On 06/04/2015 05:27 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
Hi Ruby,
Thanks for starting this thread, just like you I've been always
confused about when and when not bump the microversioning of the API.
Backwards compatible API adds with no user signaling is a fallacy
because it assumes the arrow of
Thanks Miguel!
From: Miguel Angel Ajo [mailto:mangel...@redhat.com]
Sent: 05 June 2015 14:12
To: Vikram Choudhary
Cc: azama-y...@mxe.nes.nec.co.jp; Henry Fourie; Cathy Zhang; arma...@gmail.com;
Dongfeng (C); Kyle Mestery; openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; Dhruv Dhody;
Kalyankumar Asangi
Thanks Eric, I see. Yes, this can make sure the user would not need to
contact the server using bay-show/baymode-show to get UUID of bay/baymodel,
but Magnum need to be updated to make the bay/baymodel uuid generate logic.
2015-06-05 13:42 GMT+08:00 Eric Windisch e...@windisch.us:
I think
On 04/06/15 19:23 -0400, Zane Bitter wrote:
Ever since we established[1] a format for including metadata about
bugs in Git commit messages that included a 'Partial-Bug' tag, people
have been looking for a way to do the equivalent for partial blueprint
implementations. A non-exhaustive search
Following this link I configured it in my infrastructure. Maybe this can
also help you.
https://www.softwareab.net/wordpress/openstack-adding-external-networks-neutron-gre/
Miguel.
El 04/06/15 23:15, Geo Varghese escribió:
Thanks a lot friend for explaining it. I am also using ubuntu.
let
On 04/06/15 11:46 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 06/04/2015 03:01 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 03/06/15 16:46 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
We recently ran into an issue where nova couldn't write an image file due to
lack of space and so just quit reading from glance.
This caused glance to be
Dear Openstack community
I have a strange intermittent problem with cinder when VMs with volumes
attached are terminated. Sometimes the process doesn't work and the VMs are
stuck into and undeletable state.
Some info about my setup:
*
* Openstack Juno from ubuntu-cloud repo
*
On 06/04/2015 06:18 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
On Jun 4, 2015 5:53 AM, Dmitry Tantsur dtant...@redhat.com
mailto:dtant...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
While working on the enroll spec [1], I got a thinking: within the
new state machine, when should we allow to change a node driver?
Armando, yes I will be using the latest version for heading up the work.
From: Armando M. [mailto:arma...@gmail.com]
Sent: 05 June 2015 08:57
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Kalyankumar Asangi; Ramanjaneya palleti
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Service
Hi,
I still think we need to look at lot more carefully at why using an
isolated service tenant would not work.
Sure, thats a bit rich coming from someone trying to limit the scope
of Nova, but really I am just trying to work out what the problem is
you are tying to solve, and specifically what
Kevin,
Thanks for the reply.
Have added these names of external network in any other configurations
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov wrote:
Those are the 4 external networks. In this cloud, they are all linux
bridges.
I'm not using vlan tagging on this
Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona wrote:
Given that tags have a clear binary value, and that some people have
expressed the convenience of having some more information available,
maybe the tags could be just the result of applying certain conditions
to a more complex description of a metric or set of
Hello, Girija!
Read some information about Ceilometer here: [1].
In short, it works in two ways:
1. Collecting information with the help of several pollsters doing
Openstack API calls.
2. Listening Openstack notification bus for incoming messages.
In both ways you need something that will gather
Added openstack-dev, where I believe this conversation must live.
I totally agree on this, thank you for bringing up this conversation. This is
not something we want to do for QoS this cycle, but probably next cycle.
Anyway, an unified data model and API to create/update classifiers will not
Dear All,
There are multiple proposal floating around flow classifier rules for Liberty
[1], [2] and [3].
I feel we all should work together and try to address all our use case having a
unified framework rather than working separately achieving the same goal.
Moreover, I can find the
Kevin,
Thanks for the reply.
Have added these names of external network in any other configurations
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov wrote:
Those are the 4 external networks. In this cloud, they are all linux
bridges.
