On 02/04/2015 06:06 PM, Thai Q Tran wrote:
As we're moving toward Angular, might make sense for us to adopt ngdoc
as well.
I don't think it makes much sense. We don't have any style guide for the
JavaScript documentation simply because it's not needed. We don't really
have any for Python either
Hi Daniel,
Yes, there's some semantic meaning at that level. But this level already
exists at the current rootwrap caller site, too - and if that one can be
tricked to do something against image.img rm -rf /, then the additional
layer can be tricked, too.
No, that is really not
Hi,
is there a central place where I can find a matrix (or something
similar) that shows what is currently supposed to work in the sense of
IPv6 Networking?
I also had a look at a couple of blueprints out there, but I'm looking
for a simple overview containing what's supported, on which
Il 04/02/2015 18:34, Lars Kellogg-Stedman ha scritto:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 03:20:21PM +0100, Fiorenza Meini wrote:
Please, what I'm missing and which is the neutron configuration I shall have
on the second compute node ?
If you started with a single-node Neutron configuration it is very
I do understand that and that is why I believe it should not be that way.
profile should rather be populated by the sriov-nic-switch-agent that is
running on the compute node. That way It is possible to do interface-attach
because the profile is already populated and nova doesn't have to do it and
Hi folks
May I request FFE for contrail vif driver?
This is really tiny patch which has just about 100 line including unit test.
also, it is really harmless code for the other part.
This patch uploaded 1/21 but unfortunately we couldn't get attention
for this patch.
Code
We're using image member to share images instead of public images
because we can share different images with same name for others, and
when updating images we replace members of the existing image to new
one. Then, we delete the old image when all vms using it are deleted on
hypervisors.
Hi all,
For the past few days I have been working on running volume test through my
CI, but still I am not getting any solution. I am also using the same
devstack-gate script which has the code for running the tests.
Now, I want that script to run only volume tests. So if anyone can help me
with
On 5 February 2015 at 23:07, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Avishay Traeger's message of 2015-02-04 22:19:53 -0800:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 5 February 2015 at 10:24, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com
Hi,
Mistral Kilo-2 dev milestone has been released
Release pages for Mistral and Mistral Client:
https://launchpad.net/mistral/kilo/kilo-2
https://launchpad.net/mistral/kilo/kilo-2
https://launchpad.net/python-mistralclient/kilo/kilo-2
https://launchpad.net/python-mistralclient/kilo/kilo-2
It's sent via http. Look for the nova_url parameter.[1]
1.
https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/33b83554442b7c0d862a2adb0b2a8feab1185af9/etc/neutron.conf#L267
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Akilesh K akilesh1...@gmail.com wrote:
Great this is what I was looking for and I was suspecting
Hi,
I am experimenting with heat and have a template that creates a multinic VM (3
interfaces). One interface has floating IP and connectivity outside. The
problem is that I do not know how to specify the default gateway of the VM. If
it is not to the network that has floating IP the
Nova sends a port update to Neutron after the VM has been scheduled so
Neutron can know the location of the port it needs to setup in OVS. After
Neutron finishes this setup, it notifies Nova that it has finished setting
up the port. At this point, Nova resumes the boot of the VM since network
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Andrey Kurilin akuri...@mirantis.com
wrote:
First results is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152569/
- if os-compute-api-version is not supplied don't send any header at all
- it is probably worth doing a bit version parsing to see if it makes
sense eg of
On 2/4/15, 10:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 09:10:06AM -0800, James E. Blair wrote:
Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org writes:
You make a good point when you mention traditional distro here. I
would argue that containers are slightly
Hi Devs,
This change is not backward compatible and to do not break OpenStack services
which are using cinder-client,
we need to first make provision in these consumer services to handle
cinder-client return type change.
To make this cinder-client change backward compatible we need to do
Hi,
I sent patches [1] [2] to add check-tempest-dsvm-full-glusterfs
http://logs.openstack.org/73/145173/2/experimental/check-tempest-dsvm-full-glusterfs/6b4bd70/
as an experimental job in OpenStack upstream.
Those two patches *merged* successfully.
But while issuing check experimental
Hi All,
As specified in this link:
https://openstack.redhat.com/Neutron_with_existing_external_network
network restart takes destroys and recreates br-ex which causes the
router's interface in the qrouter-* netns to be deleted, and it won't be
recreated without clearing and re-setting the
Hi,
I have a working openstack setup. But I have some questions on how I got it
working.
Initially my instances failed to launch.
I have updated the correct values for neutron authentication in nova.conf
and correct nova authentication in neutron.conf and notify_nova on port
change is true but
Hi All,
As specified in this link:
https://openstack.redhat.com/Neutron_with_existing_external_network
network restart takes destroys and recreates br-ex which causes the router's
interface in the qrouter-* netns to be deleted, and it won't be recreated
without clearing and re-setting the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
glibc 'GHOST' vulnerability can allow remote code execution
- ---
### Summary ###
A serious vulnerability in the GNU C library (glibc) gethostbyname*
functions can allow an attacker to perform remote code execution with
the privileges of the
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Akilesh K akilesh1...@gmail.com wrote:
I know that vif_type is binding_failed on a multinode setup and I also
know why it happens.
As for interface-attach I got it work for sriov ports and even verified it
works inside the instance. The trick was to specify
I am getting the following error when I give this command
neutron net-create ext-net --shared --router:external=True
error is:
Unable to establish connection to http://10.107.0.139:9696/v2.0/networks.json
10.107.0.139 is IP of Horizon.
Janki Chhatbar
M.Tech (Embedded Systems)
Nirma University
The K-2 milestone was wrapped up last night! Now we can turn our
attention to merging the rest of the features for K-3. Thanks again to
the reviewers who helped make K-2 possible.
And a reminder to submitters: feature proposal freeze is in exactly 4
weeks. That means any new feature not
On 02/04/2015 01:13 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Tristan Cacqueray's message of 2015-02-04 09:02:19 -0800:
On 02/04/2015 06:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
(4) I think that ultimately we need to ditch rootwrap and provide a proper
privilege separated, formal RPC mechanism for each
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 08:27 -0500, Tristan Cacqueray wrote:
Thus if we want to emulate OpenSSH design, the rpc call would also
need to
carry authentication data in order to prevent unwanted activity. And
the
rpc daemon would then need to enforce some kind of acl/policy.
Sounds a lot like
On 02/05/2015 07:01 AM, Alexandre Levine wrote:
Davanum,
We've added the devstack support. It's in our stackforge repository.
https://github.com/stackforge/ec2-api/tree/master/contrib/devstack
Best regards,
Alex Levine
I've converted it to a devstack external plugin structure in this
- Original Message -
From: Dimitri Mazmanov dimitri.mazma...@ericsson.com
To: openstack@lists.openstack.org
Hello,
The scheduling documentation [1] states that:
When evacuating instances from a host, the scheduler service does not pick
the next host. Instances are evacuated to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
glibc 'GHOST' vulnerability can allow remote code execution
- ---
### Summary ###
A serious vulnerability in the GNU C library (glibc) gethostbyname*
functions can allow an attacker to perform remote code execution with
the privileges of the
I always recommend the following:
All public images are named generically enough that they can be replaced
with a new version of the same name. This helps new instances booting.
The prior image is renamed with -OLD-$date. This lets users know that their
image has been deprecated. This image is
Hello,
Where do people obtain glance images for nova/lxc? Cloud images for KVM
can't run in LXC container because first, image should be slightly
modified (because it doesn't have its own kernel) and also it should be
single FS, not an image with partition table.
The only way which I found
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 12:32:33 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo.db][nova] TL; DR Things everybody
should know about Galera
On 05/02/15 11:01, Attila Fazekas
On 2015-02-02 14:45:53 +0300 (+0300), Alexandre Levine wrote:
On 2/2/15 12:58 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
[...]
