Re: [openstack-dev] [CI] Jenkins jobs are not executed when setting up a new CI system.

On 07/22/2015 12:49 PM, Tang Chen wrote: Hi all, When I send a patch to gerrit, my zuul is notified, but jenkins jobs are not run. My CI always reports the following error: Merge Failed. This change was unable to be automatically merged with the current state of the repository. Please reb

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream

On 07/21/2015 09:29 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, Something we discussed at the summit was to switch the focus of tripleo's deployment method to deploy using instack using images built with tripleo-puppet-elements. Up to now all the instack work has been done downstream of tripleo as part

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] SSL feature status

Thanks Stas. My opinion is that it has to be enabled by default. I'd like product management to shine in here. Sheena? On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:06 PM Stanislaw Bogatkin wrote: > Hi, > > we have a spec that says we disable SSL by default and it was successfully > merged with that, no one was a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] SSL feature status

Hi, we have a spec that says we disable SSL by default and it was successfully merged with that, no one was against such decision. So, if we want to enable it by default now - we can. It should be done as a part of our usual process, I think - I'll create a bug for it and fix it. Current status o

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel Zabbix in deployment tasks

Hi, The code is present in 6.1 also. https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-library/blob/stable/6.1/deployment/puppet/osnailyfacter/modular/zabbix/tasks.yaml I changed the status of bug to Confirmed for 6.1 as it's 100% done. -- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser On Tue

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel Zabbix in deployment tasks

Actually, I didn't participate in that process a lot - just reviewed plugin couple of times and as I know, we had had a commits that deleted zabbix from current Fuel. There is bug about that: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1455664 There is a review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182615/ S

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel Zabbix in deployment tasks

https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-library/blob/master/deployment/puppet/osnailyfacter/modular/zabbix/tasks.yaml As far as I see, zabbix is still present in deployment graph, so it's a bug ;( -- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser _

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Question about unique default hostname for node

node-uuid is very terrible from UX perspective of view. Ask support people if they are comfortable to ssh such nodes or telling the name in phone conversation with customer. If we cannot validate FQDN of hostname I would slip this feature to next release where we can pay more attention to details.

[openstack-dev] [CI] Jenkins jobs are not executed when setting up a new CI system.

Hi all, When I send a patch to gerrit, my zuul is notified, but jenkins jobs are not run. My CI always reports the following error: Merge Failed. This change was unable to be automatically merged with the current state of the repository. Please rebase your change and upload a new patchset.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Nested Quota Driver and policy.json changes

Hi, While developing Nested Quota Driver for Cinder, when performing show/update/delete following restrictions apply :- 1. show : Only user who is admin or admin in parent or admin in root project should be able to perform show/view the quota of the leaf projects. 2. update : Only user admin in

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Nested Quota Driver and policy.json changes

Hi, While developing Nested Quota Driver for Cinder, when performing show/update/delete following restrictions apply :- 1. show : Only user who is admin or admin in parent or admin in root project should be able to perform show/view the quota of the leaf projects. 2. update : Only user admin in

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][barbican] Setting a live debug session time

So, as discussed on #irc, I plan to: 1. Check with folks who are running in a devstack environment as to where/how their barbican.conf file is configured. 2. Will keep you updated as to the progress of dogtag packaging in Ubuntu/Debian. Currently, there are a couple of bugs due to changes in tom

Re: [openstack-dev] [CI] How to set a proxy for zuul.

hi Asselin, On 07/21/2015 11:52 PM, Asselin, Ramy wrote: Tang, #openstack-meeting is for people to come together for officially scheduled meetings [1] Did you try to join the 3^rd party meeting on Monday[2]? I was chairing the meeting but did not see you. That would be a great forum to as

Re: [openstack-dev] [CI] How to set a proxy for zuul.

On 07/21/2015 11:42 PM, Asselin, Ramy wrote: Hi Tang, Please use a new thread for this new question. I'd like to keep the current thread focused on "How to set a proxy for zuul". Sure, will start a new thread if I cannot get it through. Thanks. :) Ramy *From:*Tang Chen [mailto:tangc

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more!

