Hi everyone,
The Gold Members completed their election today. DLA Piper administered the
election and has passed along the results. The eight elected companies and the
individuals they intend to appoint to the board are listed alphabetically below:
Cisco - Lew Tucker
Cloudscaling - Randy Bias
D
today or tomorrow on that to send out. I am not sure that it would have
prevented this situation as it involves behavior outside of the mechanics of
the nominations.
Jonathan
>
>
> Rick
>
>
>
> On 07/29/2012 01:18 AM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
>> The OpenStack Foundation h
The OpenStack Foundation has already attracted over 2,000 Individual Members in
a little over a week. It's a very exciting moment for all of us involved in
this effort, but also brings responsibility for each Individual and Corporate
member.
We've learned that someone may have violated the basi
On Jul 27, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> Sorry if it's already been made clear somewhere, but I'm unsure for
> what term these individuals are being elected? The bylaws say that the
> election happens each year in the first two weeks of January, so is
> this an election to fill the seats
On Jul 26, 2012, at 6:05 PM, Lloyd Dewolf wrote:
> Who receives email sent to secret...@openstack.org? Sorry, I missed
> who is the acting secretary. It might be nice to include the person's
> name on the page:
> http://www.openstack.org/community/openstack-foundation-board-2012-election-candidate
Hi everyone,
Last Wednesday we started accepting Individual Members for the OpenStack
Foundation. We've had an excellent response so far with well over 1,000
Individual Members joining in the first week. I wanted to share some important
information about how to nominate and elect the Individua
Hi everyone,
We've been making great progress on the formation of the OpenStack Foundation:
Individual Members can register now at http://openstack.org/join.
The drafting committee has completed their work, and we have a complete set of
legal documents. Our Bylaws, with appendices, and Member
Thanks, Nick. I've added it to the agenda for next Tuesday's meeting at 20:00
UTC/3:00 PM CDT. If you can join the meeting to field any questions, that would
be helpful.
Jonathan
On Jul 5, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Nick Barcet wrote:
> Dear members of the Project Policy Board,
>
> After 3 month of
Hi Josh,
We'll be sending out a survey after the conference wraps up and would love to
collect your feedback. We also read emails, wiki pages, blog posts, tweets,
postal mail and sky writing if you have a different preferred method of
providing it.
Jonathan.
Joshua Harlow wrote:
>Hi all,
>
In the wiki, we had laid out a target of the 1/3's being 4-5 members, so that
puts the target in 12-15 range. I think it's a reasonable size that allows
broad representation. I agree with Sean 20+ begins to be less effective.
In the current proposal with the Affiliate Member class, I'd imagine t
an Francisco or Sunnyvale. Just let me
>> know how many people and how long. If need be, I can also order some pizzas
>> or sandwiches.
>>
>> Thanks & Regards
>> Raja Srinivasan
>>
>> From: Sean Roberts
>> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 08:55:31
On Mar 9, 2012, at 5:00 PM, Devin Carlen wrote:
> Mark, one thing that I am curious about - there doesn't seem to be language
> in the foundation structure document that would prevent "individual" members
> from organizations that are also "strategic" members from also being on the
> board. Is
> On Friday, March 9, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Thor Wolpert wrote:
>
>> I thought a Foundation that paid for legal, marketing and core
>> services; along with a hosted set of projects whose membership was
>> based upon meritocracy was the model.
That is and always has been the plan and can be seen in th
Hi everyone,
Last week at the conference in Boston we had a great session talking about
project governance and the creation of a foundation for OpenStack. One of the
to-do items out of the meeting was setting up some group communication methods
for ongoing discussion. The first piece is a maili
After the mailing list discussion around APIs a few weeks back, several
community members asked the Project Policy Board to come up with a position on
APIs. The conclusion of the PPB was that each project's PTL will own the
definition and implementation of the project's official API, and APIs ac
This is on the agenda for Tuesday's policy board meeting (in #openstack-meeting
1 hour before the weekly OpenStack team meeting for those interested). Sounds
like a potentially acceptable solution is to set some cross-project API
standards and then push the remainder of the API definition and im
Hi everyone,
Since the Design Summit, the OpenStack Project Policy Board has been working to
refine how new projects become an official part of OpenStack. Over the past few
weeks, we've approved several policies and processes to create a more standard
method for OpenStack project expansion.
Pr
The OpenStack Project Oversight Committee (POC) was formed at the end of last
year. The committee is a mixture of appointed and community elected members who
fill nine seats. The current members are Jesse Andrews, Jonathan Bryce, Rick
Clark, Soren Hansen, Mark Interrante, Vish Ishaya, Joshua
18 matches
Mail list logo
