It's not specific to mysql (or sql at all), but keystone is using
dogpile.cache around driver calls to a similar effect.
http://dogpilecache.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
It can persist to memcache, redis, etc.
https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/common/cache/core.py
On
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.netwrote:
*) They help casual contributors *more* than long time core
contributors : and those are the folk that are most likely to give up
and walk away. Keeping barriers to entry low is an important part of
making
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.netwrote:
On 26 October 2013 08:40, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
*) They help casual contributors *more* than long
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah chmo...@enovance.comwrote:
Hello,
If i understand correctly (and I may be wrong) we are moving away from
user_crud to use /credentials for updating password including ec2. The
credentials facility was implemented in this blueprint :
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
One of the efforts that we're working on from the QA team is tooling that
ensures we aren't stack tracing into our test logs during normal tempest
runs. Random stack traces are scary to cloud admins consuming OpenStack
logs,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.netwrote:
On 24 October 2013 07:34, Mark Washenberger
mark.washenber...@markwash.net wrote:
Hi folks!
1) Adopt 0.1.8 as the minimum version in openstack-requirements.
2) Do nothing (i.e. let Glance behavior depend on
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote:
Floren,
Just just need to send a patch to gerrit.
From you local repo, do the necessary fixes and be sure everything is just
as you want.
Then simply run:
#git commit -a --amend
#git review
The only gotcha here
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
Starting a thread to discuss $subject, as requested in:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51558/
First a bit of background. I wrote a keystoneclient patch, and ayoung
stated he'd like it tested via tempest
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:19 PM, David Stanek dsta...@dstanek.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 10/18/2013 12:04 PM, Brant Knudson wrote:
2) git cloneing the keystoneclient doesn't work well with parallel
testing (we have a similar problem in
I'll be finalizing the design summit schedule [1] for keystone
following the weekly meeting [2] on Tuesday, October 22nd 18:00 UTC.
Please have your proposals submitted before then.
So far I think everyone has done a GREAT job self-organizing the
proposed sessions to avoid overlap, but we
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll be finalizing the design summit schedule [1] for keystone
following the weekly meeting [2] on Tuesday, October 22nd 18:00 UTC.
Please have your proposals submitted before then.
So far I think everyone has done
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD -
Corvallis) mark.m.mil...@hp.com wrote:
Hello,
I have a generic question about the logic now available for LDAP users in
association with bug 1209440. How do you associate a read-only LDAP user with
a domain?
I suppose it
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Morgan Fainberg m...@metacloud.com wrote:
Hi Fellow Developers (and those who interface with keystone at the code
level),
I wanted to reach out to the ML and see what the opinions were about
starting to stabilize the internal APIs (wherever possible) for the
On Friday, October 11, 2013, Mayank Mittal wrote:
Hi Teams,
Please suggest and guide for starting to contribute in development. About
me - I have been working on L2/L3 protocol, SNMP, NMS development and ready
to contribute as a full timer to openstack.
PS : My interest lies in LB and
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Recently in the TripleO meeting we identified situations where we need
to make it very clear that it is ok to pick up somebody else's patch
and finish it. We are broadly distributed, time-zone-wise, and I know
other teams
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD -
Corvallis) mark.m.mil...@hp.com wrote:
Hello,
I am attempting to test the Havana v3 OS-EP-FILTER extension with the
latest RC1 bits and I get a 404 error response.
The documentation actually shows 2 different URIs for this
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Jon Maron jma...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On Oct 7, 2013, at 10:02 PM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Jon Maron jma...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use the keystone client code in savanna/utils
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Jon Maron jma...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use the keystone client code in savanna/utils/openstack
but my attempt to sue it yield:
'Api v2.0 endpoint not found in service identity'
This sounds like the service catalog for keystone itself
on a domain-basis:
- availability zones and/or host aggregates
- quotas
/me facepalm
I can't believe I forgot about these. I take back the yet to hear!
- IP ranges (ok, maybe a quantum discussion)
Henry
On 1 Oct 2013, at 06:45, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30
On Monday, September 30, 2013, Neil Zhao wrote:
Hi, All,
I'm running the following cmd yet got errors:
$ keystone tenant-create --name=admin
WARNING: Bypassing authentication using a token endpoint
(authentication credentials are being ignored).
An unexpected error prevented the
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I've been looking into how Nova might support Keystone V3 domains and I'm
having a bit of trouble getting my head around exactly how we'd use domain
scoped tokens.
