Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Cleaning up inactive meetbot channels

On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 13:06 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-07-20 07:49:08 + (+), Dulko, Michal wrote: [...] Would it be possible to *add* #openstack-helm channel during those changes? [...] Absolutely! I've left a comment on your change linking this ML thread, but I expect

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Cleaning up inactive meetbot channels

On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 19:24 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > For those who are unaware, Freenode doesn't allow any one user to > /join more than 120 channels concurrently. This has become a > challenge for some of the community's IRC bots in the past year, > most recently the "openstack" meetbot

Re: [openstack-dev] Emails for OpenStack R Release Name voting going out - please be patient

On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 06:57 -0500, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 04/06/2017 07:34 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > > > Hey all! > > > > I've started the R Release Name poll and currently am submitting > > everyone's email address to the system. In order to not make our fine > > friends at Carnegie Mellon

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] API-WG PTG recap

On Fri, 2017-03-03 at 17:12 +, Chris Dent wrote: > > # Capabilities Discovery > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/capabilities-pike > > This began as an effort to refine a proposed guideline for > expressing what a cloud can do: > >  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386555/ > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] cinder 10.0.0.0rc1 (ocata)

Hi, With Cinder master being open for Pike development I ask not to merge any changes with DB schema migrations before sanity check migration [1] gets in. It's supposed to block going forward until all of the Ocata's data migrations were executed and should be the first migration in Pike. [1] 

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Can we run cinder-volume and cinder-backup on a same host?

On Fri, 2017-01-20 at 14:15 +0900, Rikimaru Honjo wrote: > Hi Cinder devs, > > I have a question about cinder. > Can I run cinder-volume and cinder-backup on a same host when I using > iscsi backend? > > I afraid that iscsi operations will be conflicted between cinder- > volume and

[openstack-dev] [cinder] [qa] [infra] Proposed new Cinder gate jobs

Hi all, I've seen some confusion around new Cinder CI jobs being proposed to project-config in yesterday's IRC scrollback. This email aims to sum this up and explain purposes of what's being proposed. Background == For a few releases we're aiming to increase our functional and

[openstack-dev] [cinder] PTG planning etherpad

Hi, PTG planning etherpad wasn't advertised on the list, so I'm linking it below. It's still pretty empty, so I guess it's time to start filling it up. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ATL-cinder-ptg-planning Thanks, Michal

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Using \ for multiline statements

On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 17:52 -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 12/22/2016 5:28 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > > > Looking for input from everyone, particularly those with more in- > > depth > > Python knowledge. > > > > In Cinder for some time we have been trying to enforce using () or > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Does cinder use novaclient?

On Tue, 2016-12-20 at 14:44 +0800, lij...@gohighsec.com wrote: > Hi Cinder community, > > Does cinder use novaclient? What's the use of cinder/compute/nova.py? > > I find that there seems to have some problems when construct > novaclient in the file  cinder/compute/nova.py, >  but I think the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 07:58 +0100, Mehdi Abaakouk wrote: Hi, I have recently seen that drbdmanage python library is no more GPL2 but need a end user license agreement [1]. Is this compatible with the driver policy of Cinder ? [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Destructive / HA / fail-over scenarios

On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 15:51 +0300, Timur Nurlygayanov wrote: > Hi OpenStack developers and operators, > > we are going to create the test suite for destructive testing of > OpenStack clouds. We want to hear your feedback and ideas > about possible destructive and failover scenarios which we need

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Exposing project team's metadata in README files

On Fri, 2016-11-25 at 12:38 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote: > Greetings, > > Just a heads up for everyone. The work on this front has moved > forward and the > badges are now being generated as part of the governance CI[0]. > > You can find the list of badges here[1] and the pattern is quite >

[openstack-dev] [cinder][oslo] ZeroMQ support with multibackend

Hi, Cinder is lacking ZeroMQ messaging support in multibackend configurations. This is due to the fact that we're abusing ``Target.server`` property by appending "@backend" suffix to the hostname. This works just fine in RabbitMQ, as it routes messages using queue names, but fails in ZeroMQ when

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Block subtractive schema changes

On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 10:45 +, stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote: > I think this makes sense (helps us spot things which could impact upgrade). > > >Hi Glance Team, > > > >I have registered a blueprint [1] for blocking subtractive schema changes. > >Cinder and Nova are already supporting blocking

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] no more expand/contract for live upgrade?

