I see the point. Thanks alot
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Mounir IDRASSI
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When calling RSA_private_encrypt with RSA_NO_PADDING, the input must have
> the same size as the RSA key modulus.
> In your case, you are supplying 20 bytes whereas it certainly needs more
> (for exam
Hi,
When calling RSA_private_encrypt with RSA_NO_PADDING, the input must
have the same size as the RSA key modulus.
In your case, you are supplying 20 bytes whereas it certainly needs more
(for example, for a 1024 bit key, input must be 128 bytes long). So, you
have to add some sort of paddi
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010, anhpham wrote:
>
> Hi all :x
> I encountered an error when using function RSA_private_encrypt with
> RSA_NO_PADDING option.
> I had an unsigned char array a with length = 20, RSA* r,
> unsigned char* sig = (unsigned char*) malloc(RSA_size(r)) and then I invoked
> function i
se help me :-<
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/RSA_private_encrypt-does-not-work-with-RSA_NO_PADDING-option-tp29204310p29204310.html
Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Op
s.
Please help me :-<
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Function-RSA_private_encrypt-does-not-work-with-RSA_NO_PADDING-option-tp29202949p29202949.html
Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive
