Hi,
I meet a problem like this recently:
When attaching a volume to an instance, in the xml, the disk is described
as:
[image: Inline image 1]
where the serial number here is the volume uuid in Cinder. While inside the
vm:
in /dev/disk/by-id, there is a link for /vdb with the name of
Ops, forgot references:
[1]
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/1cc15701cd89b0ce695bbc5cff3a2bf3e2efd25f/include/uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h#L54
[2]
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/1cc15701cd89b0ce695bbc5cff3a2bf3e2efd25f/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c#L363
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 2:35 PM,
Note that I don't have cinder installed. The docs said the block storage
service was optional. I was following the newton guide here:
https://docs.openstack.org/newton/install-guide-rdo/launch-instance-provider.html
so
the config files should be the same as the site. Running a controller and
Adriano, you now have +2 vote and can approve patches :) Welcome!
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 16 Jan 2018, 05:03 +0700, Lingxian Kong , wrote:
> welcome to the team, Adriano!
>
>
> Cheers,
> Lingxian Kong (Larry)
>
> > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:11 PM, Renat Akhmerov
On 01/15/2018 01:57 PM, Satish Patel wrote:
I am planning to build openstack on production and big question is
network (legacy vs DVR) but in DVR big concern is number of Public IP
used on every compute node, I am planning to add max 100 node in
cluster in that case it will use 100 public IP for
Clark Boylan writes:
> Hello,
>
> I think we are very close to being ready to merge the zuulv3 feature
> branch into master in both the Zuul and Nodepool repos. In particular
> we merged https://review.openstack.org/#/c/523951/ which should
> prevent breakages for anyone
On 01/16/2018 12:11 AM, Frank Jansen wrote:
do you have any insight into the availability of a physical
environment for the ARM64 cloud?
I’m curious, as there may be a need for downstream testing, which I
would assume will want to make use of our existing OSP CI framework.
Sorry, not 100%
welcome to the team, Adriano!
Cheers,
Lingxian Kong (Larry)
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:11 PM, Renat Akhmerov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’d like to promote Adriano Petrich to the Mistral core team. Adriano has
> shown the good review rate and quality at least over the last two
Boris,
Thank you for all the contributions you've made to the project. I always
found your reviews extremely thorough and they certainly improved the
quality of our code. I'm sad to see you go, but I'm relieved to know
that you're not completely leaving us :)
This goes without being said, but
Hey!
I don't work on Keystone as much as I used to any more, so i'm
stepping down from core reviewers.
Don't expect to get rid of me though. I still work on OpenStack-related
stuff and i will annoy you all in #openstack-keystone and in other IRC
channels.
On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 17:21 +, Mooney, Sean K wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: mdu...@redhat.com [mailto:mdu...@redhat.com]
> > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 4:46 PM
> > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [kuryr][os-vif][nova] os-vif 1.8.0 breaks
On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 12:30 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 01/15/2018 11:45 AM, mdu...@redhat.com wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > os-vif commit [1] introduced a non-backward compatible change to the
> > Subnet object - removal of ips field. Turns out kuryr-kubernetes were
> > depending on that e.g. here [1]
Excerpts from Erno Kuvaja's message of 2018-01-15 12:59:44 +:
> I think the worst case scenario is that we scrape together what ever
> we can just to have something to say that we test it and not have
> consistency nor clear responsibility of who, what and how.
> (Unfortunately I think this
Hi Dinesh,
Thanks for the info.
'recovery_method' (choose from 'auto', 'reserved_host', 'auto_priority',
'rh_priority')
What should be put for
Same as the segment host
What should be put as , it seems it
accepts any arbitrary values.
Any more pointers. Much appreciated.
Thank you.
There is also kolla-kube
https://github.com/openstack/kolla-kubernetes
> On Jan 15, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Melvin Hillsman wrote:
>
> There are also the options of OpenStack-Ansible[0] or Kolla-Ansible[1]
>
> [0]
Excerpts from Gaetan's message of 2018-01-15 19:29:01 +0100:
> >
> >
> > > I guess it somehow didn't used my build of the pbr package when
> > > running in gitlab pipeline.
> >
> > It sounds like the CE pipeline is not building packages in the same way?
> > Or is using an old version of pbr?
> >
>
There are also the options of OpenStack-Ansible[0] or Kolla-Ansible[1]
[0] https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/openstack-ansible/pike/
[1] https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/kolla-ansible/pike/
--
Kind regards,
Melvin Hillsman
mrhills...@gmail.com
mobile: +1 (832)
I am planning to build openstack on production and big question is
network (legacy vs DVR) but in DVR big concern is number of Public IP
used on every compute node, I am planning to add max 100 node in
cluster in that case it will use 100 public IP for compute node, Ouch!
If i use legacy compute
On 01/15/2018 12:58 PM, Satish Patel wrote:
But Fuel is active project, isn't it?
https://docs.openstack.org/fuel-docs/latest/
No, it is no longer developed or supported.
-jay
___
Mailing list:
>
>
> > I guess it somehow didn't used my build of the pbr package when
> > running in gitlab pipeline.
>
> It sounds like the CE pipeline is not building packages in the same way?
> Or is using an old version of pbr?
>
> I guess it was the pbr version from pypi.python.org, not my customized
build
But Fuel is active project, isn't it?
https://docs.openstack.org/fuel-docs/latest/
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Remo Mattei wrote:
> OOO, I would be careful with mira fuel since they stop their deployments.
>
>
> Remo
>
> On Jan 15, 2018, at 8:29 AM, Satish Patel
On 01/15/2018 11:45 AM, mdu...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
os-vif commit [1] introduced a non-backward compatible change to the
Subnet object - removal of ips field. Turns out kuryr-kubernetes were
depending on that e.g. here [1] and we're now broken with os-vif 1.8.0.
kuryr-kubernetes is saving the
The ironic tempest plugin code that was in openstack/ironic and
openstack/ironic-inspector has been moved to
openstack/ironic-tempest-plugin/
As of 10-Jan-2018 (Wednesday) the plugin code was deleted from
openstack/ironic and openstack/ironic-inspector. All users of the tempest
plugin code need
> -Original Message-
> From: mdu...@redhat.com [mailto:mdu...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 4:46 PM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [kuryr][os-vif][nova] os-vif 1.8.0 breaks
> kuryr-kubernetes
>
> Hi,
>
> os-vif commit [1] introduced a
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Kendall Nelson
wrote:
> Election details: https://governance.openstack.org/election/
>
> Please read the stipulations and timelines for candidates and electorate
> contained in this governance documentation.
>
> Be aware, in the PTL
Election details: https://governance.openstack.org/election/
Please read the stipulations and timelines for candidates and electorate
contained in this governance documentation.
Be aware, in the PTL elections if the program only has one candidate, that
candidate is acclaimed and there will be no
Dear all,
A gentle reminder for our Wednesday meeting at 15:00 UTC
A draft of the 2018 agenda is available, you are very welcome to add any item.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/massively_distributed_ircmeetings_2018
For the record, the 2017 agenda is still available here:
Excerpts from Gaetan's message of 2018-01-15 17:29:01 +0100:
> First, thanks a lot for your support and your kindness ! Really appreciate
> that :)
>
> > > Do you know where I need to hack PBR to fix it?
> >
> > So 'pbr' correctly parses the prefixed tags, but it's just the output
> > packages
Satish,
TripleO has taken the lead, but both are equally good.
Kamal
On 15-Jan-2018 22:11, "Satish Patel" wrote:
> I’m planning to deploy production openstack, after lots of reading seems
> tripleO and mirantis looks good so far, which one people most prefers in
>
Hi,
os-vif commit [1] introduced a non-backward compatible change to the
Subnet object - removal of ips field. Turns out kuryr-kubernetes were
depending on that e.g. here [1] and we're now broken with os-vif 1.8.0.
kuryr-kubernetes is saving the VIF objects into the K8s resources
annotations, so
I’m planning to deploy production openstack, after lots of reading seems
tripleO and mirantis looks good so far, which one people most prefers in
production?
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to
First, thanks a lot for your support and your kindness ! Really appreciate
that :)
> > Do you know where I need to hack PBR to fix it?
>
> So 'pbr' correctly parses the prefixed tags, but it's just the output
> packages (sdists, wheels) that always unversioned? If so, this sounds
> correct.
On 18-01-13 00:41:28, Matthew Thode wrote:
> https://review.openstack.org/531788 is the review we are seeing it in,
> but 2.22.0 failed as well.
>
> I'm guessing it was introduced in either
>
> https://github.com/openstack/oslo.serialization/commit/c1a7079c26d27a2e46cca26963d3d9aa040bdbe8
> or
>
Hello. Any comments/thoughts?
This issue is generic to neutron. not specific to networking-odl.
So this should be addressed as Neutron wide, and neutron and sub-project should
be addressed uniformly.
Thanks,
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:52:37PM +0200,
Mike Kolesnik wrote:
>
Thanks Remo,
Agree’d, ephemeral will pretty much always be faster, I’m seeing orders of
magnitude difference between the 2, at times. After a bunch of testing, I’m
pretty convinced its not KVM/QEMU or iscsi configurations, it’s looking like
its something with my 3par configuration.
Hey Ivan,
Running 3par for my back end.. Just replied back to another user, but at this
point I don’t think its anything on my Openstack or iscsi set up, After doing
a bunch of tests, with no consistent results, time to dig into my 3par config.
Thanks for the reply..
JC
Jim Colestock
On 01/12/2018 07:21 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018, at 3:27 PM, Dan Radez wrote:
>> fwiw
>> We've been building arm images for tripleo and posting them.
