Hi Mark,
Sorry, I should have framed my question better.
What I'm trying to look for here is a way in which I can make requests for
multiple instances at a given instant of time. basically what I'm trying to
find here is if the nova-api gets multiple requests with the same time how
does it handle
On 7/14/15, 13:47, "Monty Taylor" wrote:
>Hi everybody!
>
>Ok. There is nothing more actually useful I can say that isn't in the
>subject line. As I mentioned previously, the preliminary results from
>our name election are here:
>
>http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_4983776e190c8d
Good news. After finalizing the trademark checks and giving the community time
to weigh in, Mitaka will be the name of the M release.
Thanks again for the great discussion around this topic, and for the
willingness to be responsive to the concerns of fellow community members.
> On Jul 9, 2015
Hi everybody!
Ok. There is nothing more actually useful I can say that isn't in the
subject line. As I mentioned previously, the preliminary results from
our name election are here:
http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_4983776e190c8dbc
As you are all probably aware by now, as a fol
Hi Heiko,
This command contains worker counts already. No need to start workers
manually by using ssbench-worker.
ssbench-master run-scenario -f large.scenario -u 200 -o 4000 --workers 4
- Ensure there’s no any workers “$ps aux | grep ssbench”
- Try to kill workers “$ssbench-master kill-w
Hi Venkat,
I'm using Helium SR2 as it is suggested in the wiki.
So you suggest to use Lithium or it is a negligible problem?
Thanks.
Silvia
2015-07-13 21:04 GMT+02:00 Venkatrangan G - ERS, HCL Tech <
venkatrang...@hcl.com>:
> Hi Silvia,
>
>
>
> It is enough to just stack again. To provide more
I would like to federate keystone with an IdP that has SSO to let those
user access Swift without duplicating any information on the keystone
database (I would install OpenStack with just keystone and Swift).
I have two questions about this.
1) Is there any good resource explaining how to configu
I don't understand the CloudStack case for data disks; but in OpenStack you
should look at ephemeral storage - see the flavour definition at
http://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ops/content/flavors.html
This will allow you to have a main disk and a data disk visible to the VM;
however it is not
Well, we are migrating from cloudstack now and it has this feature
So, do I understand It right. In current situation I cannot use data disk's at
local storages at all?
The only solution is to make additional layer through cinder+lvm and share
cinder vols through iscsi?
Do you know what's the b
I'm wondering about the same...
On 14 July 2015 at 06:42, Peter Kardoš wrote:
> Hi,
>It is possible to setup in FWaaS DNAT rule?
>
> Thanks.
> Peter
>
> ___
> Mailing list:
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
> Post to
Hi Ivan,
In that case then no, I don't believe what you are trying to achieve is
currently possible with OpenStack. My understanding is that detachable block
storage is provided only by Cinder and Cinder must be network-attached storage
as there is no concept of tying the storage to particular
Ok, well...
I don't have the reason to use precisely Cinder.
What I need is the ability to create, delete and attach data volumes to
instances. As far as I know I can't do it without Cinder.
If you can show me a path how to do it, and use local storages only - that
would be really great
Regards,
Hey Jamie,
Yes - Last I checked, this should work just fine.
Thanks,
Kiall
On 14/07/15 12:12, Jaime Fernández wrote:
> We search for a DNS solution in our Icehouse Openstack platform. Moving
> to a new version of Openstack is not possible now due to the cost of
> migration.
>
> Is it possible t
So, do I understand it right - I can't get rid of additional layer for cinder
volumes, if I want to use local storage?
Regards,
IT engineer
Farheap, Russia
Ivan Derbenev
From: Bob Ball [mailto:bob.b...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 12:34 PM
To: Ivan Derbenev; openstack@lists.openstack
As I understand it Cinder provides volumes that must be accessible to VMs on
any of the hosts - i.e. must be accessed over the network. Therefore if you
want to use Cinder to provide data volumes (or BFV) then you need a VM/physical
machine/storage array providing the actual storage which is ac
We search for a DNS solution in our Icehouse Openstack platform. Moving to
a new version of Openstack is not possible now due to the cost of migration.
Is it possible to use latest version (master) of Designate with Icehouse
openstack?
We've played a bit with Designate and it would satisfy our re
Do you have your nova deployment divided up in a way that means Neutron
might be trying to send events to a Nova API server that doesn't know about
that instance?
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Chris wrote:
> Hello Matt,
>
> The errors are shown in the neutron server log on our management node
Hi,
It is possible to setup in FWaaS DNAT rule?
Thanks.
Peter
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
Hi:All I noticed that there are many error logs in my openvswitch-agent.log
of network node. for
example:=2015-07-14
03:28:45.256 5934 ERROR root [-] Unexpected exception occurred 61 time(s
Hi Ivan,
XenAPINFSDriver was primarily useful for pooled scenarios (which in turn relied
on Nova aggregates) - however it's not the easiest way to consume Cinder
volumes. The XenServer Nova integration supports BFV and volume attach for
Cinder volumes presented over iSCSI, so however those are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys,
first of all, sorry for this cross post but it seems very critical:
https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/78403/swift-broken-pipe/
I'm running in a very strange issue if i'm using ssbench to test my cluster.
* Swift 2.2.2
* 2 Proxy Nod
21 matches
Mail list logo
