Re: [openssl-users] sha256 digest support in v102l build missing; present in v110f. missing build flag?

Jan 2017 $ openssl help [...] Message Digest commands (see the `dgst' command for more details) md4 md5 mdc2 rmd160 sha sha1 [...] $ openssl dgst -sha256 .bash_history SHA256(.bash_history)= b8f9308c4b9141993b4af1cee6cdffe36339bc2e05c0bf16206f9944

Re: [openssl-users] sha256 digest support in v102l build missing; present in v110f. missing build flag?

/usr/local/openssl10/bin/openssl dgst -sha256 /tmp/test.txt SHA256(/tmp/test.txt)= e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855 /usr/local/openssl11/bin/openssl dgst -sha256 /tmp/test.txt SHA256(/tmp/test.txt)= e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca49

Re: [openssl-users] sha256 digest support in v102l build missing; present in v110f. missing build flag?

> Then I've misunderstood the presence of the "-DSHA256_ASM" flag. > > What's it specifically used for? To remind me to double-check my answers? :( Sorry, they are present. The difference is that the help message in 1.0.2 isn't complete. Did you try the commands directly? -- openssl-users

Re: [openssl-users] sha256 digest support in v102l build missing; present in v110f. missing build flag?

On 30/05/2017 17:20, PGNet Dev wrote: I'm building separate local instances of latest Openssl v1.1.0 & v1.0.2 on linux64, to keep not-yet-v110-compliant apps happy. The results are both functional, but the v102l build is missing sha{224|256|384|512} digests v 1.0.2l

Re: [openssl-users] sha256 digest support in v102l build missing; present in v110f. missing build flag?

On 5/30/17 8:25 AM, Salz, Rich wrote: The results are both functional, but the v102l build is missing sha{224|256|384|512} digests Right; those digests are not in 1.0.2 Then I've misunderstood the presence of the "-DSHA256_ASM" flag. What's it specifically used for? -- openssl-users

Re: [openssl-users] sha256 digest support in v102l build missing; present in v110f. missing build flag?

> The results are both functional, but the v102l build is missing > sha{224|256|384|512} digests Right; those digests are not in 1.0.2 -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

[openssl-users] sha256 digest support in v102l build missing; present in v110f. missing build flag?

I'm building separate local instances of latest Openssl v1.1.0 & v1.0.2 on linux64, to keep not-yet-v110-compliant apps happy. The results are both functional, but the v102l build is missing sha{224|256|384|512} digests v 1.0.2l /usr/local/openssl10/bin/openssl version

Re: [openssl-users] openssl dgst -sha256 - result differs from Bouncycastle SHA256 digest for same input

Maybe different encodings like here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6839969/md5-hash-with-different-results 2016-10-25 7:36 GMT+02:00 shanthi thomas : > Hi, > I read that this happens because openssl is treating the input as > characters as opposed to binary data. But

[openssl-users] openssl dgst -sha256 - result differs from Bouncycastle SHA256 digest for same input

Hi,    I read that this happens because openssl is treating the input as characters as opposed to binary data. But how do I rectify it so that openssl gives the same digest output as BouncyCastle?  thanks,Elizabeth-- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe:

Re: [openssl-users] SHA256() to EVP_* ?

Even a small convenience is still a convenience. And eventually they add up. Thanks for the comments - it's appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/SHA256-to-EVP-tp57774p57826.html Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [openssl-users] SHA256() to EVP_* ?

From: openssl-users On Behalf Of jonetsu Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 10:07 snip The man page (the one online from OpenSSL project - SHA256.html) gives a description using SHA1() which computes a message digest. Note this is the same page for SHA{1,224,256,384,512}{,_Init,_Update,_Final

Re: [openssl-users] SHA256() to EVP_* ?

Thanks for the comments. If you are implementing HMAC, perhaps for PBKDF2 (which does that prehash-if-too-long), I hope you mean the code does... Yes it does. The man page (the one online from OpenSSL project - SHA256.html) gives a description using SHA1() which computes a message digest

Re: [openssl-users] SHA256() to EVP_* ?

From: openssl-users On Behalf Of jonetsu Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 13:53 What would be the equivalent of the SHA256() function in the EVP class of methods ? EVP_sha256() could be it, although from the short description in manual page it does not seemingly fit in, returning a EVP_MD

[openssl-users] SHA256() to EVP_* ?

Hello, What would be the equivalent of the SHA256() function in the EVP class of methods ? EVP_sha256() could be it, although from the short description in manual page it does not seemingly fit in, returning a EVP_MD which is, if not mistaken, a env_md_st structure. The code I'm adapting to EVP

[openssl-users] SHA256 docs

Please consider including other message digest algorithms like sha256 For example here: https://www.openssl.org/docs/apps/ca.html Thank you! Szépe Viktor -- +36-20-4242498 s...@szepe.net skype: szepe.viktor Budapest, XX. kerület ___

openssl and sha256 and bug CVE-2005-1730

What version of openssl started supporting sha256 ? Also in what version of openssl was bug CVE-2005-1730 no longer an issue? I have version OpenSSL 0.9.7d and above. Thanks for any info. Nick Patetta

Re: openssl and SHA256

From: Scott Wilson excell...@hotmail.com Date: 01/18/2012 01:52 PM Does openssl support SHA256? Yes If SHA256 is supported, how do I get it to work? Thanks!! SHA256_Init/Update/Final()

