Hi Dan
Matt
Thank you for your comment in launchpad
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1031096
Quantum team get consensus in a Netstack meeting today to propose
port-id for requested networks. I took the job.
At first, i thought i can write extension for this. But as you say
we
I would not assume that *-paste.ini files always need to be there...
Paste is a pain point if we are to support Python 3 one day, so it's
also on the black list of the (still inexistant) OpenStack Python3
advocacy group.
Who else is interested in contributing to Python 3 support in a future
Hi, all
When I'm trying to add support to python nova-client to list/update
flavor extra specs, I noticed that the flavor extra_specs API extension use the
flavor ID to access database API, while the corresponding parameter should be
instance_type id.
I create a bug for it at
On 07/29/2012 07:47 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
Hey!
This might be fairly tricky to fix properly given the design of the
devstack gate. I could be wrong, it might not be terrible now that we
can release new client lib versions to PyPI more quickly. The devstack
gate explicitly tests proposed
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Nati Ueno nati.u...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dan
Matt
Thank you for your comment in launchpad
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1031096
Quantum team get consensus in a Netstack meeting today to propose
port-id for requested networks. I took the
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 07:14 +0200, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote:
On 07/30/2012 09:35 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote:
That said, be aware that there is a reset-state command to novaclient,
so that you can do Chris's recommended reset without having to muck
around with the database directly.
Hi Wolfgang,
Have you updated the your python-novaclient? The 'nova reset-state server
--active' command is pretty much there. It is an admin action in Nova
extensions.
$ nova help | grep reset
reset-state Reset the state of an instance
Regards,
Rohit Karajgi | Lead Engineer |
Adgenda Items for Openstack/Hyper-V Meeting
* Status of the Mock Hyper-V Compute
* Move from Essex to Folsom
o Installer is for essex integration
* Hyper-V Testing Procedures
o Dev stack for hyper-v testing
o Chef for Windows automation
Peter J. Pouliot,
Sorry for a dumb question, but can someone point me to where the authorization
is configured to determine who does and doesn't get access to these actions
please ?
Thanks,
Phil
-Original Message-
From: openstack-bounces+philip.day=hp@lists.launchpad.net
Hi Phil,
You might want to look at
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/interim-nova-authz-service
https://github.com/openstack/nova/commits/master/etc/nova/policy.json
Regards,
Rohit Karajgi | Lead Engineer | NTT Data Global Technology Services Private Ltd
| w. +91.20.6604.1500 x 378
Here's the url's to the log and minutes from today's meeting.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-07-31-15.00.html
Minutes (text):
I see. I am running Ubuntu 12.04. I do need them physically isolated
since the primary purpose for my cluster is for use with some experimental
network hardware.
Thanks for your reply. I'll see what I can find.
-Mark
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Mark Lehrer m...@knm.org wrote:
compute
For now it is fine to put it in the same place where network_id is specified.
In the nova meeting on Thursday, we are going to discuss a better way to do
extensions that need to do things based on additional post params.
Vish
On Jul 31, 2012, at 12:30 AM, Nati Ueno nati.u...@gmail.com wrote:
The heat developers are happy to announce the release of new version of
Heat.
Heat is a project designed for OpenStack that implements AWS
CloudFormation. CloudFormation is a programmable interface and
tempalting system for orchestrating multiple cloud applications.
Try it out on Fedora 17:
Hi Vish
Thanks. I got it.
2012/7/31 Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com:
For now it is fine to put it in the same place where network_id is specified.
In the nova meeting on Thursday, we are going to discuss a better way to do
extensions that need to do things based on additional post
Two ways that I can think of...
1) disable forwarding on the NC, not sure if this would impact regular services.
2) add additional rules, something like -s 10.10.10.0/24 -d 10.0.0.0/8 drop.
-Simon
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Wael Ghandour (wghandou)
wghan...@cisco.com wrote:
We are also
Stefano,
If a subscriber reply to a mailing list message, it's sent to the
author only. Each subscriber should use Reply to All every time, to
post a reply to mailing list.
Can you please configure the mailing list and set reply-to header as
mailing list address, openstack@lists.launchpad.net.
+1
On Jul 31, 2012 10:52 AM, Bhuvaneswaran A bhu...@apache.org wrote:
Stefano,
If a subscriber reply to a mailing list message, it's sent to the
author only. Each subscriber should use Reply to All every time, to
post a reply to mailing list.