We need to at least discuss iterate on this a few times
online, so that we can take advantage of the f2f time for any
remaining harder parts of the discussion.
[...]
how do
Hello everyone.
We are updating our public images regularly (to provide them to
customers in up-to-date state). But there is a problem: If some instance
starts from image it becomes 'used'. That means:
* That image is used as _base for nova
* If instance is reverted this image is used to
Hi all!
Recently we have discussed the log and exception translations and have not
come to a decision.
I've made some research and found a useful documents:
- https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LoggingStandards#Log_Translation
- https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Translations
Here two main
Hi Andreas
What about https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/IPv6 ?
Or are you looking for a Working Group specialized in this area? In that
case, maybe the NFV - Telco Working group can better drive your
questions (they are very concerned about IPv6 too):
I was not able to rebase my change, even when rebasing with rebase -I, ever had
a no common ancestry when pushing review
I reverted some changes and made a new patchset, and I succeded to have a
verified code :)
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147117/
Thanks for your help
-Message
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 06:02 -0800, Abel Lopez wrote:
I always recommend the following:
All public images are named generically enough that they can be
replaced with a new version of the same name. This helps new instances
booting.
The prior image is renamed with -OLD-$date. This lets users
Updated report for 'no image' with deleted '_base' behaviour in juno (my
previous comment was about havana):
1. If snapshot is removed, original image is used (image that was used
for 1st instance to produce snapshot). Rather strange and unexpected,
but nice (minus one headache).
2. If all
On 04/02/15 19:04, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 02/04/2015 12:05 PM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:30:32PM +, Matthew Booth wrote:
I've spent a few hours today reading about Galera, a clustering solution
for MySQL. Galera provides multi-master 'virtually synchronous'
Hello,
The scheduling documentation [1] states that:
When evacuating instances from a host, the scheduler service does not pick the
next host. Instances are evacuated to the host explicitly defined by the
administrator.”
The instance documentation [2] however says :
You can optionally include
I had running OPenStack 3 node architecture. I integrated OpenDayLight into
it. Compute node and control node are seen in DLUX. I am also able to
create router and networks in Horizon but not able to launch instances. The
error is as follows:
Fault
--
MessageNo valid
Hi Thai,
I agree with Anton that the names are not intuitive for users.
I would use something like:
- Local authentication (for local credentials)
- ?? (I also have no idea of what is a Default protocol)
- Authenticate using name of IdPs or federation (something which is easy
to the user
On 05/02/15 11:11, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote:
I'm still confused as to how this code got there, though. We shouldn't
be hitting Galera lock contention (reported as deadlocks) if we're using
a single master, which I thought we were. Does this mean either:
I guess we can hit a lock
Hi Nikhil et al.,
Thanks for the nomination! I’m more than happy to join the core team and do
all I can to help improve Trove and the community. Also a +1 for the other
nominations and sincere thanks for all the work hub_cap and grapex have done
over the years. Let’s keep the momentum
Everyone,
I am honored for the nomination to be part of the Trove-Core
reviewers and am ready and willing to take on the responsibility.
Thanks,
Eddie
*From:* Nikhil Manchanda [mailto:slick...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* February-05-15 8:27 AM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing
On 05/02/15 12:23, James Denton wrote:
Hello all,
Regarding
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/router-properties-object
Does anyone know if there are plans to implement this functionality in
an upcoming release?
Unlikely - unfortunately the Neutron API for extra routes makes it
Hello,
OS - Fedora 20.