Re: openssl and SHA256

it was there. Subject: Re: openssl and SHA256 From: w...@omnigroup.com Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:03:38 -0800 To: openssl-users@openssl.org On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Scott Wilson wrote: Does openssl support SHA256? Yes, it does. I'm not sure why it doesn't show up in the output of list

openssl and SHA256

Does openssl support SHA256? Current version: OpenSSL 1.0.0e 6 Sep 2011 This would indicate that it does not: root@ubuntu:/# openssl list-message-digest-commands md4 md5 rmd160 sha sha1 This document (http://www.openssl.org/docs/apps/openssl.html) however lists it as a MESSAGE DIGEST

Re: openssl and SHA256

On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Scott Wilson wrote: Does openssl support SHA256? Yes, it does. I'm not sure why it doesn't show up in the output of list-message-digest-commands or the usage message, but openssl sha256 will compute a SHA256 digest, and openssl dgst --help lists

RE: openssl and SHA256

: default_md = sha256. Anyway, I'm just wondering which version began supporting SHA256 or what's wrong with my command such that it signs with SHA1? Thanks again! Subject: Re: openssl and SHA256 From: w...@omnigroup.com Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:03:38 -0800 To: openssl-users@openssl.org

Re: openssl 0.8.9h sha256

On Thu August 14 2008 23:05, Rafiqul Ahsan wrote: Hi David, I believe 2048 could not be the issue (as you said because I am using 64 bit OS), Which will probably run either 32bit or 64bit userland code. Next question: Are you running 64bit openSSL? (You could be running 32bit openSSL and

Re: openssl 0.8.9h sha256

Mike, I have installed openssl on 64 bit OS. I believe 64-bit libraries produced by default if we try to build OpenSSL on a 64-bit platform. I would still like to verify whether the installed openssl is 32, or 64 bit . Can you please let me know the necessary commands to verify it ? On

Re: openssl 0.8.9h sha256

Hi Sergio, I tried with SHA1, and it is working just fine (Signature Algorithm: sha1WithRSAEncryption). Now, sha256 is not really working...is really openssl 0.9.8h supports this advanced algorithm ? I have given the output as below...but freeradius suggests that with the patch it should work

Re: openssl 0.8.9h sha256

Sergio wrote: For the other side, i don't know anything about WiMAX, but i suposse that credentials are the same. Hope this helps __ I do. WiMAX certs (the ones uses in EAP-TLS and EAP-TTLS sessions over the airlink to

Re: openssl 0.8.9h sha256

Hi David, Thanks for your reply...I believe I am running Freeradius, and openssl0.9.8h on 64 bit OS. If you want I can post the certs output as well. Pls let me know. I need to make this working, and I have been working on this for last 2 weeks and seeing the same error. Here is the command used

Re: openssl 0.8.9h sha256

Hi David, I believe 2048 could not be the issue (as you said because I am using 64 bit OS), this is about supporting sha256 algorithm either with 0.9.8h, or my Freeradius 2.0.5 (both are latest). Because sha1 works well with my installation with even RSA 2048 key. And ofcourse, as per my previous

Re: openssl 0.8.9h sha256

We saw these same errors in a WiMAX test network with Free Radius. Moving from an older 32 bit Fedora to a current 64 bit Fedora and the stock freeradius and freeradius-util packages made it work and made the errors you exhibit disappear. openssl0.9.8h manifestly does support the necessary

Re: openssl 0.8.9h sha256

Rafiqul Ahsan escribió: Found a previous postings like this where Alan Dekok answered that FreeRadius use SSL from openssl, and if SSL supports any advanced algorithm FreeRadius should support it (I actually added a patch to FreeRadius to make sure this supports all digests). I am currently

Re: openssl 0.8.9h sha256

Thanks, I will try to figure out as you suggested. Rafi On 8/13/08, Sergio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rafiqul Ahsan escribió: Found a previous postings like this where Alan Dekok answered that FreeRadius use SSL from openssl, and if SSL supports any advanced algorithm FreeRadius should

RE: openssl 0.8.9h sha256

Ahsan Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 7:19 PM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: openssl 0.8.9h sha256 Thanks, I will try to figure out as you suggested. Rafi On 8/13/08, Sergio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rafiqul Ahsan escribió: Found a previous postings like this where Alan Dekok

Re: openssl 0.8.9h sha256

Rafiqul Ahsan escribió: I see an error like below when trying to use EAP_TLS/TTLS authentication with Certs that has Signature Algorithm: sha256WithRSAEncryption . Can anybody tell me why SSL does not like the TLS session ? I would appreciate your help. here is the radiusd -X log: ++[suffix]

Re: openssl 0.8.9h sha256

Found a previous postings like this where Alan Dekok answered that FreeRadius use SSL from openssl, and if SSL supports any advanced algorithm FreeRadius should support it (I actually added a patch to FreeRadius to make sure this supports all digests). I am currently trying to find out whether I

openssl 0.8.9h sha256

I see an error like below when trying to use EAP_TLS/TTLS authentication with Certs that has Signature Algorithm: sha256WithRSAEncryption . Can anybody tell me why SSL does not like the TLS session ? I would appreciate your help. here is the radiusd -X log: ++[suffix] returns noop rlm_eap: EAP