is all this math-tender for in the first place? are these > calculations that a public-key cryptosystem has to be capable of? i dont > run openssl (or ssleay or rsa-c) at the m

Re: BN functions and Solaris 7 'bc' disagree

2000-05-05 Thread ino-waiting
> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker (Wed 03.0500-19:09): > e and n constitute the public key, d constitutes the private key > (actually, d and n, but since the private key blob usually includes > the public key as well, this isn't really said :-)). ok. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]