With the V3 Nova API we no longer specify the
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Brant Knudson b...@acm.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Ralf Haferkamp rha...@suse.de wrote:
As Dolph already suggested we should not allow usernames that just differ
in
capitalization (JDoe vs. jdoe) to co-exist. (Which could be an
argument
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:45 AM, Henry Nash hen...@linux.vnet.ibm.comwrote:
Hi
Do we specify somewhere whether text field matching in the API is case
sensitive or in-sensitive? I'm thinking about filters, as well as user and
domain names in authentication. I think our current
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
tl;dr - easy_install sucks, so use pip
It is common practice in python to run:
python setup.py install
or
python setup.py develop
So much so that we spend a giant amount of effort to make sure that
those always
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Steve Martinelli steve...@ca.ibm.comwrote:
Unless I'm mistaken, the project ID should be a UUID.
In our current implementation, it happens to be a UUID4 expressed in hex:
$ python -c import uuid; print uuid.uuid4().hex
I believe it was an auto-incrementing
Hello! I'd like to nominate myself once more as PTL for Keystone.
Since becoming PTL for Keystone last release, I've gained a new perspective
on the community which has changed my understanding of the PTL's role
rather dramatically from what I thought I was getting myself into (by which
I mean, I
projects. If a CVS is found in the po
From: Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com ayo...@redhat.com
To: Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com dolph.math...@gmail.com,
Yee, Guang guang@hp.com guang@hp.com, Henry Nash
hen...@linux.vnet.ibm.com hen...@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Morgan Fainberg
m
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD -
Corvallis) mark.m.mil...@hp.com wrote:
Hello to all you documenters,
** **
I have spent the day reviewing the latest OpenStack Identity API documents
and want to say that you have done a truly TERRIFIC job. The
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com
wrote:
++ Data backups are a solved problem, and no DB admin should trust an
application to perform its own backups.
I'm not completely sure I
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
Looks like this has grown into a full discussion. Opening up to the dev
mailing list.
On 09/16/2013 10:43 AM, Lyle, David (Cloud Services) wrote:
I did run into a couple of fundamental limitations with the policy API as
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Paul Bourke pauldbou...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've submitted https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46474/ to add
ordereddict to openstack/requirements.
Related thread:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015121.html
The
some algorithm on its name.
The SQL policy driver supports names (and any other arbitrary attribute),
although it's not part of the spec. We just need some agreement on the
some algorithm bit (and an implementation!).
** **
Mark
** **
*From:* Dolph Mathews [mailto:dolph.math
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Lyle, David (Cloud Services)
david.l...@hp.com wrote:
Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
Looks like this has grown into a full discussion. Opening up to the dev
mailing list.
On 09/16/2013 10:43 AM, Lyle, David (Cloud Services) wrote:
I did run into a
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:15 AM, David Chadwick d.w.chadw...@kent.ac.ukwrote:
On 11/09/2013 22:05, Adam Young wrote:
What's the use case for including providers in the service catalog?
i.e. why do Identity API clients need to be aware of the Identity
Providers?
In the federation
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Roman Podolyaka rpodoly...@mirantis.comwrote:
I can't agree more with Robert.
Even if it was possible to downgrade all migrations without data loss, it
would be required to make backups before DB schema upgrade/downgrade.
E.g. MySQL doesn't support
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
David Chadwick wrote up an in depth API extension for Federation:
https://review.openstack.org/#**/c/39499https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39499
There is an abfab API proposal as well: https://review.openstack.org/#**
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 12:31 PM, David Chadwick d.w.chadw...@kent.ac.ukwrote:
Further supplementary information to Adam's email below, is that there are
already one further federation protocol profiles that has been published:
for an external Keystone acting as an IdP at
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Jamie Lennox jlen...@redhat.com wrote:
With the aim of replacing httplib and cert validation with requests[1]
I've put forward the following review to use the requests library for
auth_token middleware.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/34161/
This adds 2
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Alex Gaynor wrote:
Many of you have probably seen me send review requests in the last few
weeks
about adding PyPy support to various OpenStack projects. A few people
were
confused by these, so I wanted to fill
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.comwrote:
whenever I run devstack keystone falies to start because dogpile.cache is
not installed; this is easily solved by installing it, but I wonder if it
should be in requirements.txt
Also, since the cache appears to be
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:58 AM, David Stanek dsta...@dstanek.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.comwrote:
whenever I run devstack keystone falies to start because
you *should* have it installed, even though it won't be used :-/
https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/6979ae010d1fa20caeda13c8f88cdf6dbfa259c6/requirements.txt#L22
Salvatore
On 4 September 2013 15:23, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:14 AM
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a question for the keystone folks re the expected behavior when
deleting a trust.
Is it expected that you can only ever delete a trust as the user who
created it, and that you can *not* delete the trust when
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Yongsheng Gong gong...@unitedstack.comwrote:
For admin, we must use admin token. In general, the token from API
context is not of role admin.