I'm not using vlan tagging on this
Miguel,
Thanks thats a great link. Let me try it.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Miguel A Diaz Corchero
miguelangel.d...@externos.ciemat.es wrote:
Following this link I configured it in my infrastructure. Maybe this can
also help you.
Hi,
So in the interests of filling up your inbox yet further...
We have lots of etherpads from the summit:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Design_Summit/Liberty/Etherpads#Nova
I have extracted all the action items here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-nova-liberty-summit-action-items
On 4 June 2015 at 12:54, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
Hi,
We have a regular Nova project meeting with alternating times, as
described here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova
I will lean towards no change of the times, given we are used to them.
But I want to double
Hi Gabriel,
Thank you very much for your help, it was exactly the same problem that you had.
I set the host variable on my rbd backend in the cinder config file and
restarted the cinder-volume processes on my controllers.
Then I manually updated the database “cinder” to reflect the new cinder
One of the things we realized at the summit was that we'd been working
through a better future for the Nova API for the past 5 cycles, gotten
somewhere quite useful, but had really done a poor job on communicating
what was going on and why, and where things are headed next.
I've written a bunch
Another use case is for security/firewall classifiers.
I agree with this and i think me and Miguel talked about it in the summit,
but in order for this to go
forward someone need to start creating a spec and managing this effort.
Since you proposed it first Vikram, will you do it?
If not i will
Hi,
I have a user with admin role in default domain.
I want to create a project scoped token using this, but getting a 401 error.
Following is the exact setup
Keystone: Juno version using identity v3 APIs
Domain: default
User: admin (has admin role assigned to default domain)
Project: testscope
So.. summarizing the various options again:
Plan A
Just drop stable point releases.
(-) No more release notes
(-) Lack of reference points to compare installations
Plan B
Push date-based tags across supported projects from time to time.
(-) Encourages to continue using same version across the
Nice pointer Boris ! :)
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/04/2015 07:46 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
Jay,
At this time, Neutron is the only project that has done any
splitting out of driver and advanced services repos. Other projects
have
On 06/04/2015 11:36 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 12:55:19PM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
On 06/05/2015 12:02 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
Don't plan on doing much else
Ever? or just for sometime while I get it going?
The thing is that it's only ever one commit way from not-going.
Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-06-01 15:57:17 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
[...]
The biggest hurdle is that we'd need a separate upload job name
for those since the current version of Zuul lacks a way to run a
particular job for different branches in different pipelines (we'd
want to
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 02:46:07PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
So.. summarizing the various options again:
Plan A
Just drop stable point releases.
(-) No more release notes
(-) Lack of reference points to compare installations
Plan B
Push date-based tags across supported projects from
On 2015-06-05 14:56:30 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
I was wondering if we could switch to post-versioning on stable
branches, and basically generate:
2015.1.0.post38
[...]
I think the recommendation from the PyPI maintainers is to not use
.postN suffixes since they are intended
Hi Miguel,
*I am adding my content of /etc/neutron/plugins/ml2/ml2_conf.ini of
controller*
[ml2]
type_drivers = gre,vlan
tenant_network_types = gre,vlan
mechanism_drivers = openvswitch
[ml2_type_flat]
flat_networks =
[ml2_type_vlan]
network_vlan_ranges = physnet1:803:803,physnet2:805:805
On 06/04/2015 11:13 PM, Jamie Lennox wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Thursday, 4 June, 2015 2:25:52 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Domain and Project naming
With
Hi all,
I wanted to point out the updated specification for the approach we're
taking for the API docs, basically scraping the code with a WSGI layer to
build Swagger files. See
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177934/5/specs/liberty/api-site.rst for
the gory details. A huge thanks to Tom Fifield
Hello!
Please, look at the change:
https://review.openstack.org/188383
On 03.06.2015 18:56, James E. Blair wrote:
Evgeny Antyshev eantys...@odin.com writes:
Some CIs like to narrow their scope to a certain set of files.
For that, they specify file mask on per-job basis. So there appear
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
One option is to abandon the idea and converge to using the same
concept. Another option is to rename that rich data (project
operational metadata ?) to avoid the confusion of calling with same
name what is
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-05-29 17:38:04 -0400:
This message is a summary of the notes from the “Release Versioning Servers”
discussion held during the release management/QA/infrastructure meetup period
on Friday morning at the summit, along with some commentary I thought
Good summary, Ed!