Can you please configure the mailing list and
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012, Bhuvaneswaran A bhu...@apache.org wrote:
If a subscriber reply to a mailing list message, it's sent to the
author only. Each subscriber should use Reply to All every time, to
post a reply to mailing list.
Can you please configure the mailing list and set reply-to header
On 07/31/2012 02:09 PM, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012, Bhuvaneswaran A bhu...@apache.org wrote:
If a subscriber reply to a mailing list message, it's sent to the
author only. Each subscriber should use Reply to All every time, to
post a reply to mailing list.
Can you please
This is a reminder that the client in glance is deprecated and will not ship
with Folsom. Horizon and Devstack both use python-glanceclient, and I'm
presently working on updating Nova.
I also wanted to point out that I just released python-glanceclient v0.2.0 and
would love to gather some
Communication should be blocked via security groups, but perhaps you want more
complete isolation. The network host (which in this case is the compute host)
will be able to route packets between subnets even though they are on different
networks, so you will need to drop packets between vlans.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:50:02AM -0700, Bhuvaneswaran A wrote:
Stefano,
If a subscriber reply to a mailing list message, it's sent to the
author only. Each subscriber should use Reply to All every time, to
post a reply to mailing list.
Can you please configure the mailing list and set
On 07/31/2012 02:13 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
As a counter-point, I'd prefer to keep the list as it is and *not* munge
Reply-To.
Since Chip summarizes it better than I can, I'll link to his article
'Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful':
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
++
Just use
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.comwrote:
This discussion invariably turns up on most open source mailing lists
from time to time. People never agree on the best setting. Asking
for this reply-to setting to be changed is merely shifting the pain
away from
That being said, I realize we're entering mostly a land of religion here.
So I'll just end with a long live emacs! to try to get us to the godwin
rule as fast as possible.
The Nazis had Headers too.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:50:02AM -0700, Bhuvaneswaran A wrote:
Stefano,
If a subscriber reply to a mailing list message, it's sent to the
author only. Each subscriber should use Reply to All every time, to
post a reply to mailing list.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Alex Glikson glik...@il.ibm.com wrote:
This discussion invariably turns up on most open source mailing lists
from time to time. People never agree on the best setting. Asking
for this reply-to setting to be changed is merely shifting the pain
away from one set
I'm sure Launchpad doesn't support user level configuration, to edit
email headers.
We're moving off of launchpad to mailman proper anyways.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe :
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 11:41 -0700, Brian Waldon wrote:
released python-glanceclient v0.2.0 and would love to gather some
feedback. Please file bugs on the python-glanceclient project in
launchpad if you find anything to be missing.
What is the plan to deal with the fact that the user interface
On Jul 31, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 11:41 -0700, Brian Waldon wrote:
released python-glanceclient v0.2.0 and would love to gather some
feedback. Please file bugs on the python-glanceclient project in
launchpad if you find anything to be missing.
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 15:17 -0700, Brian Waldon wrote:
On Jul 31, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 11:41 -0700, Brian Waldon wrote:
released python-glanceclient v0.2.0 and would love to gather some
feedback. Please file bugs on the python-glanceclient
On Jul 31, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Brian Waldon bcwal...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a reminder that the client in glance is deprecated and will not ship
with Folsom. Horizon and Devstack both use python-glanceclient, and I'm
presently working on updating Nova.
I also wanted to point out that I
I think we're running out of opportunities to do stuff like this.
This is exactly the sort of thing that will drive George Reese into a
homocidal rage. More to the point its exactly the sort of thing our users
are going to despise us for. And that hatred will outlive any benefit.
Users only
On 08/01/2012 12:49 AM, Matt Joyce wrote:
I think we're running out of opportunities to do stuff like this.
This is exactly the sort of thing that will drive George Reese into a
homocidal rage. More to the point its exactly the sort of thing our
users are going to despise us for. And that
On Jul 31, 2012, at 9:49 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
I think we're running out of opportunities to do stuff like this.
This is exactly the sort of thing that will drive George Reese into a
homocidal rage. More to the point its exactly the sort of thing our users
are going to despise us for.
at 20120731
Title: quantal_folsom_cinder_trunk
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/quantal_folsom_cinder_trunk/25/Project:quantal_folsom_cinder_trunkDate of build:Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:31:54 -0400Build duration:18 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt
at 20120731
39 matches
Mail list logo
