Re: [openstack-dev] request-id in API response

On Dec 6, 2013, at 1:09 AM, John Dickinson wrote: > > On Dec 5, 2013, at 1:36 AM, Maru Newby wrote: > >> >> On Dec 3, 2013, at 12:18 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 7:04 PM, John Dickinson wrote: >>> Just to add to the story, Swift uses "X-Trans-Id" and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Unicode strings in Python3

On 05.12.2013 20:42, Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote: > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Christopher Armstrong < > chris.armstr...@rackspace.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:26 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Dec 04 2013, Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote: >>> Quick summary: you can't

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] DHCP Agent Reliability

On Dec 5, 2013, at 5:21 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:37:19PM +0900, > Maru Newby wrote: > >> In the current architecture, the Neutron service handles RPC and WSGI with a >> single process and is prone to being overloaded such that agent heartbeats >> can be delayed

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] functional (aka integration) gate testing

On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote: > We are going to make integration testing gate scheme for Ironic and we've > investigated several cases which are actual for TripleO. It's great to see more work here, thanks! > 1) https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-test-cluster >

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

Jay, I don't see reduction. I count -Glance and +Murano in your email, which is net zero addition of projects I think. Did I miss something? Template catalog functionality could go into Heat in the short term with no new project additions. It could be built in a way that it would be easy to br

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Incubation Request for Barbican

Hello folks, Just an FYI that I've submitted a pull request [1] to replace Celery with oslo.messaging. I've tagged it as a work in progress per this note: "Please review this CR, which replaces Celery with oslo.messaging components. I've verified that this works in my local environment, but I

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] only one subnet_id is allowed behind a router for vpnservice object

ok, My pleasure to help, I created a bp for it: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/vpn-multiple-subnet On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote: > Hi Yong > > Yes, to support multiple subnet is on the roadmap. > I'll definitely welcome your help :P > > 2013/12/5 Yongsheng Go

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] only one subnet_id is allowed behind a router for vpnservice object

Hi Yong Yes, to support multiple subnet is on the roadmap. I'll definitely welcome your help :P 2013/12/5 Yongsheng Gong : > I think we should allow more than subnet_id in one vpnservice object. > but the model below limits only one subnet_id is used. > https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/m

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystoneclient] [Keystone] [Solum] Last released version of keystoneclient does not work with python33

Hi Adrian, I was going to say exactly what Jamie said (and that Jamie and Dolph had some conversations with the guy about the py3k support and the pending pull request for it).  Let me know if you want/need any other voices in communicating with the guy. Cheers, Morgan On December 5, 2013 at 0

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

On 12/05/2013 04:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Andrew Plunk's message of 2013-12-05 12:42:49 -0800: Excerpts from Randall Burt's message of 2013-12-05 09:05:44 -0800: On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2013-12-04 17:54:45 -0800

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Stack convergence first steps

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Randall Burt wrote: > On Dec 5, 2013, at 6:25 PM, Christopher Armstrong < > chris.armstr...@rackspace.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Anderson Mesquita < > anderson...@thoughtworks.com> wrote: > >> Hey stackers, >> >> We've been working towards

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do we have some guidelines for mock, stub, mox when writing unit test?

On 12/04/2013 12:10 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 12/04/2013 11:16 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote: Resurrecting this thread because of an interesting review that came up yesterday [1]. It seems that our lack of a firm decision on what to do with the mocking framework has left people confused. In hope

[openstack-dev] [neutron] only one subnet_id is allowed behind a router for vpnservice object

I think we should allow more than subnet_id in one vpnservice object. but the model below limits only one subnet_id is used. https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/extensions/vpnaas.py RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_MAP = { 'vpnservices': { 'id': {'allow_post': False, 'allow_put'

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Incubation Request for Barbican

On 12/06/2013 01:53 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 23:37 +, Douglas Mendizabal wrote: >>> >>> I agree that this is concerning. And that what's concerning isn't so >>> much that the project did something different, but rather that choice >>> was apparently made because the

[openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Icehouse Requirements

Hey all, I've attempted to spin out the requirements behind Jarda's excellent wireframes (http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-December/020944.html). Hopefully this can add some perspective on both the wireframes and the needed changes to the tuskar-api. All comments are welc

[openstack-dev] [openstack][tempest] keystoneclient API tests

I thought I'd get started looking at how we could get some python-keystoneclient testing into tempest. Unfortunately I missed the summit meeting about this so maybe this was discussed, but I don't see any details mentioned on the etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-summit-qa-keyston

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Stack convergence first steps

On Dec 5, 2013, at 6:25 PM, Christopher Armstrong mailto:chris.armstr...@rackspace.com>> wrote: On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Anderson Mesquita mailto:anderson...@thoughtworks.com>> wrote: Hey stackers, We've been working towards making stack convergence (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/he

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Heater Proposal

Hi Randall, Thank you for your feedback here. Let me reply to your questions: Q: Do you mean to imply that a repository of orchestration templates is a bad fit for the orchestration program? A: Yes. Its the same situation as we have with Glance. Glance is a repository of images for Nova but it i

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][TripleO] Nested resources

I think the security issue can be handled by not actually giving the underlying resource to the user in the first place. So, for example, if I wanted a bare metal node's worth of resource for my own containering, I'd ask for a bare metal node and use a "blessed" image that contains docker+nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

On 05/12/13 11:35 -0500, James Slagle wrote: On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2013-12-04 17:54:45 -0800: Why not just use glance? I've asked that question a few times, and I think I can collate the responses I've received below. I t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Subteam meeting & agenda for Dec 5 2013 2100UTC

Transcript: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ipv6/2013/neutron_ipv6.2013-12-05-21.03.html -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-d

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Heat API v2 - Removal of template_url?

On 05/12/13 17:00 +, Steven Hardy wrote: On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:11:37PM +, ELISHA, Moshe (Moshe) wrote: Hey, I really liked the v2 Heat API (as proposed in Create a new v2 Heat API) and I think it makes a lot of sense. One of the

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate / Check jobs fail fast mode - don't start tempest until docs/pep8/unittests pass?

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Peter Portante >> wrote: >> > Has anybody considered changing how check and gate jobs work such that >> > the tempest and grenade checks only run on

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Stack convergence first steps

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Anderson Mesquita < anderson...@thoughtworks.com> wrote: > Hey stackers, > > We've been working towards making stack convergence ( > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/stack-convergence) one step > closer to being ready at a time. After the first patch was

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate / Check jobs fail fast mode - don't start tempest until docs/pep8/unittests pass?

I like this idea. Michael On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Peter Portante wrote: > Has anybody considered changing how check and gate jobs work such that > the tempest and grenade checks only run once the docs/pep8/unittests > jobs all succeed? > > It seems like they complete so much quicker that

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Incubation Request for Barbican

On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 23:37 +, Douglas Mendizabal wrote: > > > >I agree that this is concerning. And that what's concerning isn't so > >much that the project did something different, but rather that choice > >was apparently made because the project thought it was perfectly fine > >for them to i

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Incubation Request for Barbican

> >I agree that this is concerning. And that what's concerning isn't so >much that the project did something different, but rather that choice >was apparently made because the project thought it was perfectly fine >for them to ignore what other OpenStack projects do and go off and do >its own thin

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Randall Burt wrote: > On Dec 5, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Steve Baker > wrote: > > On 12/06/2013 10:46 AM, Mark Washenberger wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya > wrote: > >> >> On Dec 5, 2013, at 12:42 PM, Andrew Plunk >> wrote: >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate / Check jobs fail fast mode - don't start tempest until docs/pep8/unittests pass?

On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote: > Why developers need to wait for other jobs? Zuul shows current progress > well. > > They don't need to wait, but it would free up resources for other jobs that might pass to get tested earlier. > > On Friday, December 6, 2013, Peter Portan

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate / Check jobs fail fast mode - don't start tempest until docs/pep8/unittests pass?