Ed Leafe said on Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 07:53:02AM -0500:
I totally agree the scheduler doesn't have to know anything about
flavors though. We should push them out to request validation in the
Nova API. This can be considered part of cleaning up the scheduler API.
This
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Sean Dague wrote:
Thanks for your time,
Thanks for writing that up.
I recognize that microversions exist and are as they are so I don't
want to derail, but my curiosity was piqued:
Riddle me this: If Microversions are kind of like content-negotiation
(and we love
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 02:46:07PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Plan A
Just drop stable point releases.
(-) No more release notes
(-) Lack of reference points to compare installations
Plan B
Push date-based tags across supported projects from time to time.
(-)
Hi,
I would like to raise your attention for the bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1461777
since it can impact the efficiency of your cloud.
It affects Juno and Kilo deployments.
Belmiro
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
On 06/05/2015 07:46 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
So.. summarizing the various options again:
Plan A
Just drop stable point releases.
(-) No more release notes
(-) Lack of reference points to compare installations
Plan B
Push date-based tags across supported projects from time to time.
(-)
If the downsteam consumer has their own extra patches ontop of the
stable branch, then it seems D is even less useful than A.
It is not - downstream (speaking for RDO) I would keep Version:
2015.1.N where N is stable patch# so that we have a common reference
point with other distros.
Our
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:17 PM, John Wood john.w...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hello folks,
Regarding option C, if group IDs are unique within a given
cloud/context, and these are discoverable by clients that can then set the
ACL on a secret in Barbican, then that seems like a viable option to
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:54 AM, David Chadwick d.w.chadw...@kent.ac.uk
wrote:
I did suggest another solution to Adam whilst we were in Vancouver, and
this mirrors what happens in the real world today when I order something
from a supplier and a whole supply chain is involved in creating the
Hi Romain,
I think you may be experiencing this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1447884
with a fix currently up:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/177084/
Best,
-jay
On 06/05/2015 04:02 AM, Aviolat Romain wrote:
Dear Openstack community
I have a strange intermittent problem with
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:49 AM, David Stanek dsta...@dstanek.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:04 AM liusheng liusheng1...@126.com wrote:
Thanks for this topic, also, I think it is similar situation when
talking about keystone users, not only the instances's password.
In the past we've
Hi Dan,
I just want to update you that the report success after short
less-than-a-minute run is Zuul problem see [1].
This is happened because we apply filter rules to run only on PCI code to
reduce load on our CI System.
Unfortunately we missed this issue in our monitoring because all the
On 06/05/2015 05:46 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
So.. summarizing the various options again:
Plan A
Just drop stable point releases.
(-) No more release notes
(-) Lack of reference points to compare installations
Plan B
Push date-based tags across supported projects from time to time.
(-)
On 06/03/2015 01:43 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 06/03/2015 10:10 AM, Adam Young wrote:
I gave a presentation on Dynamic Policy for Access Control at the Summit.
https://www.openstack.org/summit/vancouver-2015/summit-videos/presentation/dynamic-policy-for-access-control
My slides are here:
You would just store the url in the DTO.
You will need to have the KMIP secret store return the KMIP server
that handled the request in the metadata that is returned to Barbican
Core.
each kmip server url would need to be in the barbican-api.conf file?
I would assume that would be true.
I'm
Hi Vikram,
Definitely. We should have one unified and generic flow classifier/filter
(whatever name we call it) that can be used by all cases. Thank you for driving
this!
Thanks,
Cathy
From: Miguel Angel Ajo [mailto:mangel...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 1:42 AM
To: Vikram
Sure. I will add this item to the next IRC meeting agenda.
Thanks,
Cathy
From: Henry Fourie
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 11:27 AM
To: Miguel Angel Ajo; Vikram Choudhary
Cc: azama-y...@mxe.nes.nec.co.jp; Cathy Zhang; arma...@gmail.com; Dongfeng (C);
Kyle Mestery;
But if there is one package out of all of the OS options, does that make true
or false ? Or do we have a rule that says a 1 means that at least CentOS and
Ubuntu are packaged ?