I'm in the process of integrating DPDK-accelerated Open vSwitch with
OpenStack, according to the following document
https://01.org/sites/default/files/page/accelerating_openstack_networking_with_intel_architecture_rev008.pdf
% git clone
On 2/5/2015 10:54 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/05/2015 11:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:42:48AM -0600, Ed Leafe wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/05/2015 09:02 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
May I suggest stricter moderation? EG a short phase
Thai,
We could also add an option in the Horizon's settings that automatically
chooses one authentication workflow. At CERN we are trying to use websso
with use of the SAML2 protocols as much as we can. That's said we
automatically make users to use websso when they want to access their
The Oslo team is pleased to announce the *initial* release of:
debtcollector 0.1.0: A collection of python patterns that help you
collect your technical debt in a non-destructive manner.
For more details, please see the git log history below and:
Yes, we flipped to neutron default around that time, which appears to
have been premature. That's since been reverted -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/153208/ and we'll make sure that it
works out of the box before it goes default again.
On 02/05/2015 07:20 AM, Eduard Matei wrote:
Hi,
For
On 02/05/2015 04:05 PM, Roman Mashak wrote:
Hello,
OS - Fedora 20.
I'm in the process of integrating DPDK-accelerated Open vSwitch with
OpenStack, according to the following document
Thanks for your response
I ttried to rebase to get rid of the previously commit but when I do a git
review it's rejected because no common ancestry was found
Is it any way to rewind to a fresh state, ie delete abandoned review ?
-Message d'origine-
De : Clark Boylan
Hi,
I am more leaning towards layout Ioram suggested, but with
protocols/other metods (Kerberos for instance) in the dropdown box.
On 05.02.2015 17:16, Steve Martinelli wrote:
Thanks Ioram,
From the keystone side: the one issue with listing IdPs is that some may
be private, so we're now
- Original Message -
From: Przemyslaw Czesnowicz przemyslaw.czesnow...@intel.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Hi
1) If the device is a normal PCI device, but is a network card, am I
still able to
take
Hi,
I am requesting the exception for the feature Add ability to inject
routes in interfaces.template.
The potential changes in Nova are limited as the feature is opt-in.
The default interfaces.template is not changed for the reasons now
explained in the new commit message. No comment were
Hi Ioram,Thanks for the feedback. I agree that the names are hard to follow, they can change to something more intuitive. Or we can even provide a tooltip for more information.As for the look and feel, I don't agree that its easier if all the options are listed. Image if you had 5 different ways
In the case of a raw backed qcow2 image (pretty sure that¹s the default)
the instances root disk as seen inside the vm is made up of changes made
on the instance disk (qcow2 layer) + the base image (raw). Also, remember
that as currently coded a resize migration will almost always be a
migrate.
Hi all,
I'm glad to be nominated to Trove core and of course I'm willing to join
you guys. Looking forward to keep up with more and stronger contributions.
Thanks a lot!
Victoria
2015-02-05 14:17 GMT-03:00 Vipul Sabhaya vip...@gmail.com:
+1 to all the nominations. Many thanks to the
I agree with points made by both Matt and Radomir.
We have guidelines for documenting code. Any code. (* I need to go see
what our guidelines actually say) But the goal is to have comments that
are useful and make the code
easier to understand, follow and use. Comments should focus on
We do exactly this.
Public images are named very generically like Ubuntu 14.04. Not even
14.04.1 or something like that. Old images are renamed and made private.
Existing instances continue to run, but, as others have mentioned, if a
user is using a UUID to launch instances, that will break for
The pluggable IPAM [1] is intended to support the scenario you described below.
That is, a fixed IP is provided for the port by IPAM, and then the DHCP server
is programmed to return that IP for that MAC or DUID (for IPv6). If I
understand correctly, your concern then is:
1) The DHCP server
Sean Dague said on Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 09:51:30AM -0500:
As there has been a bunch of concern around patches getting lost or
stuck, I wanted to re-announce the fact that we've got a dedicated slot
at the weekly Nova meeting for just those sorts of things.
The slot turned into everyone talking
Chris Friesen said on Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:35:55PM -0600:
it can be very difficult to determine whether
a given flavor/image is bootable within the network
This implies to me that what you'd really like is to be able to ask the
scheduler whether a given flavor/image is bootable. The Gantt
That is a very real concern. This I systems from images being named very
uniquely, with versions, dates, etc. To the end user this is ALMOST as hard
as a UUID.