On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Peter Portante > wrote: > > Has anybody considered changing how check and gate jobs work such that > > the tempest and grenade checks only run once the docs/pep8/unittests > > jobs all succeed? > > > > It seems

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Core reviewer update Dec

On 5 December 2013 21:09, Ladislav Smola wrote: > Hello, > > so what is the plan? Tuskar-UI stays in tripleo until tripleo is part of the > integrated release? > > Thanks, > Ladislav There isn't a plan yet, it's just discussion so far. I don't have a strong feeling of consensus. Lets discuss it m

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Core reviewer update Dec

On 5 December 2013 09:12, Keith Basil wrote: >> This sounds reasonable to me. The code base for TuskarUI is building on >> Horizon and we are planning on integrating TuskarUI into Horizon once >> TripleO is part of the integrated release. The review skills and focus for >> TuskarUI is certai

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] python 2.6 gate-nova-python26 failing

On 2013-12-05 14:06:53 +0530 (+0530), Rohan Kanade wrote: > Hey guys, i have odd situation for my review https:// > review.openstack.org/#/c/59860/, all python 2.6 unit tests are > failing, but all python 2.7 pass. Seems to be some issue on the > CI side. Just to follow up (so it doesn't look like

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

On Dec 5, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Steve Baker mailto:sba...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 12/06/2013 10:46 AM, Mark Washenberger wrote: On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Dec 5, 2013, at 12:42 PM, Andrew Plunk mailto:andrew.pl...@rackspace.com>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Heater Proposal

On Dec 5, 2013, at 4:08 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov mailto:gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com>> wrote: Hi, I am really glad to see the line of thinking close to what we at Murano see as a right direction for OpenStack development. This is a good initiative which potentially will be useful for other p

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate / Check jobs fail fast mode - don't start tempest until docs/pep8/unittests pass?

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Peter Portante wrote: > Has anybody considered changing how check and gate jobs work such that > the tempest and grenade checks only run once the docs/pep8/unittests > jobs all succeed? > > It seems like they complete so much quicker that folks can fix those > bugs

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] UI Wireframes - close to implementation start

On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: > I am sorry for mistake in tag - fixed in this reply and keeping the original > text below. > > On 2013/03/12 10:25, Jaromir Coufal wrote: > > Hey folks, > > I opened 2 issues on UX discussion forum with TripleO UI topics: > > Resource Managem

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Incubation Request for Barbican

On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 16:43 +, Jarret Raim wrote: > > The API and developer documentation is at > >http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslo.messaging/ > > This is great, thanks for the link. Would there be any objections to > adding this to the github repo and the openstack wiki pages? I spent

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Incubation Request for Barbican

On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 17:33 -0500, Monty Taylor wrote: > > On 12/02/2013 05:09 PM, Jarret Raim wrote: ... > >> I'd like to address the use of Celery. > >> > >> WTF > >> > >> Barbican has been around for 9 months, which means that it does not > >> predate the work that has become oslo.messaging. It

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Incubation Request for Barbican

On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 22:09 +, Jarret Raim wrote: > It looks like the project was moved to its own repo in April. However, I > can¹t seem to find the docs anywhere? The only thing I see is a design doc > here [1]. Are there plans for it to be packaged and put into Pypi? > ... > > [1] https:/

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] [Solum] Heater Proposal

On Dec 5, 2013, at 1:50 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Tim Schnell's message of 2013-12-05 13:07:17 -0800: >> On 12/5/13 12:17 PM, "Clint Byrum" wrote: >> >>> Excerpts from Tim Schnell's message of 2013-12-05 09:49:03 -0800: On 12/5/13 11:33 AM, "Randall Burt" wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

On 12/06/2013 10:46 AM, Mark Washenberger wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya > mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Dec 5, 2013, at 12:42 PM, Andrew Plunk > mailto:andrew.pl...@rackspace.com>> > wrote: > > >> Excerpts from Randall Burt's mess

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate / Check jobs fail fast mode - don't start tempest until docs/pep8/unittests pass?

Why developers need to wait for other jobs? Zuul shows current progress well. On Friday, December 6, 2013, Peter Portante wrote: > Has anybody considered changing how check and gate jobs work such that > the tempest and grenade checks only run once the docs/pep8/unittests > jobs all succeed? > >

[openstack-dev] Gate / Check jobs fail fast mode - don't start tempest until docs/pep8/unittests pass?

