Re: [Openstack] [openstack][quantum] stuck subnet

2013-04-25 Thread Vinay Bannai
> =zq/V > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > ___ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net

[Openstack] [Quantum} using network id for booting a vm

2012-11-25 Thread Vinay Bannai
I see that when booting a vm using nova cli command, the "--nic net-id" option takes a network id. What is the rationale behind that? Why is not a subnet-id? -- Vinay Bannai Email: vban...@gmail.com Google Voice: 415 938 7576 ___ Mailing l

Re: [Openstack] [Nova] use the wrong deleted flavor when boot an instance after creating flavor with same flavorid as the deleted one

2012-11-08 Thread Vinay Bannai
Look at the following bugs for context https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/981263 https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1057799 On Nov 8, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Wangpan wrote: Hi all, I use the folsom openstack recently. I found a problem that when I delete a flavor by using 'nova-manage flavor

Re: [Openstack] how to use extra_specs??

2012-11-05 Thread Vinay Bannai
__ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > -- Vinay Bannai Email: vban...@gmail.com Google Voice: 415 938

Re: [Openstack] [quantum] Relationship between br-int and physical bridge mapping in OVS plugin

2012-11-05 Thread Vinay Bannai
do not forward VLAN 1 > frames by default. > > -- > > ** ** > > This is the problem we were running into when setting up multi node > deployment. Not sure if it helps or not. > > ** ** > > Dennis Qin > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *Fr

Re: [Openstack] [quantum] Relationship between br-int and physical bridge mapping in OVS plugin

2012-11-05 Thread Vinay Bannai
vlan Thanks Vinay On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Vinay Bannai wrote: > >> I have a multi node setup. The CC controller doubles up as the quantum >> server and also has the l3 agent and DHCP. I have config

[Openstack] [quantum] Relationship between br-int and physical bridge mapping in OVS plugin

2012-11-04 Thread Vinay Bannai
I have a multi node setup. The CC controller doubles up as the quantum server and also has the l3 agent and DHCP. I have configured OVS as my L2 plugin with vlan tunneling. On the compute nodes, I see that in addition to having the integration bridge (br-int) you will also need the ovs physical bri

Re: [Openstack] Why OpenStack use openvpn?

2012-10-25 Thread Vinay Bannai
kind of arch question, like how to >> choose a right opensource software. On the other way, please let me know >> your point why we don't choose IPSEC or other VPNs. >> >> >> It was somewhat arbitrary based on the fact that it is easy to setup on >> linux and t

Re: [Openstack] Use of MAC addresses in Openstack VMs

2012-10-23 Thread Vinay Bannai
+1 from my end. This was basically what we discussed at the quantum design session. I think you put it more eloquently. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 23, 2012, at 1:36 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Nachi Ueno wrote: >> My proposal is the default OUI value should be owned by OpenStack >> foundation i

Re: [Openstack] Use of MAC addresses in Openstack VMs

2012-10-20 Thread Vinay Bannai
be sufficient for > many use cases, without the need for a globally assigned one. > > Regards, > Salvatore > > On 20 October 2012 04:05, Vinay Bannai wrote: > >> I was talking to Nachi and Gary during the Quantum design session about >> the need to have a prope

[Openstack] Use of MAC addresses in Openstack VMs

2012-10-19 Thread Vinay Bannai
I was talking to Nachi and Gary during the Quantum design session about the need to have a proper MAC OUI allocation scheme for Openstack development folks. They suggested that I send it out for wider discussion on the mailing list. It turns out that it would be useful for the Openstack foundation

Re: [Openstack] 回复: Can openstack guarantee each VM network bandwidth

2012-09-11 Thread Vinay Bannai
o : openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > > ___ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Un

Re: [Openstack] [Nova] Instance Type Extra Specs clarifications

2012-09-09 Thread Vinay Bannai
t; on an instance_type (or, flavor). > > ** ** > > Thanks**** > > --jyh > > ** ** > > *From:* Vinay Bannai [mailto:vban...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Sunday, September 09, 2012 6:26 AM > *To:* Jiang, Yunhong > *Cc:* Dugger, Donald D; Patrick Petit; openstack@lists.launchpad.ne

Re: [Openstack] [Nova] Instance Type Extra Specs clarifications

2012-09-08 Thread Vinay Bannai
Sorry Yunhong, it was my mistake. I was able to get it to work with your changes. I am a little confused by the terminology of "instance_id" and "flavor_id" in the tables. Either their meaning is crossed or I am not reading it right. Vinay On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 12:02 PM,

Re: [Openstack] [Nova] Instance Type Extra Specs clarifications

2012-09-08 Thread Vinay Bannai
; > Thanks > > --jyh > > ** ** > > *From:* Dugger, Donald D > *Sent:* Saturday, September 08, 2012 4:28 AM > *To:* Vinay Bannai; Patrick Petit; Jiang, Yunhong > *Cc:* openstack@lists.launchpad.net (openstack@lists.launchpad.net) > *Subject:* RE: [Openstack] [Nova] Instance

Re: [Openstack] [Nova] Instance Type Extra Specs clarifications

2012-09-07 Thread Vinay Bannai
> specs table, otherwise your key will create problems with some of the > scheduler filters. > > ** ** > > -- > > Don Dugger > > "Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale > > Ph: 303/443-3786 > > ** ** > > *From:* Vin

Re: [Openstack] [Nova] Instance Type Extra Specs clarifications

2012-09-07 Thread Vinay Bannai
ability advertising is less clearer. Is it assumed >> that the key/value pairs are always declared statically as flags in >> nova.conf of the compute node, or can they be generated dynamically and if >> so, who would that be? And also, are the keys completely free form strings >&