Why not stackforge? Thanks, Kevin From: Hayes, Graham Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 11:53:35 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more! Hi All, I have created a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Abandon changesets which hang for a while without updates

Folks, I'll push DevOps to run the script. However, what we need is to just go ahead and clean up, abandon manually what is not relevant anymore, provide comment. Please start with your patches. On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:08 PM Oleg Gelbukh wrote: > Nicely put, Doug, you gave me laughs :) > > I

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] v3 Cleanup coming

Cool! Thanks for the work! 2015-07-21 22:51 GMT+08:00 Ed Leafe : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > One of the tasks we have now that the 2.1 microversion API has become > the default is cleaning up the old references to 'v3', and moving all > the v2 code to a separate direct

[openstack-dev] [magnum][blueprint] magnum-service-list

Hi all, [special attention: Jay Lau] The bp[1] registered, asks for the following implementation - * 'magnum service-list' should be similar to 'nova service-list' * 'magnum service-list' should be moved to be ' magnum k8s-service-list'. Also similar holds true for 'pod-list'/'rc-list' As

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaasv2]How to configure lbaasv2 in devstack

Please make sure to check the previous discussion about the effort Vivek is leading [1] [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg58328.html From: "jiangshan0...@139.com" mailto:jiangshan0...@139.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] token revocation woes

Well, you might be in luck! Morgan Fainberg actually implemented an improvement that was apparently documented by Adam Young way back in March: https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1287757 There's a link to the stable/kilo backport in comment #2 - I'd be eager to hear how it performs for yo

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [VXLAN] patch to use per-VNI multicast group addresses

It is useful, yes; and posting diffs on the mailing list is not the way to get them reviewed and approved. If you can get this on gerrit it will get a proper review, and I would certainly like to see something like this incorporated. On 21 July 2015 at 15:41, John Nielsen wrote: > I may be in a

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] token revocation woes

Dolph, Excuse the delayed reply, was waiting for a brilliant solution from someone. Without one, personally I'd prefer the cronjob as it seems to be the type of thing cron was designed for. That will be a painful change as people now rely on this behavior so I don't know if its feasible. I will be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] Representing a networks connected by routers

On 21 July 2015 at 12:11, John Belamaric wrote: > Wow, a lot to digest in these threads. If I can summarize my > understanding of the two proposals. Let me know whether I get this right. > There are a couple problems that need to be solved: > > a. Scheduling based on host reachability to the s

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican : Unable to store the secret when Barbican was Integrated with SafeNet HSM

Hi John , One quick question : When barbican is integrated with HSM , we send the order request to generate symmetric key . The request would goes to HSM and would generate the symmetic key which is a secret.Then the secret is wrapped with the KEKs and then sent to Barbican. The key requested t

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [VXLAN] patch to use per-VNI multicast group addresses

I may be in a small minority since I a) use VXLAN, b) don’t hate multicast and c) use linuxbridge instead of OVS. However I thought I’d share this patch in case I’m not alone. If you assume the use of multicast, VXLAN works quite nicely to isolate L2 domains AND to prevent delivery of unwanted

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Denys Klepikov for fuel-docs core

Looks like we have a consensus, I've added Denys to the fuel-docs-core group. Congratulations Denys, please keep up the good work! On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:30 AM Mike Scherbakov wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:40 AM Miroslav Anashkin > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> -- >> >> *Kind Regards* >

[openstack-dev] [fuel][puppet] Module Sync for Murano and Sahara

I was looped into reviewing the sync commits for Murano and Sahara. Both are in terrible shape and risk feature freeze at this point. We need feed back from the authors here. What is actually required for Kilo support (if any)from the Murano and Sahara modules? What will happen if these slip the r

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Swift] Erasure coding reconstructor doesn't work

I was about to ask that very same thing and, at the same time, if you can indicate if you’ve seen errors in any logs and if so please provide those as well. I’m hoping you just didn’t delete the hashes.pkl file though ☺ -Paul From: Clay Gerrard [mailto:clay.gerr...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, Ju

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Swift] Erasure coding reconstructor doesn't work

How did you "deleted one data fragment"? Like replication the EC consistency engine uses some sub directory hashing to accelerate replication requests in a consistent system - so if you just rm a file down in an hashdir somewhere you also need to delete the hashes.pkl up in the part dir (or call t

Re: [openstack-dev] New gate blocker: 1476770

On 7/21/2015 3:24 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 7/21/2015 12:58 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Grenade is blowing up on an AttributeError in glance, just started blowing up today so it must be a new library release. Bug is tracked here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1476770 We're wai

[openstack-dev] [horizon] [stable] Freeze exception

Hello, I would like to request for a freeze exception for the following bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1475190 Here is the patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/202836/ This patch is not required in master as the network profile feature is supported in neutron for liberty releas

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Swift] Erasure coding reconstructor doesn't work

Yes, it's supposed to work, but you've run in to some errors we've been finding and fixing. Right now the top priority for the Swift dev community is to take care of the outstanding EC issues and make a release. The list of the known EC bugs right now is https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bugs?f