Has anybody considered changing how check and gate jobs work such that the tempest and grenade checks only run once the docs/pep8/unittests jobs all succeed? It seems like they complete so much quicker that folks can fix those bugs before having to wait hours for the other jobs. Thoughts, concern

Re: [openstack-dev] [UX] Topics Summary

On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 09:36 +0100, Jaromir Coufal wrote: > Hey OpenStackers, > > based on the latest discussions, it was asked if we can try to post > regular updates of what is happening in our community (mostly on Askbot > forum: http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com). > > In this e-mail, I'd li

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Heater Proposal

Hi, I am really glad to see the line of thinking close to what we at Murano see as a right direction for OpenStack development. This is a good initiative which potentially will be useful for other projects. We have very similar idea about repository in Murano project and we even implemented the f

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][TripleO] Nested resources

Hi Kevin, On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 12:39 -0800, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > Hi all, > > I just want to run a crazy idea up the flag pole. TripleO has the > concept of an under and over cloud. In starting to experiment with > Docker, I see a pattern start to emerge. > > * As a User, I may want to allocat

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

Excerpts from Tim Schnell's message of 2013-12-05 13:07:17 -0800: > On 12/5/13 12:17 PM, "Clint Byrum" wrote: > > >Excerpts from Tim Schnell's message of 2013-12-05 09:49:03 -0800: > >> > >> On 12/5/13 11:33 AM, "Randall Burt" wrote: > >> > >> >On Dec 5, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Clint Byrum > >> >

[openstack-dev] [heat] Stack convergence first steps

Hey stackers, We've been working towards making stack convergence ( https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/stack-convergence) one step closer to being ready at a time. After the first patch was submitted we got positive feedback on it as well as some good suggestions as to how to move it for

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: > > On Dec 5, 2013, at 12:42 PM, Andrew Plunk > wrote: > > >> Excerpts from Randall Burt's message of 2013-12-05 09:05:44 -0800: > >>> On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Clint Byrum > >>> wrote: > >>> > Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] maintenance policy for code graduating from the incubator

On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 11:00 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: > I have updated the Oslo wiki page with these details and would appreciate > feedback on the wording used there. > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo#Graduation Thanks Doug, that sounds perfect to me. Mark. _

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

The original intention was to propose the Heater functionality as part of Heat. I would just like to clarify that having Heater as a separate project is not because of the impact of the gerrit reviews. The proposal for a separate Core team or sub-project team was to solve the impact on reviews.

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

Excerpts from Andrew Plunk's message of 2013-12-05 12:42:49 -0800: > >Excerpts from Randall Burt's message of 2013-12-05 09:05:44 -0800: > >> On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Clint Byrum > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2013-12-04 17:54:45 -0800: > >> >> Why not just us

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

On 12/5/13 12:17 PM, "Clint Byrum" wrote: >Excerpts from Tim Schnell's message of 2013-12-05 09:49:03 -0800: >> >> On 12/5/13 11:33 AM, "Randall Burt" wrote: >> >> >On Dec 5, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Clint Byrum >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2013-12-05 08:35:12 -08

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

On Dec 5, 2013, at 12:42 PM, Andrew Plunk wrote: >> Excerpts from Randall Burt's message of 2013-12-05 09:05:44 -0800: >>> On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Clint Byrum >>> wrote: >>> Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2013-12-04 17:54:45 -0800: > Why not just use glance? >

[openstack-dev] [savanna] icehouse-1 development milestone available

Hi folks, The first dev milestone of Icehouse cycle is now available for Savanna. Here is a full list of new features and fixed bugs, as well as tarball downloads: https://launchpad.net/savanna/icehouse/icehouse-1 There are 7 blueprints implemented and 18 bugs fixed during the milestone. It inc

[openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

>Excerpts from Randall Burt's message of 2013-12-05 09:05:44 -0800: >> On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Clint Byrum >> wrote: >> >> > Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2013-12-04 17:54:45 -0800: >> >> Why not just use glance? >> >> >> > >> > I've asked that question a few times, and I think I c