I remain to be convinced that a 0 or 1 can be achieved within the constraints
that we need something which is useful
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-06-05 05:46:07 -0700:
So.. summarizing the various options again:
Thanks for the excellent summary Thierry
Plan C
Let projects randomly tag point releases whenever
(-) Still a bit costly in terms of herding cats
I feel like plan C is the
Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2015-06-05 20:03:44 +0300:
Hi stackers,
Seems likes after stackforge/rally - openstack/rally Rally project started
being more attractive.
According recent stats we are on top 3 position (based on Patch sets stats)
Sylvain,
Are you sure your tone is appropriate once you read again your email ?
I don't see anything wrong in tone email at all.
I just summarize for Rally team results of that thread. So they won't need
to read it.
And explain why we won't have sub cores and need trust model.
That's all.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona j...@bitergia.com
wrote:
[Disclamer: I'm not an OpenStack operator, neither an OpenStack
developer. I only have some experience in metrics, quality models, and
tags]
Given that tags have a clear binary value, and that some people
On 2015-06-05 18:34:02 + (+), Tim Bell wrote:
But if there is one package out of all of the OS options, does
that make true or false ? Or do we have a rule that says a 1 means
that at least CentOS and Ubuntu are packaged ?
I remain to be convinced that a 0 or 1 can be achieved within
Doug,
I understand that you feel that the negative response to your
proposal was strong, but this is *COMPLETELY* inappropriate wording
for this mailing list.
Okay, next time I will copy paste parts of emails from others
(with the even more offensive tone in my side)
Instead of making such
With my op hat on, I'd very much prefer packaged-in-ubuntu/packaged-in-centos
or packaged=ubuntu,centos. If its just packaged=True, I'd still have to go look
up if its in my distro of choice.
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Jeremy Stanley [fu...@yuggoth.org]
Sent:
Hey all.
I wanted to get people's opinion on allowing barbican to talk to multiple
KMIP servers.
I got good advice from Nathan and John and it seems like it would be pretty
easy keeping track of
which secret resides in which KMIP applicance. You would just store the url
in the DTO.
However, in
+1
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:52 AM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
On 12 May 2015 at 20:33, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 05/12/2015 01:12 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-05-12 10:04:11 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
It's a nice up side. However, as others have
The one proviso is that in single LDAP situations, the cloud provider can chose
(for backward compatibility reasons) to allow the underlying LDAP user/group
ID….so we might want to advise this to be disabled (there’s a config switch to
use the Public ID mapping for even this case).
Henry
On 5
If such possibility appears then definitely will be people that will try it
without weighing in to this discussion (like me).
And, the only social problem is that such maintainers of
project-sub-parts should be responsible enough. It is very likely that some
vendor-specific-things maintainers can
Le 05/06/2015 19:03, Boris Pavlovic a écrit :
Hi stackers,
Seems likes after stackforge/rally - openstack/rally Rally project
started being more attractive.
According recent stats we are on top 3 position (based on Patch sets
stats)
Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2015-06-05 21:16:04 +0300:
All,
Sorry for picking very bad words. I am not native speaker. =(
In Russia this word has as well another meaning like being to aggressive
against somebody. I used it in that meaning. I didn't thought about
sexually
Hi,
Maybe we should just give a try:
1) I will prepare all modifications out of infra and show demo
2) Get it in Infra as experimental feature
3) Try it in Rally
4) Share experience and if it is worth keep it or get rid of it.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 9:21 PM,
On 2015-06-05 15:12:42 + (+), Znoinski, Waldemar wrote:
[...]
I'd like to know more about what you saw and/or what was causing
(or you think was) the problem.
Specifically, we saw all available Gerrit stream-events worker
threads busy servicing your connections, and all other
Colleen Murphy wrote:
3) Manually abandon after N months/weeks changes that have a -1 that was
never responded to
```
If a change is submitted and given a -1, and subsequently the author
becomes unresponsive for a few weeks, reviewers should leave reminder
comments on the review or attempt to
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 02:46:07PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
So.. summarizing the various options again:
Plan A
Just drop stable point releases.
