Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party][openstack][CI] Examples required for "single_node_ci_data.yaml" config file

Hi Ramy, The image build seems to be working fine now but while running the command "*nodepool image-upload all 'dpc'*" its is failing with the following error: 2016-05-11 10:58:43,233 INFO gear.Connection.nodepool: Disconnected from 127.0.0.1 port 4730 2016-05-11 10:58:43,234 INFO

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Seeing db lockout issues in neutron add_router_interface

In addition to what Mike said, "Lock wait timeout exceeded" sounds like an error from the C-based mysql driver that eventlet couldn't recognize yielding calls on. We have moved away from that upstream for quite some time now. Ensure your DB connection string starts with 'mysql+pymysql://' to use

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party][openstack][CI] Examples required for "single_node_ci_data.yaml" config file

Hi Ramy, The image build seems to be working fine now but while running the command "*nodepool image-upload all 'dpc'*" its is failing with the following error: 2016-05-11 10:58:43,233 INFO gear.Connection.nodepool: Disconnected from 127.0.0.1 port 4730 2016-05-11 10:58:43,234 INFO

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] LBaaSv2 / Octavia support

Sorry to dig up an ancient thread. I see the spec has been implemented, and in the os_neutron repo I see configs for the Haproxy driver for LOADBALANCERV2 - but not Octavia. Am I missing something here? On 29 January 2016 at 10:03, Major Hayden wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

[Openstack] Error: No valid host was found. There are not enough hosts available

Hello, I am trying to integrate the Ironic service with other openstack services. I am using liberty release of openstack. installed and configured the Ironic service. here is the setup: 1: all openstack services are deployed on VM 2: controller is on one VM (along with other services) and

[openstack-dev] [infra] Jobs failing : "No matching distribution found for "

So it seems the just released pip 8.1.2 has brought in a new version of setuptools with it, which creates canonical names per [1] by replacing "." with "-". The upshot is that pip is now looking for the wrong name on our local mirrors. e.g. --- $ pip --version pip 8.1.2 from

[OpenStack-Infra] [infra] Jobs failing : "No matching distribution found for "

So it seems the just released pip 8.1.2 has brought in a new version of setuptools with it, which creates canonical names per [1] by replacing "." with "-". The upshot is that pip is now looking for the wrong name on our local mirrors. e.g. --- $ pip --version pip 8.1.2 from

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][doc]An error in OpenStack architecture picture

On 11/05/16 12:58, hao wang wrote: > Hi, stackers, > > I found an error in OpenStack architecture picture in docs: > http://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ops/content/architecture.html. > > In OpenStack Logical Architecture picture, Cinder's database is named "nova > database", it's not correct.

[openstack-dev] [nova] Gap between host cpu features and guest cpu's

Hi everyone, Currently nova exposes all the host CPU instruction set extensions available on the compute node in the host state, and there is a scheduler filter `ComputeCapabilitiesFilter` which looks at these. But the limits on this is: CPU instruction set in ComputeCapabilitiesFilter should be

[openstack-dev] [cinder][doc]An error in OpenStack architecture picture

Hi, stackers, I found an error in OpenStack architecture picture in docs: http://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ops/content/architecture.html. In OpenStack Logical Architecture picture, Cinder's database is named "nova database", it's not correct. It should be "cinder database".

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Smaug] Meeting time change

Got it -- Original -- From: "??";; Date: Tue, May 10, 2016 10:45 PM To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org"; Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Smaug] Meeting time change About the Smaug meeting

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] An idea to help browse and troubleshoot Ansible Playbook runs

This is really neat, nice work David! I can see this being useful for zuulv3 or even just infra runs as more of our tooling moves to ansible :-) On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:24 AM, David Moreau Simard wrote: > Hi openstack-infra, > > I've been hacking on an idea since last

[OpenStack-Infra] An idea to help browse and troubleshoot Ansible Playbook runs

Hi openstack-infra, I've been hacking on an idea since last friday and I was thinking it could be of interest for you guys as Ansible users, but also considering the next generation of Zuul jobs will be powered by Ansible. The project I'm working on is called ARA [1]. It is very much an alpha at

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [senlin] [keystone] [ceilometer] [telemetry] Questions about api-ref launchpad bugs

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 07:53:19AM -0500, Anne Gentle wrote: > Great questions, so I'm copying the -docs and -dev lists to make sure > people know the answers. > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Atsushi SAKAI > wrote: > > > Hello Anne > > > > I have several question

Re: [Openstack] [Discuss]After create 'stack' user by create-stack-user.sh, how to login by stack ?

I don't if it's bug. After switch to stack, I found I'm located in /opt/stack, and all operation like create folder is not permited. stack@gateway-20150605:~$ ls data devstack.subunit logs requirements stack@gateway-20150605:~$ pwd /opt/stack stack@gateway-20150605:~$ ls data

Re: [Openstack] [Discuss]After create 'stack' user by create-stack-user.sh, how to login by stack ?

Thank you ! That works ! 2016-05-10 19:25 GMT+08:00 Nikolay Starodubtsev : > Hi, > Try to use 'sudo login -f stack'. This may help :) > > > > Nikolay Starodubtsev > > Software Engineer > > Mirantis Inc. > > > Skype: dark_harlequine1 > > 2016-05-10 13:23 GMT+03:00

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] gate testing with lvm imagebackend

On 5/10/2016 5:47 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 5/10/2016 5:14 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: On 05/10/2016 03:51 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: For the libvirt imagebackend refactor that mdbooth is working on, I have a POC devstack-gate change which runs with the lvm imagebackend in the libvirt driver

Re: [Openstack-operators] Freeing the Ops Meetups

Hi all, At the Austin summit, we had about 35 of us in the room who agreed in general that it was a good idea to form this team. If you are interested in participating, please fill out this doodle poll (ensuring your timezone is appropriately set):

Re: [Openstack] [all][stable] OpenStack 2015.1.4 released (EOL release)

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:30:30PM +0100, Dave Walker wrote: > Hi, > > The OpenStack Stable Maintenance team is happy to announce the release > of the 2015.1.4 stable Kilo release. We have been busy reviewing and > accepting backported bugfixes to the stable/kilo branches according > to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

Thomas, fully agree. :) Rayson Ho, even with containers, distro packages are preferable. Its really difficult at the moment to ensure your containers don't have security vulnerabilities backed into them. None of the docker repo's I've seen really help you with automating this. The only trick

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 05/10/2016 04:19 PM, Rayson Ho wrote: > I mentioned in earlier replies but I may as well mention it again: a > package manager gives you no advantage in a language toolchain like Go Oh... You mean just like in Python where we have pip, Perl where we have CPAN, PHP where we have PEAR, or

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Seeing db lockout issues in neutron add_router_interface

On 05/10/2016 04:57 PM, Divya wrote: Hi, I am trying to run this rally test on stable/kilo https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/samples/tasks/scenarios/neutron/create_and_delete_routers.json with concurrency 50 and iterations 2000. This test basically cretaes routers and

Re: [openstack-dev] Wiki

On 11/05/16 09:04, Dan Smith wrote: Here it is :) https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Special:AncientPages Great, I see at least one I can nuke on the first page. Note that I don't seem to have delete powers on the wiki. That's surely a first step in letting people maintain the relevance of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 05/10/2016 08:42 AM, Tim Bell wrote: > I hope that the packaging technologies are considered as part of the TC > evaluation of a new language. While many alternative approaches are > available, a language which could not be packaged into RPM or DEB would > be an additional burden for distro

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 05/10/2016 01:43 AM, Rayson Ho wrote: > Using a package manager won't buy us anything, and like Clint raised, > the Linux distros are way too slow in picking up new Go releases. Let's check for the facts and compare: https://golang.org/doc/devel/release.html with:

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Newton midycle planning

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > It is that time again, the time to plan the Keystone midcycle! Looking at > the schedule [1] for Newton, the weeks that make the most sense look to be > (not in preferential order): > > R-14 June 27-01 > R-12

Re: [openstack-dev] Wiki

> Here it is :) > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Special:AncientPages Great, I see at least one I can nuke on the first page. Note that I don't seem to have delete powers on the wiki. That's surely a first step in letting people maintain the relevance of things on the wiki. --Dan

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L2gw

Yes, I am on it. I was waiting for a Green Light from few folks, which I got this morning. So, I will be working on releasing it sometime tomorrow. Hope that is OK with everybody. -Sukhdev On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Armando M. wrote: > > > On 9 May 2016 at 18:03, Gary