Easy/generic names encourage users to use them, but there is an aspect of
documentation and user training/education on the proper use of
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 06:39 -0800, Abel Lopez wrote:
That is a very real concern. This I systems from images being named
very uniquely, with versions, dates, etc. To the end user this is
ALMOST as hard as a UUID.
Easy/generic names encourage users to use them, but there is an aspect
of
Hi everyone,
The second milestone of the Kilo development cycle, kilo-2 is now
reached for the Kilo integrated release projects, Keystone, Glance,
Nova, Horizon, Neutron, Cinder, Ceilometer, Heat, Trove, Sahara, and
Ironic ! It contains all the new features and bugfixes that have been
added since
Hi everyone,
The second milestone of the Kilo development cycle, kilo-2 is now
reached for the Kilo integrated release projects, Keystone, Glance,
Nova, Horizon, Neutron, Cinder, Ceilometer, Heat, Trove, Sahara, and
Ironic ! It contains all the new features and bugfixes that have been
added since
I'm curious: are you using _base files? We're not and we're able to block
migrate instances based on deleted images or images that were public but
are now private.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Belmiro Moreira
moreira.belmiro.email.li...@gmail.com wrote:
We don't delete public images from
Thanks for response.
I have pip 6.0.8, is it too old? What version should I install to move
on with installation?
2015-02-05 16:44 GMT-05:00 Sean Dague s...@dague.net:
On 02/05/2015 04:05 PM, Roman Mashak wrote:
Hello,
OS - Fedora 20.
I'm in the process of integrating DPDK-accelerated Open
+1
welcome aboard peter + victoria + edmond!
From: Nikhil Manchanda slick...@gmail.commailto:slick...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Thursday, February 5, 2015 at
No, it's too new. Devstack in master is fixed to address those issues.
Supporting instructions that include out of tree patches in the
instructions are beyond what should be expected of from the development
list. The Intel folks that built these instructions and patches are the
ones you should be
Marek,Yep, that makes a lot of sense. Can definitely add that.-Marek Denis marek.de...@cern.ch wrote: -To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgFrom: Marek Denis marek.de...@cern.chDate: 02/05/2015 01:35PMSubject: Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][keystone]
Thai,
We
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:13:50PM +0100, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
I was always considering stuck reviews as reviews where 2 or more cores were
disagreeing between themselves so that it was needing a debate discussion
during the meeting.
I was under the same impression.
Stuck reviews were for
I've run into a set of use cases where it would really be useful to be able
to restrict which external networks a particular tenant can access, along
the lines of the wiki page [1] talks about..
When I checked for neutron blueprints, the only thing I found was [2] and
that isn't really close.
LOL :)
-- dims
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 2/5/2015 10:54 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/05/2015 11:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:42:48AM -0600, Ed Leafe wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
Le 05/02/2015 17:54, Sean Dague a écrit :
On 02/05/2015 11:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:42:48AM -0600, Ed Leafe wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/05/2015 09:02 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
May I suggest stricter moderation? EG a short phase
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:24:24AM -0600, Kurt Taylor wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi Team Nova,
This is a message to alert everyone to the fact
Angus,
I think the appropriate place would be the openstack list, possibly with the
[container] flag or [kolla] flag.
Regards
-steve
From: Angus Lees g...@inodes.orgmailto:g...@inodes.org
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Without taking anything away from this fine and sensible direction, where
_would_ be a good place to discuss more radical container-based deployments?
(I'm fine if the answer is use ad-hoc communication channels for now)
On Fri Feb 06 2015 at 7:24:12 AM Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com
Hi,
FFE request for the patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141012.
This is required by other items in ironic namely:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/135228/6/specs/kilo/uefi-secure-boot.rst.