On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 08:27 +, Tan, Lin wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that expand/migrate/contract was revert in > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239922/ > There is a new CMD 'online_data_migrations' was introduced to Nova and some > data-migration scripts have been added. > So I wonder will

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova]New Quota Subteam on Nova

On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 11:45 -0800, Vilobh Meshram wrote: > Having worked in the area of Quotas for a while now by introducing > features like Cinder Nested Quota Driver [1] [2] I strongly feel that > something like a Nova Quota sub-team will definitely help. Mentioning > about Cinder Quota driver

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have project scope for cinder?

On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 10:56 +0800, hao wang wrote: > Hi guys, > > I notice nova have a clarification of project scope: > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/project_scope.html > > I want to find cinder's, but failed, do you know where to find it? > > It's important to let developers know

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Specifications to support High Availability Active-Active configurations in Cinder

On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 20:17 +0200, Gorka Eguileor wrote: > Hi, > > We finally have ready for review all specifications required to support > High Availability Active/Active configurations in Cinder's Volume nodes. > > There is a Blueprint to track this effort [1] and the specs are as follow: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Adding a new feature in Kilo. Is it possible?

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 18:57 +0100, Michał Dubiel wrote: > Hi all, > We have a simple patch allowing to use OpenContrail's vrouter with > vhostuser vif types (currently only OVS has support for that). We > would like to contribute it. > However, We would like this change to land in the next

Re: [openstack-dev] status of the live upgrade session

On Sat, 2015-10-31 at 12:08 +0800, Gareth wrote: > Hey guys, > > In this summary > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Design_Summit/Mitaka/Etherpads, there > is a live upgrade session. But the linked the etherpad is empty: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-crossproject-upgrades . > > So

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] meeting place for event Monday night in Tokyo ...

On Sun, 2015-10-25 at 22:27 +0900, Mike Perez wrote: > On Oct 25, 2015, at 18:19, Mike Perez wrote: > > >> On Oct 25, 2015, at 10:48, Mike Perez wrote: > >> > >> On 15:54 Oct 21, Jay S. Bryant wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> Not sure where the evening will

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] New extension API for detecting cinder-backup ?

On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 17:36 +, Ramakrishna, Deepti wrote: > Thanks Duncan. > > Should I publish a BP and spec for this? And follow it up with code > changes to the server, client, horizon and documentation? > > Thanks, > Deepti > I believe a BP and spec is required as this is a new

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Rolling upgrades - missing pieces

Hi all, One of our priority goals for Liberty was the adoption of oslo.versionedobjects in order for Cinder to achieve ability to do rolling upgrades. We weren't successful with that in L, and work got postponed to Mitaka. I want to highlight remaining work in that topic as well as other pieces

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Rolling upgrades - missing pieces

On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 11:19 -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 03:10:16PM +0000, Dulko, Michal wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > One of our priority goals for Liberty was the adoption of > > oslo.versionedobjects in order for Cinder to achieve ability to

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 08:47 -0700, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Well great! > > When is that going to be accessible :-P > > Dulko, Michal wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 10:58 -0700, Joshua Harlow wrote: > >> Just a related thought/question. It really seems we (as a

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 10:58 -0700, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Just a related thought/question. It really seems we (as a community) > need some kind of scale testing ground. Internally at yahoo we were/are > going to use a 200 hypervisor cluster for some of this and then expand > that into 200 * X

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 10:13 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: > Zookeeper sits in a very different space from Cassandra. I have had good > success with it on OpenJDK as well. > > That said, we need to maybe go through some feature/risk matrices and > compare to etcd and Consul (this might be good to do

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Google Hangout recording of volume manger locks

On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 11:01 -0700, Walter A. Boring IV wrote: > Hello folks, >I just wanted to post up the YouTube link for the video hangout that > the Cinder team just had. > > We had a good discussion about the local file locks in the volume > manager and how it affects the interaction >