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] gate testing with lvm imagebackend

On 5/10/2016 5:14 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: On 05/10/2016 03:51 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: For the libvirt imagebackend refactor that mdbooth is working on, I have a POC devstack-gate change which runs with the lvm imagebackend in the libvirt driver [1]. The test results are mostly happy except

Re: [openstack-dev] Wiki

On 11/05/16 02:48, Dan Smith wrote: Hmm... that's unfortunate, as we were trying to get some of our less ephemeral items out of random etherpads and into the wiki (which has the value of being google indexed). Yeah, I'm kinda surprised anyone would consider a wiki-less world. I'm definitely

[Openstack] ip assignment failure !!

Hi Guys, I am using Devstack Kilo release. I configured vxlan network, and instantiated a simple VM using cirros image. The Ip address is not assigned to the VM. Starting network... udhcpc (v1.20.1) started Sending discover... Sending discover... Sending discover... Usage:

[Openstack] [all][stable] OpenStack 2015.1.4 released (EOL release)

Hi, The OpenStack Stable Maintenance team is happy to announce the release of the 2015.1.4 stable Kilo release. We have been busy reviewing and accepting backported bugfixes to the stable/kilo branches according to the criteria set at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranch This is the

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Need a volunteer for documentation liaisons

HongBin, What is the skill requirement or credential for this documentation liaison role? I am interested in doing this Anthony. On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote: > Hi team, > > We need a volunteer as liaison for documentation team. Just let me know if

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On Tue, May 10, 2016, at 11:10 AM, Hayes, Graham wrote: > On 10/05/2016 01:01, Gregory Haynes wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 9, 2016, at 03:54 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > >> On 9 May 2016, at 13:16, Gregory Haynes wrote: > >>> > >>> This is a bit of an aside but I am sure others are wondering the same

[openstack-dev] [magnum] Need a volunteer for documentation liaisons

Hi team, We need a volunteer as liaison for documentation team. Just let me know if you interest in this role. Best regards, Hongbin > -Original Message- > From: Lana Brindley [mailto:openst...@lanabrindley.com] > Sent: May-10-16 5:47 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List;

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] gate testing with lvm imagebackend

On 05/10/2016 03:51 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: For the libvirt imagebackend refactor that mdbooth is working on, I have a POC devstack-gate change which runs with the lvm imagebackend in the libvirt driver [1]. The test results are mostly happy except for anything related to migrate (including

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Seeing db lockout issues in neutron add_router_interface

Are there any general guidelines to avoid these db lock timeout issues in the third party neutron plugins?? Thanks, Divya On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Divya wrote: > Hi, >I am trying to run this rally test on stable/kilo >

[openstack-dev] [nova] gate testing with lvm imagebackend

For the libvirt imagebackend refactor that mdbooth is working on, I have a POC devstack-gate change which runs with the lvm imagebackend in the libvirt driver [1]. The test results are mostly happy except for anything related to migrate (including resize to same host) [2][3]. That's because

[openstack-dev] [PTL][docs]Update your cross-project liaison!

Hi everyone, OpenStack use cross project liaisons to ensure that projects are talking to each effectively, and the docs CPLs are especially important to the documentation team to ensure we have accurate docs. Can all PTLs please take a moment to check (and update if necessary) their CPL listed

Re: [openstack-dev] Easing contributions to central documentation

On 10/05/16 20:08, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Mon, May 09 2016, Matt Kassawara wrote: > >> So, before developer frustrations drive some or all projects to move >> their documentation in-tree which which negatively impacts the goal of >> presenting a coherent product, I suggest establishing an

Re: [openstack-dev] Wiki

On 2016-05-11 08:49:14 +1200 (+1200), Robert Collins wrote: [...] > Ubuntu SSO is **not** Launchpad. Launchpad is just another consumer of > Ubuntu SSO, and it has the 'feature' of forwarding through to Ubuntu > SSO - so we're actually seeing Ubuntu SSO spam accounts :(. [...] Thanks for the

[openstack-dev] [puppet] welcome tarballs!