[openstack-dev] Barbican : Regarding the use of HMAC in HSM

Hi All , Would like to understand the usage of HMAC in HSM. From Barbican , we send the request to generate MKEK and HMAC. What is the relation between HMAC, MKEK AND KEK. would need help in understanding HMAC. -- *Thanks and Regards,* *Asha Seshagiri* _

[openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Swift] Erasure coding reconstructor doesn't work

Folks, To test the latest feature of Swift erasure coding, I followed this document ( http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/overview_erasure_code.html) to deploy a simple cluster. I used Swift 2.3.0. I am glad that operations like object PUT/GET/DELETE worked fine. I can see that objects were

Re: [openstack-dev] New gate blocker: 1476770

On 7/21/2015 12:58 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Grenade is blowing up on an AttributeError in glance, just started blowing up today so it must be a new library release. Bug is tracked here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1476770 We're waiting to see if https://review.openstack.org/#/c

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Question about unique default hostname for node

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:38 AM Fedor Zhadaev wrote: > Hi all, > > The next issue was found during implementation > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/node-naming : > > User may change node hostname to any another, including default-like > 'node-{№}', where № may be bigger than maximum

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican : Unable to store the secret when Barbican was Integrated with SafeNet HSM

Hi John , Thanks for providing the solution . Its a bug in Barbican code , it works without passing the length . I would raise the bug and fix it . root@HSM-Client bin]# python pkcs11-key-generation --library-path '/usr/lib/libCryptoki2_64.so' --passphrase 'test123' --slot-id 1 mkek --label 'an

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more!

Yup - we are waiting for the "experimental projects" spec to merge in openstack governance - we have a patch ready and waiting[1]. This is just to allow us to get moving. - 1 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/201683/ On 21/07/15 20:56, Clint Byrum wrote: > Perhaps I missed a discussion: You seem

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more!

Perhaps I missed a discussion: You seem to be doing all the things that an OpenStack project team does. Is there some reason you aren't just creating an OpenStack project team? http://governance.openstack.org/reference/new-projects-requirements.html https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/NewP

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more!

I have created a doc in ether pad to get a voting started on the project name. Please feel free to suggest names or vote on existing names. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/GSLB_project_name_vote Regards Kunal > On Jul 21, 2015, at 12:3

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more!

I forgot to add there is also an IRC channel created - #openstack-gslb I also have one item for the agenda that we should think about over the week - do we want to have a project name? If we do we should add it soon, so we can name projects/repo etc correctly. - Graham On 21/07/15 20:02, Hayes,

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more!

+1. I think the group discussion should be one of the items on the meeting agenda for next week. Regards Kunal > On Jul 21, 2015, at 12:21 PM, Susanne Balle wrote: > > correction: I think that discussing who should be in what group at next > week's meeting make sense. Susanne > > On Tue, Jul

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream

Hi All, Something we discussed at the summit was to switch the focus of tripleo's deployment method to deploy using instack using images built with tripleo-puppet-elements. Up to now all the instack work has been done downstream of tripleo as part of rdo. Having parts of our deployment stor

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more!

correction: I think that discussing who should be in what group at next week's meeting make sense. Susanne On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Susanne Balle wrote: > cool! thanks. I will request to be added to the correct groups. > > Susanne > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Hayes, Graham > wro

Re: [openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more!

cool! thanks. I will request to be added to the correct groups. Susanne On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Hayes, Graham wrote: > Hi All, > > I have created a github org and 2 repos for us to get started in. > > https://github.com/gslb/ is the org, with https://github.com/gslb/gslb > as the main

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] Representing a networks connected by routers

Wow, a lot to digest in these threads. If I can summarize my understanding of the two proposals. Let me know whether I get this right. There are a couple problems that need to be solved: a. Scheduling based on host reachability to the segments b. Floating IP functionality across the segments.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] Representing a networks connected by routers

On 21 July 2015 at 07:52, Carl Baldwin wrote: > > Now, you seem to generally be thinking in terms of the latter model, > particularly since the provider network model you're talking about fits > there. But then you say: > > Actually, both. For example, GoDaddy assigns each vm an ip from the > l

[openstack-dev] [GSLB][LBaaS] Launchpad project, git repos and more!