So... because the authenticated user making the API request *may not* have
admin access, you're dropping that
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD -
Corvallis) mark.m.mil...@hp.com wrote:
Hello,
** **
I would think you would want to reuse the same token but update the
expiration time as if it were the first time the token had been generated.
That wouldn't work
, 2013 12:24 PM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD -
Corvallis) mark.m.mil...@hp.com wrote:
Hello,
I would think you would want to reuse the same token but update the
expiration time as if it were
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Morgan Fainberg m...@metacloud.com wrote:
I've been doing some pondering on how Keystone handles the various
pluggable systems with it's Manager / Driver architecture.
Currently we implement the base driver class as follows:
There is a driver object that
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 7:48 PM, James E. Blair jebl...@openstack.orgwrote:
Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com writes:
The infra team has done a lot of work in prep for our favorite time of
year, and we've actually landed several upgrades to the gate without
which we'd be in particularly
python-keystoneclient v0.3.2 is now available on pypi [1].
This release notably includes Python lib support for managing consuming
delegated authorization impersonation via the Identity API v3 trusts
extension [2], along with numerous small improvements and bug fixes [3].
[1]:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Jarret Raim jarret.r...@rackspace.comwrote:
Dolph Mathews wrote:
With regard
to:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/key-distribution-server
[...]
Dolph: you don't mention Barbican at all, does that mean that the issue
is settled
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 07:02:04PM +0200, Matthieu Huin wrote:
Hi Steve,
It might be a bit late for this, but here's a script I wrote when
experimenting with trusts:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Daniel P. Berrange
berra...@redhat.comwrote:Commit message quality has improved somewhat since
I first wrote
published
that page, but there's definitely still scope to improve
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.comwrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 09:46:07AM -0500, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Daniel P. Berrange
berra
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Mark Washenberger
mark.washenber...@markwash.net wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
This may interest data-driven types
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 17:20 -0500, Dolph Mathews wrote:
With regard
to:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/key-distribution-server
Well I am of course biased so take my comments with a grain of salt
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Henry Nash hen...@linux.vnet.ibm.comwrote:
Hi
So few comebacks to the various comments:
1) While I understand the idea that a client would follow the next/prev
links returned in collections, I wasn't aware that we considered
'page'/'per-page' as not
With regard to:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/key-distribution-server
During today's project status meeting [1], the state of KDS was discussed
[2]. To quote ttx directly: we've been bitten in the past with late
security-sensitive stuff and I'm a bit worried to ship late code
What problem(s) are you running into when following the above documentation
/ examples?
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD -
Corvallis) mark.m.mil...@hp.com wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for documentation on how to install/configure Apache2 as the
Keystone front
The way paginated links are defined by the v3 API (via `next` and
`previous` links), it can be completely up to the driver as to what the
query parameters look like. So, the client shouldn't have (nor require) any
knowledge of how to build query parameters for pagination. It just needs to
follow
arbitrary and can vary by driver.
On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 19:05 -0500, Dolph Mathews wrote:
The way paginated links are defined by the v3 API (via `next` and
`previous` links), it can be completely up to the driver as to what
the query parameters look like. So, the client shouldn't have (nor
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Monty Taylor wrote:
What if instead we had a repo with a bunch of ReStructureText in it -
perhaps a copy of the TC charter and then a dir for additional things
the TC has decided. That repo would be autopublished to
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Sam Harwell sam.harw...@rackspace.comwrote:
Please excuse me for being vague with many parts of this reply. Since I'm
still learning the terminology used throughout this project, I chose to be
non-specific rather than risk using the wrong name and distract from
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Jorge Williams jorge.willi...@rackspace.com
wrote:
On Aug 6, 2013, at 8:36 AM, Adam Young wrote:
On 08/06/2013 01:19 AM, Jamie Lennox wrote:
Hi all,
Partially in response to the trusts API review in keystoneclient
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/06/2013 10:45 AM, David Chadwick wrote:
On 06/08/2013 14:46, Jay Pipes wrote:
API extensions are more hassle than anything else. Let us promote
standards, not endless extensibility at the expense of usability.
Through feedback on code reviews and blueprints, Morgan clearly has the
best interests of the project itself in mind. I'd love for his votes to
carry a bit more weight!
https://review.openstack.org/#/dashboard/2903
Respond with +1/-1's before Friday, thanks!
-Dolph
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
Hi!
Currently, we make motions by email, then we discuss them by mailing
list, then we discuss them more in IRC, then we vote on them - at which
point the actual thing voted on may or may not get recorded somewhere
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Henry Nash hen...@linux.vnet.ibm.comwrote:
Hi Adam,
Wanted to just give you more detail on the issue I keep pressing on for
your change (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/36731/).