Hi, It has been some weeks we worked on having tarballs for Puppet modules, and it's now in place. Look http://tarballs.openstack.org/puppet-nova/ as an example. * A tarball is created at every patch in master. * A tarball is created at every patch in our stable branches. * A tarball is created

[openstack-dev] [barbican] Issues with gate-barbican-python27

Hi, I submitted a simple CR (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/312786) and "gate-barbican-python27" is failing and I think it's caused by something else upstream. These are the issues that I see in the console log FAIL:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra] Proposal Jobs (was: Newton Summit Infra Sessions Recap)

On 2016-05-10 21:07:29 +0200 (+0200), Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 05/10/2016 09:00 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > [...] > > Another outcome of this is that Andreas Jaeger put together some > > project-config specific reviewing guidelines: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cross-project] The Future of Meetings

On 5/9/2016 11:30 PM, Mike Perez wrote: Hey all, When we first discussed the future of cross-project meetings at the Tokyo summit, we walked out with the idea of beginning to have ad-hoc meetings instead of one big meeting with all big tent projects. Now that we have some process in place [1]

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Seeing db lockout issues in neutron add_router_interface

Hi, I am trying to run this rally test on stable/kilo https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/samples/tasks/scenarios/neutron/create_and_delete_routers.json with concurrency 50 and iterations 2000. This test basically cretaes routers and subnets and then calls router-interface-add

Re: [openstack-dev] Wiki

On 11 May 2016 at 08:27, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > Anyway, to the original point, yes Launchpad is full of compromised > or perhaps freshly created accounts under the control of spammers. Ubuntu SSO is **not** Launchpad. Launchpad is just another consumer of Ubuntu SSO, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Austin summit priorities session recap

Thank you Matt. We'll think how we can help here. Best regards, Alex Levine On 5/10/16 7:40 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 5/10/2016 11:24 AM, Alexandre Levine wrote: Hi Matt, Sorry I couldn't reply earlier - was away. I'm worrying about ScaleIO ephemeral storage backend

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 11 May 2016 at 06:10, Hayes, Graham wrote: > On 10/05/2016 01:01, Gregory Haynes wrote: > The way this component works makes it quite difficult to make any major > improvement. > > MiniDNS (the component) takes data and sends a zone transfer every time > a recordset gets

Re: [openstack-dev] Wiki

On 2016-05-10 20:17:43 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote: [...] > Last I heard, wiki.ubuntu.com has been made read-only for general > users because they're having too hard a time keeping spam under > control (they obviously also use > login.launchpad.net/login.ubuntu.com). I'm trying to create

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] binary package install - plan of attack

On 11 May 2016 at 08:24, Paul Belanger wrote: > I don't have an issue with having 2 profiles. But as it stands today, we'll > only > be able to install one profile in the gate (the test profile based on Andreas > patch). > > So, we can agree what the profile look like

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] binary package install - plan of attack

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 07:47:34AM +1200, Robert Collins wrote: > On 11 May 2016 at 03:45, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > On 05/09/2016 11:11 AM, Robert Collins wrote: > >> [...] > >> Testing only dependencies should be in the test profile. > >> > >> We may want to have a source or

Re: [Openstack] Heat autoscaling: heat.engine.resource Forbidden: You are not authorized to perform the requested action.

Hi I'm testing this simple template: https://github.com/openstack/heat-templates/blob/master/hot/autoscaling.yaml But please notice that Fuel Health Test autoscale also fails.so I guess those trusts and domains might not be correctly deployed... :( Regards J. De: Pavlo

Re: [openstack-dev] Wiki

On 2016-05-10 12:59:41 -0400 (-0400), Anita Kuno wrote: > On 05/10/2016 12:48 PM, Dan Smith wrote: [...] > > I'm somewhat surprised that this is an issue, because I thought > > that the wiki requires an ubuntu login. Are spammers really > > getting ubuntu logins so they can come over and deface

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 10/05/2016 20:48, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 05/10/2016 12:10 PM, Hayes, Graham wrote: > >> The way this component works makes it quite difficult to make any major >> improvement. >> >> MiniDNS (the component) takes data and sends a zone transfer every time >> a recordset gets updated. That is a

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] binary package install - plan of attack

On 11 May 2016 at 02:09, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2016-05-09 19:47, Robert Collins wrote: >> >> On 9 May 2016 9:20 PM, "Andreas Jaeger" > > wrote: >> >>> >>> And then invoke "bindep test" and that would install both packages, >> correct? >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 5/9/16 5:21 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 10 May 2016 at 10:54, John Dickinson wrote: On 9 May 2016, at 13:16, Gregory Haynes wrote: This is a bit of an aside but I am sure others are wondering the same thing - Is there some info (specs/etherpad/ML thread/etc) that has more