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] UI Wireframes - close to implementation start

On 6 December 2013 08:32, Matt Wagner wrote: > On Tue Dec 3 06:53:04 2013, Jaromir Coufal wrote: > I think it would be very fair to say that's just something we're not > focusing on at this point, and that to start out we're just going to > handle the simple case of wanting to install many nodes

[openstack-dev] [savanna] team meeting minutes Dec 5

Thanks everyone who have joined Savanna meeting. Here are the logs from the meeting: Minutes: savanna.2013-12-05-18.05.html Log: savanna.2013-12-05-18.05.log.html

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

Completely agree with Brad... a new project for this is not what is needed. >From an operator's point of view, it is a REAL, REAL, REAL pain to be >configuring yet another project, yet another set of Puppet/Chef recipes, >additional monitoring, service nodes, new databases, more documentation,

[openstack-dev] [glance] Action-Requested: In progress bugs/blueprints/abandoned patches

Hey Glance folks, It seems there are a fairly large number of abandoned patches that are still valuable. Some were auto-abandoned by jenkins without negative reviews and others were -2'd for the Havana feature freeze then abandoned and forgotten. I want to ask everyone to look over their aband

[openstack-dev] [nova] ExtraSpecs format bug

Hi! i am working on the Horizon 'side' of https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1256119 , where basically if you create a ExtraSpec key containing '/', then it cannot be deleted anymore. Is there any restriction about this? Shall the format of the keys be limited to some specific format or any

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Moving the QA meeting time

On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 04:04:22PM -0500, Matthew Treinish wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm looking at changing our weekly QA meeting time to make it more globally > attendable. Right now the current time of 17:00 UTC doesn't really work for > people who live in Asia Pacific timezones. (which include

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] UI Wireframes - close to implementation start

On Tue Dec 3 06:53:04 2013, Jaromir Coufal wrote: > Wireframes walkthrough: https://www.youtube.com/enhance?v=oRtL3aCuEEc > >> On 2013/03/12 10:25, Jaromir Coufal wrote: >>> Hey folks, >>> >>> I opened 2 issues on UX discussion forum with TripleO UI topics: Hey Jarda, thanks for sharing these! So

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Subteam meeting & agenda for Dec 5 2013 2100UTC

Agenda has been posted - look forward to speaking to you all soon. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-IPv6-Subteam -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mail

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vote required for certificate as first-class citizen - SSL Termination (Revised)

Correct. Evgeny will update the WIKI accordingly. We will add a flag in the SSL Certificate to allow specifying that the private key can't be persisted. And in this case, the private key could be passed when associating the cert_id with the VIP. Regards, -Sam. -Original Message

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

Lots of good discussion on this topic. One thing I would like to point out is that we get feedback that OpenStack has too many projects as it is and customers get confused on how much of OpenStack they need to install. So in the spirit of trying to help insure OpenStack does not continue to r

[openstack-dev] [barbican] Barbican 2014.1.b1 ("Icehouse") is released

Hello everyone, It is my pleasure to announce the first milestone delivery for the OpenStack Icehouse series. Information on the milestone and its associated tarball are available at: https://launchpad.net/barbican/+milestone/icehouse-1 With this milestone, 2 blueprints have been implemented a

Re: [openstack-dev] Performance Regression in Neutron/Havana compared to Quantum/Grizzly

Hello Peter, Thanks for the info. I will do the tests with your code changes. What surprises me is, When I did the tests in Grizzly, up to 210 instances could get an IP during the first boot. Once we cross 210 active instances, during the next batch some instances could not get IP. As the num

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Moving the QA meeting time

Hey, guys. We've got a team in China that is focused mainly on Test and at least one or two would like to attend the meetings. 22:00 UTC is a bit early for them so I think it would be better to alternate to get reasonable participation. The team wants to get more involved in the test effort an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Interfaces file format, was [Tempest] Need to prepare the IPv6 environment for static IPv6 injection test case

