: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org]
On Behalf Of Michael S. Zick
Sent: 18 January 2012 18:00
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Failing to build OpenSSL 1.0.0f on obsolete Debian box (i386,
kernel 2.0.36)
On Wed January 18 2012, William A. Rowe Jr
Subject: Re: Failing to build OpenSSL 1.0.0f on obsolete Debian box (i386,
kernel 2.0.36)
On Wed January 18 2012, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/18/2012 9:57 AM, Brooke, Simon wrote:
Sadly, removing -fomit-frame-pointer does not work.
Isn't that the default behavior for -O3
On 1/18/2012 12:00 PM, Brooke, Simon wrote:
Hi
We have a box running Debian 2.1 still in production, and for complicated
reasons we can't replace it immediately. I'm trying to compile OpenSSH for it,
and to do that I need to compile OpenSSL. The issue I'm seeing is very similar
to that
report back if I have any success.
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org]
On Behalf Of Jakob Bohm
Sent: 18 January 2012 11:37
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Failing to build OpenSSL 1.0.0f on obsolete Debian box (i386
On Wed January 18 2012, Jakob Bohm wrote:
On 1/18/2012 12:00 PM, Brooke, Simon wrote:
Hi
We have a box running Debian 2.1 still in production, and for complicated
reasons we can't replace it immediately. I'm trying to compile OpenSSH for
it, and to do that I need to compile OpenSSL.
On 1/18/2012 1:54 PM, Michael S. Zick wrote:
On Wed January 18 2012, Jakob Bohm wrote:
On 1/18/2012 12:00 PM, Brooke, Simon wrote:
Hi
We have a box running Debian 2.1 still in production, and for complicated
reasons we can't replace it immediately. I'm trying to compile OpenSSH for it,
and
On Wed January 18 2012, Jakob Bohm wrote:
On 1/18/2012 1:54 PM, Michael S. Zick wrote:
On Wed January 18 2012, Jakob Bohm wrote:
On 1/18/2012 12:00 PM, Brooke, Simon wrote:
Hi
We have a box running Debian 2.1 still in production, and for complicated
reasons we can't replace it
On Wed January 18 2012, Michael S. Zick wrote:
On Wed January 18 2012, Jakob Bohm wrote:
On 1/18/2012 1:54 PM, Michael S. Zick wrote:
On Wed January 18 2012, Jakob Bohm wrote:
On 1/18/2012 12:00 PM, Brooke, Simon wrote:
Hi
We have a box running Debian 2.1 still in production, and
Subject: Re: Failing to build OpenSSL 1.0.0f on obsolete Debian box (i386,
kernel 2.0.36)
On Wed January 18 2012, Jakob Bohm wrote:
On 1/18/2012 1:54 PM, Michael S. Zick wrote:
On Wed January 18 2012, Jakob Bohm wrote:
On 1/18/2012 12:00 PM, Brooke, Simon wrote:
Hi
We have a box
On 1/18/2012 9:57 AM, Brooke, Simon wrote:
Sadly, removing -fomit-frame-pointer does not work.
Isn't that the default behavior for -O3?
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support
On Wed January 18 2012, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/18/2012 9:57 AM, Brooke, Simon wrote:
Sadly, removing -fomit-frame-pointer does not work.
Isn't that the default behavior for -O3?
On GCC - yes.
OP is using the ancestor of what is now known as GCC.
The answer was in another
11 matches
Mail list logo