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

On 10/05/2016 20:20, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 5/9/2016 6:46 PM, Sean Dague wrote: >> On 05/09/2016 06:37 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: >>> After seeing the amount of summit recaps and the scattered nature of >>> these (some on the ML, some on etherpads, some on personal blogs); I am >>> starting to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 05/10/2016 12:10 PM, Hayes, Graham wrote: The way this component works makes it quite difficult to make any major improvement. MiniDNS (the component) takes data and sends a zone transfer every time a recordset gets updated. That is a full (AXFR) zone transfer, so every record in the zone

[openstack-dev] [nova][ironic] Austin summit nova/ironic cross-project session recap

The full session etherpad is here [1]. Jim has already written the recap (thanks Jim) in his blog here [2]. The only thing I'd say was omitted was a mention of James Penick wanting to avoid giant fireballs of suck. [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-nova-ironic [2]

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][mistral] Saga of process than ack and where can we go from here...

Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2016-05-10 15:13:46 -0400: > Another data point: at this summit session we discussed delivering to > users notifications about events in the cloud: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-alternatives-to-polling > > It's pretty critical that this have

[openstack-announce] [release][stable][ironic] ironic-inspector 3.2.1 release (mitaka)

We are tickled pink to announce the release of: ironic-inspector 3.2.1: Hardware introspection for OpenStack Bare Metal This release is part of the mitaka stable release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic-inspector Please report issues through

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

On 5/9/2016 6:46 PM, Sean Dague wrote: On 05/09/2016 06:37 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: After seeing the amount of summit recaps and the scattered nature of these (some on the ML, some on etherpads, some on personal blogs); I am starting to wonder if we should again bring up the question of having

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][mistral] Saga of process than ack and where can we go from here...

Another data point: at this summit session we discussed delivering to users notifications about events in the cloud: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-alternatives-to-polling It's pretty critical that this have at-least-once delivery semantics, because in future people will be using

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [Infra] Newton Summit Infra Sessions Recap

On 05/10/2016 09:00 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > [...] > Another outcome of this is that Andreas Jaeger put together some > project-config specific reviewing guidelines: > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/project-config/plain/README.rst > In the future, that will be extended to mention

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 15:54 May 09, John Dickinson wrote: > On 9 May 2016, at 13:16, Gregory Haynes wrote: > > > > This is a bit of an aside but I am sure others are wondering the same > > thing - Is there some info (specs/etherpad/ML thread/etc) that has more > > details on the bottleneck you're running in to?

[openstack-dev] [Infra] Newton Summit Infra Sessions Recap

I'm Cc'ing this to the openstack-infra ML but setting MFT to direct subsequent discussion to the openstack-dev ML so we can hopefully avoid further cross-posting as much as possible. If you're replying on a particular session topic, please update the Subject so that the subthreads are easier to

Re: [Openstack-operators] Designate keystone auth issue

Thanks Kris appreciate your help, added the below lines under [keystone_authtoken] now it is connecting to keystone [keystone_authtoken] auth_uri = http://controller:5000/v2.0 identity_uri = http://controller:35357/ admin_tenant_name = service admin_user = designate admin_password = ATTlabs1!

Re: [Openstack] Control network access between tenant networks in same neutron L3 router?

"Hong Hui Xiao" wrote on 05/09/2016 10:55:17 PM: > ... > I think the neutron fwaas can meet your requirement. Try "neutron help | > grep firewall" and [1] to see more. > > > [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/FWaaS > > > HongHui Xiao(肖宏辉) > > > > From:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS Agent extension for Newton cycle

It is always hard to find a day and time that is good for everyone around the globe:-) The first meeting will still be UTC 1700 ~ UTC 1800 May 17 on Neutron channel. In the meeting, we can see if we can reach consensus on a new meeting time. Cathy -Original Message- From: Takashi

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [designate] multi-tenancy in Neutron's DNS integration

Whoops. What I just said was wrong if it hadn't been explicitly overwritten. I think you will end up having to do a port-list looking for the DHCP port(s). http://paste.openstack.org/show/496604/ On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Kevin Benton wrote: > neutron subnet-show

[openstack-dev] [third-party] Are you getting value from the 8:00 utc Tuesday meeting?