Hi Ian, The rendered network template was a legacy item that got stuck onto the config drive so we could remove file injection. It is not intended that this is the correct way to do net config. We have intended in the past to put a generic form of network info into the metadata service and conf

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Meeting Tuesday December 3rd at 19:00 UTC

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph wrote: > The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly > meeting tomorrow, Tuesday December 3rd, at 19:00 UTC in > #openstack-meeting Meeting minutes and logs: Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2013

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

Excerpts from Randall Burt's message of 2013-12-05 09:05:44 -0800: > On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Clint Byrum > wrote: > > > Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2013-12-04 17:54:45 -0800: > >> Why not just use glance? > >> > > > > I've asked that question a few times, and I think I can col

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition

All, I have captured almost all the email conversation (between Arvind, David and Adam) in the etherpad (line #54 - 126 ) and moved old conversation under line #130. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition In the beginning (line # 1 to 51), I have captured where we are

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vote required for certificate as first-class citizen - SSL Termination (Revised)

Hi folks OK, It looks like we get consensus on separate resource" way. Best Nachi 2013/12/5 Eugene Nikanorov : > Hi, > > My vote is for separate resource (e.g. 'New Model'). Also I'd like to see > certificate handling as a separate extension/db mixing(in fact, persistence > driver) similar to se

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

Excerpts from Tim Schnell's message of 2013-12-05 09:49:03 -0800: > > On 12/5/13 11:33 AM, "Randall Burt" wrote: > > >On Dec 5, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Clint Byrum > > wrote: > > > >> Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2013-12-05 08:35:12 -0800: > >>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Clint Byru

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

My 2 cents. Glance currently deals with single file images. A user is going to want the heat repo to operate at a "stack" level. IE, I want to launch stack "foo". For all but the most trivial cases, a stack is made up of more then one template. These templates should be versioned as set (stack)

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

On 12/5/13 11:33 AM, "Randall Burt" wrote: >On Dec 5, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Clint Byrum > wrote: > >> Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2013-12-05 08:35:12 -0800: >>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2013-12-04 17:54:45 -0800:

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

On Dec 5, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2013-12-05 08:35:12 -0800: >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: >>> Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2013-12-04 17:54:45 -0800: Why not just use glance? >>> >>> I've as

Re: [openstack-dev] Performance Regression in Neutron/Havana compared to Quantum/Grizzly

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Nathani, Sreedhar (APS) wrote: > Hello Marun, > > > > Please find the details about my setup and tests which i have done so far > > > > Setup > > - One Physical Box with 16c, 256G memory. 2 VMs created on this Box - One > for Controller and One for Network Node >

Re: [openstack-dev] creating a default for oslo config variables within a project?

Excerpts from Julien Danjou's message of 2013-12-05 01:22:00 -0800: > On Wed, Dec 04 2013, Sean Dague wrote: > > > Honestly, I'd love us to be clever and figure out a not dangerous way > > through this, even if unwise (where we can yell at the user in the LOGs > > loudly, and fail them in J if loc

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2013-12-05 08:35:12 -0800: > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2013-12-04 17:54:45 -0800: > >> Why not just use glance? > >> > > > > I've asked that question a few times, and I think I can collate

[openstack-dev] [savanna] team meeting Nov 5

Hi folks, We'll be having the Savanna team meeting as usual in #openstack-meeting-alt channel. Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SavannaAgenda#Agenda_for_December.2C_5 http://www.timeanddate.com/worl

[openstack-dev] [Barbican] IRC Meeting Today at 2 Central (2000 UTC)

Barbican is having our official IRC meeting in #openstack-meeting-alt today at 2 central or 2000 UTC. The main topic of conversation will be the tasks / comments that came up from our incubation request. We welcome anyone with additional questions or comments to come join us. Thanks, Jarret Ra

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2013-12-04 17:54:45 -0800: >> Why not just use glance? >> > > I've asked that question a few times, and I think I can collate the > responses I've received below. I think enhancing glance to do these > th

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Heat API v2 - Removal of template_url?