For extensions which create their own private tables, I totally get it.
I'd
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/01/2013 11:40 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Henry Nash hen...@linux.vnet.ibm.comwrote:
Hi Adam,
Wanted to just give you more detail on the issue I keep pressing on for
your change
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Henry Nash hen...@linux.vnet.ibm.comwrote:
Hi
As part of bp
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/policy-on-api-target I
have uploaded some example WIP code showing a proposed approach for just a
few API calls (one easy, one more complex). I'd
There's still appears to be considerable demand for UUID tokens,
considering their simplicity relative to PKI tokens (no additional setup
required, convenient length for copy/pasting around). There are also
trade-offs when deciding between UUID and PKI tokens (e.g. network chatter
vs CPU time,
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD -
Corvallis) mark.m.mil...@hp.com wrote:
Hello Dolph,
I am writing to find out why the “Split the Identity Backend” blueprint (*
** **
*From:* Dolph Mathews [mailto:dolph.math...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, July 18, 2013 2:38 PM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List
*Cc:* Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD - Corvallis)
*Subject:* [keystone] Split the Identity Backend blueprint
** **
** **
On Thu, Jul 18
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Roman Podolyaka rpodoly...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hello, stackers!
Most of you who is interested in work around DB in OpenStack must have
read this thread [1] started by
/2013 01:12 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
Just as a general statement, outside the scope of openstack, I don't
think sqlite is intended to support schema evolution. From the sqlite
docs [1]: SQLite supports a limited subset of ALTER TABLE. [...] It is
not possible to rename a column, remove
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 07/11/2013 01:12 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
Just as a general statement, outside the scope of openstack, I don't
think sqlite is intended to support schema evolution. From the sqlite
docs [1]: SQLite supports
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
On 07/15/2013 11:07 PM, Adam Young wrote:
On 07/15/2013 05:46 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 07/15/2013 04:32 PM, Stephen Gran wrote:
On 15/07/13 09:26, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Dolph,
If you do that, then you will be
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 07/11/2013 05:20 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 19:49 -0400, Monty Taylor wrote:
I'd like top-post and hijack this thread for another exception related
thing:
a) Anyone writing code such
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
HI folks
I would like to ask the review criteria in the community.
Should we use exception for non-exceptional cases when we can use
parameter checking?
Example1: Default value for array index
try:
value = list[5]
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:57 PM, David Ripton drip...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/10/2013 02:01 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
HI folks
I would like to ask the review criteria in the community.
Should we use exception
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013, Sean Dague wrote:
Yesterday in the very exciting run around to figure out why the gate was
broken, we realized something interesting. Because of the way the gate
process pip requirements (one project at a time), on a current gate run we
actually install and
On Tuesday, July 9, 2013, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2013-07-09 06:19:19 -0700:
On 07/08/2013 11:06 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2013-07-08 17:32:30 -0700:
On 07/08/2013 04:35 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Adam
I'm assuming you're referring to testing backend drivers as opposed to
database migrations (tests/test_sql_upgrade.py).
Backend agnostic tests land in tests/test_backend.py. Backend-specific
tests, overrides, etc belong in tests/test_backend_sql.py,
tests/test_backend_kvs.py, etc.
Generally, you
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 07/09/2013 11:43 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 11:39 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hey
The
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:24 PM, David Ripton drip...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/01/2013 12:49 PM, Brant Knudson wrote:
'Stackers -
I've got a review up in Keystone that converts tables from MyISAM to
InnoDB [0], which I patterned after a change in Nova. One of the
comments in the review is
On Monday, July 1, 2013, Jamie Lennox wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 14:09 -0700, Nachi Ueno wrote:
Hi folks
I'm interested in it too.
I'm working on VPN support for Neutron.
Public key authentication is one of feature milestone in the IPsec
implementation.
But I believe key-pair
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah chmo...@enovance.comwrote:
Hello,
[moving on the public mailing list since this bug is anyway public]
On 3 Jun 2013, at 17:25, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
Apologies for the delayed response on this. We have several related
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/20/2013 11:20 AM, Brian Elliott wrote:
On Jun 19, 2013, at 7:34 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering what people thought about how necessary it is to keep
XML support for the
Previously discussed:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-May/008436.html
tl;dr Don't do any of that!
-Dolph
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Frittoli, Andrea (Cloud Services)
fritt...@hp.com wrote:
Hi folks,
** **
While reviewing nova v3 tests, I realized that
301 - 388 of 388 matches
Mail list logo