I've been chairing this meeting for about 3 releases now and in this last release it has mostly been myself and lennyb, who also attends the Monday 15:00 utc third-party meeting that I chair. Are you getting value from the Tuesday 8:00 utc third-party meeting? If yes, please make yourself known.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [designate] multi-tenancy in Neutron's DNS integration

neutron subnet-show with the UUID of the subnet they have a port on will tell you. On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Mike Spreitzer wrote: > "Hayes, Graham" wrote on 05/10/2016 09:30:26 AM: > > > ... > > > Ah, that may be what I want. BTW, I am not

Re: [Openstack] Heat autoscaling: heat.engine.resource Forbidden: You are not authorized to perform the requested action.

Hi, no, "heat_stack_owner" role is actually not needed in MOS 8.0. Earlier it was used as a special role to pass via trusts, but now all roles are passed via trust by default. You also do not have to be "admin" either, priviledge "escalation" is handled by Heat using Keystone V3 trusts and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On 10/05/2016 01:01, Gregory Haynes wrote: > > On Mon, May 9, 2016, at 03:54 PM, John Dickinson wrote: >> On 9 May 2016, at 13:16, Gregory Haynes wrote: >>> >>> This is a bit of an aside but I am sure others are wondering the same >>> thing - Is there some info (specs/etherpad/ML thread/etc) that

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [senlin] [keystone] [ceilometer] [telemetry] Questions about api-ref launchpad bugs

> > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Atsushi SAKAI > wrote: > Hello Anne > > I have several question when I am reading through etherpad's (in > progress). > It would be appreciated to answer these questions. > > 1)Should api-ref launchpad **bugs** be moved to each modules

Re: [Openstack-operators] Designate keystone auth issue

Which section of the config did you add that to? The [keystone_authtoken] section? Also that section seems to want auth_host: https://github.com/openstack/designate/blob/master/etc/designate/designate.conf.sample#L158 ___ Kris

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party][openstack][CI] Examples required for "single_node_ci_data.yaml" config file

It’s documented here: http://docs.openstack.org/infra/openstackci/third_party_ci.html#configure-masterless-puppet “Modify /etc/puppet/environments/common.yaml as you need using the parameter documentation described in single_node_ci.pp or logserver.pp. These are the top level puppet class that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Nominating Micha?? Dulko to Cinder Core

On 05/10/2016 07:46 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > It has been one week and all very positive feedback. I have now added > Michał to the cinder-core group. > > Welcome Michał! Glad to have your expertise in the group. > > Sean Thank you all for mentoring and support! I'll do my best to fulfill the

[Openstack-operators] Designate keystone auth issue

Hi All, I am trying to integrate designate(Dnaas) with my existing kilo environment and deployed designate in a separate node where I specified to connect to keystone(controller) server but still it is hitting on localhost while am trying to do api calls. designate conf: auth_uri =

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

Forget package management for a moment; we can figure it out if we need to. The question is "Why Go" which I've pondered for a while. If you need to write a multithreaded app, Python's GIL makes it very hard to do. It is one reason why I pushed for HTTPD as the Keystone front end.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [barbican]barbican github installation failing

Uwsgi is a way to run the API portion of a python code base. You most likely need to install uwsgi for you operating system. http://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ ___ Kris Lindgren Senior Linux Systems Engineer GoDaddy

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev][barbican]barbican github installation failing

Uwsgi is a way to run the API portion of a python code base. You most likely need to install uwsgi for you operating system. http://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ ___ Kris Lindgren Senior Linux Systems Engineer GoDaddy

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

Excerpts from Rayson Ho's message of 2016-05-10 07:19:23 -0700: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Tim Bell wrote: > > I hope that the packaging technologies are considered as part of the TC > evaluation of a new language. While many alternative approaches are > available, a

[Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev][barbican]barbican github installation failing

Hi, I have a 4 node working setup of openstack (1 controller, 1 network node, 2 compute node). I am trying to use ssl offload feature of lbaas v2. For that I need tls containers, hence barbican. I did a git clone of barbican repo from https://github.com/openstack/barbican Then ./bin/barbican.sh