Regards
Nisha
__
OpenStack
I reckon the blueprint [1] supersedes the one in the old wiki page you
found.
It lies in abandoned status as it did not make the release plan for Kilo. I
am sure the author and the other contributors working on it will resume it
for the next release.
Salvatore
[1]
started congress sprint hangout
https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/gwspatjycr3rore6smdkganufua
and / or join on the #congress channel
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:59 PM, sean roberts seanrobert...@gmail.com
wrote:
Join the Congress team to push your code over the milestone line. The
Congress team
Excerpts from Angus Lees's message of 2015-02-04 16:59:31 -0800:
On Thu Feb 05 2015 at 9:02:49 AM Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 5 February 2015 at 10:24, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
How interesting,
Why are people using galera if it behaves like
On 02/05/2015 10:32 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:28:56AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
For what it's worth, I was able to make hugepages work with an older qemu by
commenting out two lines in
virt.libvirt.config.LibvirtConfigGuestMemoryBacking.format_dom()
def
Excerpts from Avishay Traeger's message of 2015-02-04 22:19:53 -0800:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 5 February 2015 at 10:24, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
How interesting,
Why are people using galera if it behaves
+1 to all the nominations. Many thanks to the departing cores for their
contributions and bringing Trove to where it is today.
On Feb 5, 2015, at 9:02 AM, Craig Vyvial cp16...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 +1 +1
I think these nominations will help grow the trove community.
-Craig
On Thu, Feb
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Malawade, Abhijeet
abhijeet.malaw...@nttdata.com wrote:
Hi,
I have submitted patch for cinder-client [1] to 'Return tuple containing
header and body from client' instead of just response.
Also cinder spec for the same is under review [2].
This change
I'd like to step back for a moment as to the purpose of different kinds of
documentation. Sphinx is great and it provides some forms of documentation.
But, why do we document methods, classes, or functions in python? Should we
drop that and rely on Sphinx? I don't think anyone would argue for
Hello all,
Regarding https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/router-properties-object
Does anyone know if there are plans to implement this functionality in an
upcoming release? Our use case meets the one described by Kevin, but rather
than trying to route traffic to an outside resource,
Hey folks,
I wanted to provide a brief update on where we are headed with Kolla.
Initially Kolla began as a POC to show that containers could be used to deploy
OpenStack with the long term plan of integrating that functionality into
TripleO. That goal has not changed.
The tripleo community
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:21:05AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 02/05/2015 10:32 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:28:56AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
For what it's worth, I was able to make hugepages work with an older qemu by
commenting out two lines in
On 02/05/2015 11:23 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:21:05AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 02/05/2015 10:32 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:28:56AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
For what it's worth, I was able to make hugepages work with an
On 2/5/2015 4:49 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:40:46AM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On 02/05/2015 11:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
This is a message to alert everyone to the fact that the old hypervisor
support matrix on the wiki[1], should really be considered
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi Team Nova,
This is a message to alert everyone to the fact that the old hypervisor
support matrix on the wiki[1], should really be considered obsolete.
The canonical location for it going forward will be
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
On 2/5/2015 4:49 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:40:46AM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On 02/05/2015 11:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
This is a message to alert everyone to the
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:28:56AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 02/04/2015 06:48 PM, Steve Gordon wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com
Setting that aside, there's another topic. I haven't actually specified
NUMA bindings, only huge pages, so
Unable to establish connection to
http://10.107.0.139:9696/v2.0/networks.json
10.107.0.139 is IP of Horizon
It's probably also the IP of other services. 9696 is neutron's port number.
Check that you have neutron running. If it is running, then your keystone
endpoint for neutron is probably
On 2015-02-05 09:20:35 -0800 (-0800), Matthew Farina wrote:
[...]
But, why do we document methods, classes, or functions in python?
Should we drop that and rely on Sphinx? I don't think anyone would
argue for that.
[...]
Particularly since Sphinx collects the method/class/function
docstrings
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