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Convergence: Detecting and handling worker failures

On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 02:29 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Anant Patil's message of 2015-09-30 00:10:52 -0700: > > Hi, > > > > One of remaining items in convergence is detecting and handling engine > > (the engine worker) failures, and here are my thoughts. > > > > Background: Since

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Servicegroup refactoring for the Control Plane - Mitaka

On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 11:11 -0700, Vilobh Meshram wrote: > Accepted in Liberty [1] [2] : > [1] Services information be stored in respective backend configured > by CONF.servicegroup_driver and all the interfaces which plan to > access service information go through servicegroup layer. > [2] Add

Re: [openstack-dev] Pycharm License for OpenStack developers

> From: Kekane, Abhishek [mailto:abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 11:20 AM > Hi Devs, > > > > I am using Pycharm for development and current license is about to expire. > > Please let me know if anyone has a new license key for the same. > > > > Thank you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder]Behavior when one cinder-volume service is down

> From: Eduard Matei [mailto:eduard.ma...@cloudfounders.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 4:54 PM > > Hi, > > Let me see if i got this: > - running 3 (multiple) c-vols won't automatically give you failover > - each c-vol is "master" of a certain number of volumes > -- if the c-vol is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder]Behavior when one cinder-volume service is down

> From: Eduard Matei [mailto:eduard.ma...@cloudfounders.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 4:04 PM > > Hi, > > This all started when we were testing Evacuate with our storage driver. > We thought we found a bug > (https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1491276) then Scott replied that > we

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

> -Original Message- > From: Mike Perez [mailto:thin...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 6:16 PM > > Hello all, > > I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Each cycle I ran was > for a > reason [1][2], and the Cinder team should feel proud of our >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] Cinder and Nova availability zones

From: Ben Swartzlander [mailto:b...@swartzlander.org] Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 8:11 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) On 08/27/2015 10:43 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: Hi, Looks like we need to be able to set AZ per backend. What do

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] [Nova] [Cinder] Need to add selection of availability zone for new volume

Hi, If I recall correctly your Horizon-based solution won't be possible, because of how Nova's code works internally - it just passes Nova's AZ to Cinder API, without allowing to overwrite it. We're discussing this particular issue in another ML thread

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] Cinder and Nova availability zones

From: Duncan Thomas [mailto:duncan.tho...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 2:31 PM Except your failure domain includes the cinder volume service, independent of the resiliency of you backend, so if they're all on one node then you don't really have availability zones. I have

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] Cinder and Nova availability zones

...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Dulko, Michal michal.du...@intel.com mailto:michal.du...@intel.com wrote: Hi, In Kilo cycle [1] was merged. It started passing AZ of a booted VM to Cinder to make volumes appear in the same AZ

Re: [openstack-dev] [grenade][cinder] Updates of rootwrap filters

-Original Message- From: Eric Harney [mailto:ehar...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 5:15 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [grenade][cinder] Updates of rootwrap filters On 08/26/2015 09:57 AM, Dulko

[openstack-dev] [grenade][cinder] Updates of rootwrap filters

Hi, Recently when working on a simple bug [1] I've run into a need to change rootwrap filters rules for a few commands. After sending fix to Gerrit [2] it turns out that when testing the upgraded cloud grenade haven't copied my updated volume.filters file, and therefore failed the check. I

[openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] Cinder and Nova availability zones

Hi, In Kilo cycle [1] was merged. It started passing AZ of a booted VM to Cinder to make volumes appear in the same AZ as VM. This is certainly a good approach, but I wonder how to deal with an use case when administrator cares about AZ of a compute node of the VM, but wants to ignore AZ of

Re: [openstack-dev] How should we expose host capabilities to the scheduler

-Original Message- From: Dugger, Donald D [mailto:donald.d.dug...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 7:40 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] How should we expose host capabilities to the scheduler Without going into

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [Taskflow]Review help to cinder bp:Implement function to manage/unmanage snapshots

-06-02 17:45 GMT+08:00 Dulko, Michal michal.du...@intel.commailto:michal.du...@intel.com: Right now we’re working on refactoring current TaskFlow implementations in Cinder to make them more readable and clean. Then we’ll be able to decide if we want to get more TaskFlow into Cinder or step back

Re: [openstack-dev] Why doesn't Gerrit email me?