[openstack-dev] [barbican]barbican github installation failing

Hi, I have a 4 node working setup of openstack (1 controller, 1 network node, 2 compute node). I am trying to use ssl offload feature of lbaas v2. For that I need tls containers, hence barbican. I did a git clone of barbican repo from https://github.com/openstack/barbican Then ./bin/barbican.sh

Re: [openstack-dev] Wiki

On 05/10/2016 12:48 PM, Dan Smith wrote: >>> Hmm... that's unfortunate, as we were trying to get some of our less >>> ephemeral items out of random etherpads and into the wiki (which has the >>> value of being google indexed). > > Yeah, I'm kinda surprised anyone would consider a wiki-less world.

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] CentOS binary and source gate failed due to the rabbitmq

Paul, Please run strace with -f (trace child processes). What you have there is not sufficient to do the job. FWIW erlang -16 is totally busted in CentOS because of logging, and erlang -17 is ready for testing which fixes the erlang crashes. Erlang-15 introduced ipv6 which could also be the

Re: [openstack-dev] Wiki

>> Hmm... that's unfortunate, as we were trying to get some of our less >> ephemeral items out of random etherpads and into the wiki (which has the >> value of being google indexed). Yeah, I'm kinda surprised anyone would consider a wiki-less world. I'm definitely bummed at the thought of losing

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Austin summit priorities session recap

On 5/10/2016 11:24 AM, Alexandre Levine wrote: Hi Matt, Sorry I couldn't reply earlier - was away. I'm worrying about ScaleIO ephemeral storage backend (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/scaleio-ephemeral-storage-backend) which is not in this list but various clients are very

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Stepping down from puppet core

Thanks for your work Clayton! =D 2016-05-10 13:30 GMT-03:00 Matt Fischer : > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Clayton O'Neill > wrote: > >> I’d like to step down as a core reviewer for the OpenStack Puppet >> modules. For the last cycle I’ve had very

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Stepping down from puppet core

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Clayton O'Neill wrote: > I’d like to step down as a core reviewer for the OpenStack Puppet > modules. For the last cycle I’ve had very little time to spend > reviewing patches, and I don’t expect that to change in the next > cycle. In

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Austin summit priorities session recap

Hi Matt, Sorry I couldn't reply earlier - was away. I'm worrying about ScaleIO ephemeral storage backend (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/scaleio-ephemeral-storage-backend) which is not in this list but various clients are very interested in having it working along with or instead

Re: [openstack-dev] [OVN] [networking-ovn] [networking-sfc] SFC and OVN

Ryan, Let me do that - I assume adding them to plugin.py is the right approach. I have cleaned up https://github.com/doonhammer/networking-ovn and did a merge so it should be a lot easier to see the changes. I am going to cleanup ovs/ovn next. Once I have everything cleaned up and make sure it

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [QA] running Fuel tests using nodepool

As a frequent tinc user I'd be interested to see the code you are using to manage tinc into doing this. Is that code available somewhere? On Tue, May 10, 2016, at 09:02 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 05/10/2016 08:54 AM, Vladimir Eremin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've investigated status of nodepool

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] [QA] running Fuel tests using nodepool

On 05/10/2016 08:54 AM, Vladimir Eremin wrote: > Hi, > > I've investigated status of nodepool multi node testing and fuel-qa > approaches, and I wanna share my opinion on moving Fuel testing on > OpenStack and nodepool. Awesome! This is a great writeup - and hopefully will be useful as we

Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova][scheduler] Specifying Qualitative requirements for a VM

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: > Currently we load both quantitative (how much disk, RAM, etc) and qualitative > (SSD vs. spinning, special chipsets, etc.) into the flavor that a user can > request. As the number of qualitative features has been increasing,

Re: [Openstack] Heat autoscaling: heat.engine.resource Forbidden: You are not authorized to perform the requested action.

Hi again, these are the roles I have : #openstack role list +--+-+ | ID | Name| +--+-+ | 0d77782f1ae54fa799b0585b267fb746 | ResellerAdmin | |

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Watcher module for Puppet

ack on my side. So you'll need to create a governance patch like: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/252959/ and project-config patch to create the repo like: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/251857/ Once it's done, PTL (currently me) will review it. Once the module is created, we will use

  1   2   >