(-) No more release notes
(-) Lack of reference points to compare installations
Plan B
Push date-based tags across
Markus Zoeller wrote:
Joe Gordonjoe.gord...@gmail.com wrote on 05/16/2015 03:33:35 AM:
After further investigation in blockdiag, is useless for moderately
complex diagrams.
Here is my attempt at graphing nova [0], but due to a blockdiag bug
from 2013, [1] it is impossible to clearly read. For
Hi,
+1 for #1 and if patch is not touched for N weeks just finish it using
current active team.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Richard Raseley rich...@raseley.com wrote:
Colleen Murphy wrote:
3) Manually abandon after N months/weeks changes that have a -1 that
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Henry Nash henry.n...@uk.ibm.com wrote:
So I think that GroupID's are actually unique and safesince in the
multi LDAP case we provide an indirection already in Keystone and issue a
Public ID (this is true for bother users and groups), that we map to the
I am sure I have missed something along the way, but can someone explain to me
why we need this at all. Project names are unique within a domain, with the
exception of the project that is acting as its domain (i.e. they can only every
be two names clashing in a hierarchy at the domain level
On Wednesday 3 June 2015 at 12:13, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote:
Doesn’t this overlap with the work done for the OSProfiler ?
More comments inline.
Miguel Ángel Ajo
On Wednesday, 3 de June de 2015 at 11:43, Kekane, Abhishek wrote:
Hi Devs,
So for I have got following
So I think that GroupID's are actually unique and safesince in the multi
LDAP case we provide an indirection already in Keystone and issue a Public ID
(this is true for BOTH users and groups), that we map to the underlying local
ID in the particular LDAP backend.
Henry
On 5 Jun 2015, at
We have a bunch of client libraries with out-dated requirements to
varying degrees [1], and some of them are causing dependency conflicts
in gate jobs. It would be good if project teams could prioritize
those reviews so we can release updates early next week.
Thanks,
Doug
[1]
Hi PTLs and release liaisons,
Due to being on a plane without wifi, I'll be missing my 0800-1000 UTC
release management office hours on Tuesday, June 9.
We'll still have office hours between 1800 and 2000 UTC on that day, in
case you have anything to discuss or questions to ask.
If you can't
Chris Friesen said on Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 10:57:54PM -0600:
On 06/04/2015 05:23 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
I have personally been using:
Implements: partial-blueprint x
but I don't actually care much. I would also be fine with:
Partially-Implements: blueprint x
If we need one,
On 06/03/2015 05:05 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
Hi David,
There needs to be some form of global hierarchy delimiter - well more
to the point there should be a common one across OpenStack
installations to ensure we are providing a good and consistent (and
more to the point inter-operable)
Hi Jamie
I think if we are going for hierarchical names we should do it properly
in one go ie. have a recursive scheme that allows infinite nesting of
name components, and then it will solve all current and future problems.
Having a half baked scheme which only allows one level of nesting, or
Thai -
I thought there was a conscious decision to separate addressing the JSCS
issues and applying JP's guidelines.Smaller more precise patches are
easier to land!
I plan on applying JP's guidelines in a follow on patch.Especially
since one of my JSCS patches merged this morning.
Hi stackers,
Seems likes after stackforge/rally - openstack/rally Rally project started
being more attractive.
According recent stats we are on top 3 position (based on Patch sets stats)
http://stackalytics.com/?release=libertymetric=patchesproject_type=All
And if we compare half year ago we have
Hi Miguel,
Thanks for getting back to me.
I have already restarted both machines - controller and compute
Do i need to paste any commands or conf to debug it?
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Miguel A Diaz Corchero
miguelangel.d...@externos.ciemat.es wrote:
El 05/06/15 13:07, Geo Varghese
Hi Anita,
Thanks for taking an action there. I wasn't expecting my work to affect infra
that much. Apologize for that.
Please see my comments inline below.