On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:11:37PM +, ELISHA, Moshe (Moshe) wrote: > Hey, > > I really liked the v2 Heat API (as proposed in Create a new v2 Heat > API) and I think it makes > a lot of sense. > > One of the proposed changes is to "Remove te

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron Tempest code sprint - 2nd week of January, Montreal, QC, Canada

Dinner plans Anita tricked me into volunteering to be responsible for dinner arrangements during the sprint. :) My suggestion is to get away from our keyboards in the evenings and eat at a restaurant together. I look forward to socializing with fellow Openstack developers in a less code-centric e

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Unicode strings in Python3

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Christopher Armstrong < chris.armstr...@rackspace.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:26 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 04 2013, Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote: >> >> > Quick summary: you can't use unicode() function and u' ' strings in >> Pyhton3. >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2013-12-04 17:54:45 -0800: >> Why not just use glance? >> > > I've asked that question a few times, and I think I can collate the > responses I've received below. I think enhancing glance to do these > th

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Unicode strings in Python3

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:26 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04 2013, Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote: > > > Quick summary: you can't use unicode() function and u' ' strings in > Pyhton3. > > Not that it's advised, but you can use u' ' back again with Python 3.3. > > And this is a very useful f

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Heat API v2 - Removal of template_url?

On 05/12/13 16:11, ELISHA, Moshe (Moshe) wrote: Hey, I really liked the v2 Heat API (as proposed in Create a new v2 Heat API ) and I think it makes a lot of sense. One of the proposed changes is to “Remove template_url from the request POST”, s

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition

Hi David, Let me capture these details in ether pad. I will drop an email after adding these details in etherpad. Thanks, Arvind -Original Message- From: David Chadwick [mailto:d.w.chadw...@kent.ac.uk] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 4:15 AM To: Tiwari, Arvind; Adam Young; OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [heat] Heat API v2 - Removal of template_url?

Hey, I really liked the v2 Heat API (as proposed in Create a new v2 Heat API) and I think it makes a lot of sense. One of the proposed changes is to "Remove template_url from the request POST", so the template will be passed using the "templat

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [glance] Heater Proposal

Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2013-12-04 17:54:45 -0800: > Why not just use glance? > I've asked that question a few times, and I think I can collate the responses I've received below. I think enhancing glance to do these things is on the table: 1. Glance is for big blobs of data not t

Re: [openstack-dev] request-id in API response

On Dec 5, 2013, at 1:36 AM, Maru Newby wrote: > > On Dec 3, 2013, at 12:18 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 7:04 PM, John Dickinson wrote: >> Just to add to the story, Swift uses "X-Trans-Id" and generates it in the >> outer-most "catch_errors" middleware. >> >

[openstack-dev] [Rally] Project structure (organization) update

Hi Stackers, One of the major goals of the Rally Team is to make process of "joining Rally team" simple as much as possible. It means not just to be able to get merged your patches. It means to be totally involved in Rally team and fully understand what is happing in project and what are our goal

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Webex Recording of IPv6 / Neutron Sync-up

Hi, Jeremy: Thank you very much for your kind words! I saw you many times before in the meetup, but didn’t get a chance to talk to you. Will grab your brain next time. :) For other stackers who also feel interested in last night presentation, here is the link to the Webex recording: https://c

Re: [openstack-dev] Icehouse-1 milestone candidates available

It was created for Savanna too. During the icehouse-1 milestone we implemented 7 blueprints and fixed 18 bugs -https://launchpad.net/savanna/+milestone/icehouse-1 So, it’s time to test milestone-proposed branch - https://github.com/openstack/savanna/tree/milestone-proposed Tarballs available here

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tempest] [qa] Which is the best way for skipping tests?

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 12/04/2013 06:59 PM, Brant Knudson wrote: > > > > In Keystone, we've got some tests that "raise self.skipTest('...')" in > > the test class setUp() method (not setUpClass). My testing shows that if > > there's several tests in the class then

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] capturing build details in images

On 12/05/2013 08:38 AM, James Slagle wrote: On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Robert Collins wrote: This is a follow up to https://review.openstack.org/59621 to get broader discussion.. So at the moment we capture a bunch of details in the image - what parameters the image was built with and s

  1   2   >