Re: [Openstack] Stable/ocata patches

On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 05:18:21PM +, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > Are we blocking patches for stable Ocata? It is really unclear why [i] is > blocked. My understanding is that bugs can be backported? This was hit under > load testing and caused neutron to break. During this stabilisation phase

[Openstack] [OpenStack] [Fuel] Packing kernel drivers into target image.

Hi everyone, I'm using Fuel 9.1 to deploy OpenStack, but I found that the kernel still too old to support Intel i219-LM NIC card. So I'm followed the instruction from OpenStack Documents and built the bootstrap kernel with latest e1000e driver. Then tested and it successfully catch i219-LM

Re: [openstack-dev] [ovs-discuss] [neutron][networking-ovn] OpenStack Newton using OVN as mechanism driver is giving error.

Hi Numan, Thanks for the input. I did a fresh install again and used an older OVS 2.6 package.(not using the TOT). Things are working now. Pranab On 2 February 2017 at 19:19, Numan Siddique wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 6:05 PM, pranab boruah

Re: [Openstack-operators] OSA Newton Release Deployment in test environment

Thanks Salman. But in my case MTU sizes are same. Anybody having any other opinion on this? Regards, Amit On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 2:13 AM, Salman Toor wrote: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] ocata release?

Done - https://review.openstack.org/gitweb?p=openstack/networking-l2gw.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/stable/ocata A luta continua On 2/6/17, 8:51 AM, "Gary Kotton" wrote: Hi, Yes, I will go and do this. Thanks Gary On 2/6/17, 4:05 AM, "Takashi

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] ocata release?

thank you. On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > Yes, I will go and do this. > Thanks > Gary > > On 2/6/17, 4:05 AM, "Takashi Yamamoto" wrote: > > hi, > > is anyone going to cut ocata release/branch for networking-l2gw? > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] [neutron] Horizon support for Neutron Trunks - PTL approval needed

That idea has merit, though I don't know what the scope for such a 'neutron-ui' might be. I'm definitely supportive of the Neutron Trunks UI efforts, but it'd be good to get an answer on this scope question before rolling along and creating the project. Richard On 6 February 2017 at 12:14,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] ocata release?

Hi, Yes, I will go and do this. Thanks Gary On 2/6/17, 4:05 AM, "Takashi Yamamoto" wrote: hi, is anyone going to cut ocata release/branch for networking-l2gw? __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Summit Boston-CFP closes February 6th

Should be good for another 24.5 hours now :) Get those presentations in! On 廿十七年二月六日 暮 01:26, shubham sharma wrote: Hi, I am in IST timezone (UTC+5:30) and I am getting error in submitting proposal with following error. " *Warning!* Call for Presentations is closed!. " Anybody else facing

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Summit Boston-CFP closes February 6th

Hi, I am in IST timezone (UTC+5:30) and I am getting error in submitting proposal with following error. " *Warning!* Call for Presentations is closed!. " Anybody else facing this issue? Regards Shubham On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 12:44 AM, Erin Disney wrote: > Hi Everyone- > >

Re: [Openstack] Trove Shadow Tenant

Ah, are you saying that "shadow tenant" is not possible in standard Openstack? (I did wonder if that was the case). I like your idea about putting the trove guest config on tmpfs, that could be the answer! (I guess as the standard images have no swap either that stops another line of attack

Re: [Openstack-operators] Trove Shadow Tenant

Hi Sergio, I’m very interested in this feature too, it might be worth asking in the openstack-trove IRC channel or on the openstack-dev mailing list (adding a [trove] in the subject should get their attention) to get some answers to this question. Cheers, Sam > On 4 Feb 2017, at 1:34 am,

[openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] ocata release?

hi, is anyone going to cut ocata release/branch for networking-l2gw? __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [Openstack] Trove Shadow Tenant

Thanks you all for your answers. I'm working with Trove on a Public Cloud and we have a separate RabbitMQ Cluster just for Trove. I now understand that the use of a "shadow tenant" it's a very specific implementation of Trove. Today, the only security concern we have is the rabbitmq password

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > hi, > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> Excerpts from Takashi Yamamoto's message of 2017-01-26 11:42:48 +0900: >>> hi, >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 2:17 AM, Doug

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] [neutron] Horizon support for Neutron Trunks - PTL approval needed

If the horizon team would like neutron features to live outside, I wonder if it would make more sense to create a new 'neutron-ui' repo instead of it being trunk specific. That way we don't have to come up with a new repo for every new feature that needs a horizon UI. On Feb 3, 2017 09:26, "Bence

[openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] ocata

tap-as-a-service folks, unless anyone objects, i'll make a ocata release and thus stable branch this week. (otherwise the CI of consuming subprojects will break) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] [trove] trove 7.0.0.0rc1 (ocata)

Hello everyone, A new release candidate for trove for the end of the Ocata cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/trove/ Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this candidate will be formally

Re: [Openstack] Trove Shadow Tenant

Hi Sergio, With respect to the rabbit security - you can (and probably should) use a different rabbit server for the trove message queue i.e not your openstack rabbit. I *think* this is mentioned in the trove deployment docs these days (it didn't used to be), and it is easy to miss wherever

Re: [Openstack] Services DOWN - why?

I can’t see anything wrong here! bladeA01:~# openstack volume service list | egrep -v '^\+|ID |Binary .* Host' | sort -k4 | grep bladeA09 | cinder-scheduler | bladeA09 | nova | enabled | down | 2017-02-05T20:09:41.00 | | cinder-backup| bladeA09 | nova | enabled | down |

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [gate] [all] openstack services footprint lead to oom-kill in the gate

On 2/5/2017 1:19 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Also I wonder if there's ever been any serious consideration given to switching to protobuf? Feels like one could make oslo.versionedobjects a wrapper around protobuf relatively easily, but perhaps that's already been explored in a forum that I wasn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [gate] [all] openstack services footprint lead to oom-kill in the gate

Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2017-02-04 16:09:56 -0600: > On 2/2/2017 4:01 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > > > > The only services that are running on Apache in standard gate jobs are > > keystone and the placement api. Everything else is still the > > oslo.service stack (which is basically

[Openstack] Stable/ocata patches

Hi, Are we blocking patches for stable Ocata? It is really unclear why [i] is blocked. My understanding is that bugs can be backported? This was hit under load testing and caused neutron to break. Thanks Gary [i] https://review.openstack.org/429388 ___

[Openstack] [Fuel] Cannot access Fuel 10.0 UI because of unavailable Nailgun server

Hello, I have attempted installing Fuel on my IBM server for testing purposes. I currently find myself in a similar situation as the one described in this Openstack ask post: https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/84510/fuel-ui-network-error/ I can ping to and from the server, and when I try

Re: [Openstack-operators] Encrypted Cinder Volume Deployment

Just an update on this: I've confirmed that specifying a fixed_key in both Cinder and Nova works quite easily. However, if the key is changed, volumes created with the original fixed_key are irrecoverable, and there doesn't seem to be a way to safely rotate fixed keys... I spent some time trying

[Openstack] Got error while keystone installing

Hi all, I follow openstack install guaid( http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/zh_CN/install-guide-ubuntu/keystone-services.html, for english it's http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/install-guide-ubuntu/keystone-services.html ). And in keystone service installing, I got error as bellow. I don't know