I'm also experiencing some difficulties with Gerrit email notifications. Around the time Kilo was released it became unreliable. Some notifications are coming after few days, some of them instantly. In particular I'm often receiving comments on a patch in invalid order. -Original

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][oslo] Locks for create from volume/snapshot

: Monday, June 29, 2015 2:46 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][oslo] Locks for create from volume/snapshot On 29 June 2015 at 15:23, Dulko, Michal michal.du...@intel.commailto:michal.du...@intel.com wrote: There’s also some

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][oslo] Locks for create from volume/snapshot

There’s also some similar situations when we actually don’t lock on resources. For example – a cgsnapshot may get deleted while creating a consistencygroup from it. From my perspective it seems best to have atomic state changes and state-based exclusion in API. We would need some kind of

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to properly detect and fence a compromised host (and why I dislike TrustedFilter)

TrustedFilter) On 24 June 2015 at 09:35, Dulko, Michal michal.du...@intel.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Sylvain Bauza [mailto:sba...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 9:39 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to properly detect and fence a compromised host (and why I dislike TrustedFilter)

-Original Message- From: Sylvain Bauza [mailto:sba...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 9:39 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to properly detect and fence a compromised host (and why I dislike

Re: [openstack-dev] [taskflow] Returning information from reverted flow

-Original Message- From: Joshua Harlow [mailto:harlo...@outlook.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 4:52 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [taskflow] Returning information from reverted flow Dulko, Michal wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [taskflow] Returning information from reverted flow

-Original Message- From: Joshua Harlow [mailto:harlo...@outlook.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 5:49 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [taskflow] Returning information from reverted flow Dulko, Michal wrote: Hi

[openstack-dev] [taskflow] Returning information from reverted flow

Hi, In Cinder we had merged a complicated piece of code[1] to be able to return something from flow that was reverted. Basically outside we needed an information if volume was rescheduled or not. Right now this is done by injecting information needed into exception thrown from the flow.

Re: [openstack-dev] Looking for help getting git-review to work over https

In our environment we're using SOCKS proxy to bypass firewall. Maybe it's an option for you? I just execute tsocks git-review instead of plain git-review and it seem to work. I've just tried solution you've mentioned and it doesn't help in my case. -Original Message- From: KARR,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [Taskflow]Review help to cinder bp:Implement function to manage/unmanage snapshots

Right now we’re working on refactoring current TaskFlow implementations in Cinder to make them more readable and clean. Then we’ll be able to decide if we want to get more TaskFlow into Cinder or step back from using it. Deadline for refactoring work is around 1 of July. Here’s related patch

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [cinder] API service in service group API

: [openstack-dev] [nova] [cinder] API service in service group API In the case of cinder, there is a proposal to add it in, since it makes some of the versioning work easier On 8 May 2015 15:08, Dulko, Michal michal.du...@intel.com wrote: Hi, I wonder why nova-api or cinder-api aren't present service group

[openstack-dev] [nova] [cinder] API service in service group API

Hi, I wonder why nova-api or cinder-api aren't present service group API of each project: mdulko:devstack/ (master) $ cinder service-list +--+---+--+-+---++-+ | Binary |

Re: [openstack-dev] Module_six_moves_urllib_parse error

Normally “apt-get remove python-six” helps. From: Jordan Pittier [mailto:jordan.pitt...@scality.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 12:08 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Module_six_moves_urllib_parse error Hi You probably have

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] HA issues

- From: John Griffith [mailto:john.griffi...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 11:28 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] HA issues On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Dulko, Michal michal.du...@intel.com wrote: Hi all

[openstack-dev] [cinder] HA issues

Hi all! At the summit during crossproject HA session there were multiple Cinder issues mentioned. These can be found in this etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-crossproject-ha-integration Is there any ongoing effort to fix these issues? Is there an idea how to approach any of