-Original Message-
From: Anita Kuno [mailto:ante...@anteaya.info]
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 8:15 PM
To: Znoinski, Waldemar
I seem yo remember there being a mapping driver of some kind in juno+ that when
enabled doesnt just use the ldap unique identifier raw. Its optional though. I
also dont know if it doublechecks for uniqueness or just hashes.
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Dolph Mathews
Kevin,
You are right. Just found the issue. Created external network as Flat
network.
Now its is working :)
Thanks a lot guys for your valuable help
Kevin
Miguel
Noah
I will keep in touch wth you guys.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov wrote:
Since you
Containers and OpenStack: here's what you need to know
http://superuser.openstack.org/articles/containers-and-openstack-here-s-what-you-need-to-know
Interview with Adrian Otto, a principal architect at Rackspace, is the
project technical lead (PTL) for Magnum, an API service
Hello everyone,
Unfortunately the recent patch for SWIFT issue [1] broke our staging
tests last night. The problem is now resolved, new staging tests passed
successfully. We need ~12 hours more to run the newly built ISO through
SWARM tests, so we will have the results tomorrow morning MSK.
Right now, there are several JS linters in use in OpenStack: JSHint, JSCS,
and Eslint. I really would like to only use one of them, so that I can
figure out how to sanely share the configuration between projects.
Can all those who have a strong opinion please stand up and state their
opinions?
We have been having this issue with devstack installation since Tuesday 6/2.
On trying to add IPv6 address to br-ex, it fails with permission denied.
Here's the output from stack.sh:
+ IPV6_ROUTER_GW_IP=2001:db8::1
+ die_if_not_set 1299 IPV6_ROUTER_GW_IP 'Failure retrieving IPV6_ROUTER_GW_IP'
+
Hi All ,
I am currently working on use cases for database and file Encryption.It is
really important for us to know since my Encryption use case would be using
the key generated by Barbican through order resource as the key.
The encyption algorithms would not accept the binary format and even if
+1
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Vilobh Meshram
vilobhmeshram.openst...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:52 AM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com
wrote:
On 12 May 2015 at 20:33, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 05/12/2015 01:12 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-05-12
Hi Michael,
Disclaimer: I work for RiverMeadow. I also have vast cloud and openstack
expertise.
If you are an enterprise, and would like to move your work loads into
Glance, I suggest looking at an offering like that of RiverMeadows. The
platform allows you to seamlessly migrate servers from
Hi Geo,
When configuring multiple provider bridges, try to think of a 1:1 relationship
between a provider bridge and a physical interface on the host that connects to
a particular switching layer (in many cases). For example:
br-eth0 is a bridge containing eth0. Eth0 connects to a switching
Cathy,
Make sure to take note when Fall rolls around that pacific time is
ambiguous. UTC does not observe daylight savings so a meeting at 1700UTC
will be 10:00 PDT but 09:00 PST.
On 6/4/2015 5:17 PM, Cathy Zhang wrote:
Thanks for joining the service chaining meeting today! Sorry for the
Hi Wilson,
Can you clarify a couple of things here?
- Does each tenant have their own router in front of their respective instance?
- have you confirmed connectivity to the admin instance from the router
namespace?
- can you verify the dnat/snat entries for the admin instance exist in
Continuing with David's example and the need to control access to a Swift
object that Adam points out,
How about using the Glance token from glance-API service to glance-registry but
carry along extra data in the call, namely user-id, domain, and public/private
information, so the object can
Since you are passing the tagged physical network device eth1.803 into the
bridge, I think you need to use a flat network in the config/ external network
create command. Otherwise it may do nested vlan tags.
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Geo Varghese
Sent: Friday, June
Hi All,
The Tricircle Project has been on stackforge for a while, and without much
activities.
Now we will completely restructure the code base to make it more community
open source friendly, less corporate PoC looking hopefully :P
At the mean time I want to call for attention for people who
On 06/05/2015 09:34 AM, Alan Pevec wrote:
If the downsteam consumer has their own extra patches ontop of the
stable branch, then it seems D is even less useful than A.
It is not - downstream (speaking for RDO) I would keep Version:
2015.1.N where N is stable patch# so that we have a common
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