>> https://images.rdoproject.org/aarch64/pike/delorean/current-tripleo-rdo/
>>
>>
>> This uses delorean and overcloud build:
>>
On 2018-01-15 16:11, Stephen Finucane wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 15:39 +, Stephen Finucane wrote:
>> I'm not sure what the procedure for this is but here goes.
>>
>> I've noticed that the 'os-api-ref' project seems to have its own group
>> of cores [1], many of whom are no longer working
On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 15:39 +, Stephen Finucane wrote:
> I'm not sure what the procedure for this is but here goes.
>
> I've noticed that the 'os-api-ref' project seems to have its own group
> of cores [1], many of whom are no longer working on OpenStack (at
> least, not full-time), and has a
On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 10:25 +0100, Gaetan wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have submitted this patch ([1]) that add support for v_version in
> PBR. Basically I can tag v1.0.0 instead of 1.0.0 to release 1.0.0.
>
> However, after rework it appears PBR does not behaves well, even if
> the unit tests pass:
>
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2018-01-15 14:40:14 +:
> On 2018-01-09 10:25:56 +0100 (+0100), Gaetan wrote:
> > I have submitted this patch ([1]) that add support for v_version
> > in PBR. Basically I can tag v1.0.0 instead of 1.0.0 to release
> > 1.0.0.
> [...]
>
> Looks like the
Excerpts from Adam Coldrick's message of 2018-01-15 11:26:14 +:
> On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 21:30 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > On 2018-01-12 15:57:44 -0500 (-0500), Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > > The storyboard client docs mention an "access token" [1] as
> > > something
> > > a client needs in
On 2018-01-09 10:25:56 +0100 (+0100), Gaetan wrote:
> I have submitted this patch ([1]) that add support for v_version
> in PBR. Basically I can tag v1.0.0 instead of 1.0.0 to release
> 1.0.0.
[...]
Looks like the patch you linked has since merged. Any issues with it
so far?
> Second point, to
Hi,
Here is the status update / focus settings mail for 2018 w3.
Bugs
[High]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1742935TestServiceUpdateNotificationSample
fails intermittently: u'host2' != u'host1': path:
root.payload.nova_object.data.host
The openstack-tox-functional (and
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-01-08 09:55:26 -0500:
> Stephen (sfinucan) has been working on pbr, oslo.config, and
> oslo.policy and reviewing several of the other Oslo libraries for
> a while now. His reviews are always helpful and I think he would
> make a good addition to the
Hi Yuan,
please compare similar issue described in this bug report [1] and the
corresponding fix [2].
As Craig explained in his comment to patch set 4, Kafka server closes idle
connections after around 10 minutes, which causes first write to the topic fail.
I hope it helps.
Witek
[1]
+1!
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 at 09:12, Renat Akhmerov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’d like to promote Adriano Petrich to the Mistral core team. Adriano has
> shown the good review rate and quality at least over the last two cycles
> and implemented several important features
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Colleen Murphy wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We have governance review under debate[1] that we need the community's help
> on.
> The debate is over what recommendation the TC should make to the Interop team
> on where the tests it uses for the
On 2018-01-11 22:55, Mark McClain wrote:
> Sean, Andreas-
>
> Sorry I missed Andres’ message earlier in December about retiring astara.
> Everyone is correct that development stopped a good while ago. We attempted
> in Barcelona to find others in the community to take over the day-to-day
>
On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 21:30 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2018-01-12 15:57:44 -0500 (-0500), Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > The storyboard client docs mention an "access token" [1] as
> > something
> > a client needs in order to create stories and make other sorts of
> > changes. They don't explain
Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 12:37 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> [...]
>> How does this sound as an approach? Does anyone have any reservations
>> about using storyboard this way?
>
> Sounds like a good idea, and will help to "Eat Our Own Dog Food" (if
>
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 7:46 AM, Moshe Levi wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We are trying to add container support ovs hw offload.
>
> We were able to do the deployment a few weeks ago, but now we getting an
> errors .
>
> Jan 14 07:14:32 localhost os-collect-config: "2018-01-14
Hi,
I’d like to promote Adriano Petrich to the Mistral core team. Adriano has shown
the good review rate and quality at least over the last two cycles and
implemented several important features (including new useful YAQL/JINJA
functions).
Please vote whether you agree to add Adriano to the
Hi,
you should check your config settings again, especially the "auth_url"
settings in the section(s) "[keystone_authtoken]" of all the config
files.
Are all the services up (nova, cinder and neutron) and running? What
is the output of 'nova service-list'?
Have you checked other log files
This may be due to misconfiguration in nova.conf on the compute node. You may
have provided incorrect information how to contact Keystone. Double-check the
[keystone_authtoken] section, in particular the URLs in there.
Also check the Nova compute log on the compute host for additional
On 01/13/2018 01:26 PM, Ian Wienand wrote:
In terms of implementation, since you've already looked, I think
essentially diskimage_builder/block_device/level1.py create() will
need some moderate re-factoring to call a gpt implementation in
response to a gpt label, which could translate
56 matches
Mail list logo