On Wed, 09 May 2012 18:18:52 +0200
Ionuț Arțăriși iartar...@suse.cz wrote:
It would be great to have it on 1.2b3, though.
I think I had a pretty good start, here:
https://review.openstack.org/7569
Not sure if I am doing the right thing, however. I split it like this:
- Proxy server does a
Hi Pete,
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Pete Zaitcev zait...@redhat.com wrote:
on adapting Swift for WebOb 1.2 and if a patch is available somewhere.
I see Ionut fixed lp:984042, but clearly it wasn't enough.
If nobody's done it yet, I suppose I could take a swing at it. New webob
I started
On 05/09/2012 05:45 AM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
I ran .unittests on a box with python-webob-1.2b3 and it throws left
and right: errors=72, failures=6. I'm wondering if anyone is working
on adapting Swift for WebOb 1.2 and if a patch is available somewhere.
I see Ionut fixed lp:984042, but clearly it
On Wed, 9 May 2012 16:14:48 +0100
Chmouel Boudjnah chmo...@chmouel.com wrote:
The challenge if you are taking a stab at it would probably be to
support webob 1.1* and 1.2 at the same time in the code.
I noticed that too. 1.1.1 made some intermediate choices that are
difficult to reconcile,
I ran .unittests on a box with python-webob-1.2b3 and it throws left
and right: errors=72, failures=6. I'm wondering if anyone is working
on adapting Swift for WebOb 1.2 and if a patch is available somewhere.
I see Ionut fixed lp:984042, but clearly it wasn't enough.
If nobody's done it yet, I
5 matches
Mail list logo