Hi All, I have created a github org and 2 repos for us to get started in. https://github.com/gslb/ is the org, with https://github.com/gslb/gslb as the main code repo. There is 2 "teams" (Github's name for groups) gslb-core, and gslb-admin. Core have read/write access to the repos, and admin ca

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][bp] Power Magnum to run on metal withHyper

Adrian, I definitely agree with #1 - #5. I am just trying to understand the nova virt driver for hyper approach. As Peng mentioned, hyper is a hypervisor-based substitute for container, but magnum is not making a special virt driver for container host creation (Instead, magnum leverages the exi

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] backlog of requirements changes

Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2015-07-22 03:17:53 +1200: > There seem to be quite a backlog in openstack/requirements. > > http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/requirements-reviewers-30.txt > > there are roughly 10x new changes to the number of reviews cores are > managing to do.

[openstack-dev] New gate blocker: 1476770

Grenade is blowing up on an AttributeError in glance, just started blowing up today so it must be a new library release. Bug is tracked here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1476770 -- Thanks, Matt Riedemann __

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] backlog of requirements changes

On 07/21/2015 12:01 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Count me in to, > > I can help, although not exactly sure what helping entails (requirements > reviews don't exactly feel like they are complex to really need tons of > reviews, it's not like they are some complex code algorithm that may be > buggy...

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] backlog of requirements changes

On 07/21/2015 10:17 AM, Robert Collins wrote: > There seem to be quite a backlog in openstack/requirements. > > http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/requirements-reviewers-30.txt > > there are roughly 10x new changes to the number of reviews cores are > managing to do. > > This worries me, a

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] backlog of requirements changes

On 21 July 2015 at 16:17, Robert Collins wrote: > There seem to be quite a backlog in openstack/requirements. > > http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/requirements-reviewers-30.txt > > there are roughly 10x new changes to the number of reviews cores are > managing to do. > > This worries me, a

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] backlog of requirements changes

Count me in to, I can help, although not exactly sure what helping entails (requirements reviews don't exactly feel like they are complex to really need tons of reviews, it's not like they are some complex code algorithm that may be buggy...). Robert Collins wrote: There seem to be quite a

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Service Chain project IRC meeting minutes - 07/16/2015

Hi Wei, Yes, We will have project meeting on IRC every week. I will send out an cancellation notice to the openstack-dev if a meeting will be canceled. You are welcome to join! Cathy From: Vikram Choudhary [mailto:viks...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 3:40 AM To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [CI] How to set a proxy for zuul.

Tang, #openstack-meeting is for people to come together for officially scheduled meetings [1] Did you try to join the 3rd party meeting on Monday[2]? I was chairing the meeting but did not see you. That would be a great forum to ask these questions. Otherwise, you can ask in #openstack-infra. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] weekly meeting Agenda for July 21

g/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20150721 > > See you tomorrow > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] [CI] [tempest] Tempest tests failing with SSH timeout.

Why do you want to stop those downloads? The purpose is to setup your VM so that it has the latest code in the git repos and that each project has any custom refs, such as the patch under test. Also, this is a different problem than the subject, so should be a new thread. Ramy From: Abhishek S

Re: [openstack-dev] [CI] How to set a proxy for zuul.

Hi Tang, Please use a new thread for this new question. I'd like to keep the current thread focused on "How to set a proxy for zuul". Ramy From: Tang Chen [mailto:tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 12:23 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [

[openstack-dev] [requirements] backlog of requirements changes

There seem to be quite a backlog in openstack/requirements. http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/requirements-reviewers-30.txt there are roughly 10x new changes to the number of reviews cores are managing to do. This worries me, and I'd like to help. How can I best do so? -Rob -- Robert

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] Representing a networks connected by routers

On Jul 20, 2015 4:26 PM, "Ian Wells" wrote: > > There are two routed network models: > > - I give my VM an address that bears no relation to its location and ensure the routed fabric routes packets there - this is very much the routing protocol method for doing things where I have injected a route

[openstack-dev] [nova] v3 Cleanup coming

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 One of the tasks we have now that the 2.1 microversion API has become the default is cleaning up the old references to 'v3', and moving all the v2 code to a separate directory. This is needed because the current arrangement is confusing, especially t

[openstack-dev] [security] [docs] Security Guide Freeze and RST migration

All, The OpenStack Security Guide is migrating to RST format [1] and with help from the docs team we hope to have this completed shortly. We will therefore be entering a freeze on all changes coming into the Security Guide until the migration is complete, and all future changes will be in the m

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] Representing a networks connected by routers

A few comments inline. Generally speaking the only thing I'd like to remark is that this use case makes sense independently of whether you are using overlay, or any other "SDN" solution (whatever SDN means to you). Also, please note that this thread is now split in two - there's a new branch star

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] Representing a networks connected by routers

On 21/07/15 01:47, Assaf Muller wrote: > > - Original Message - >> I'm looking for feedback from anyone interest but, in particular, I'd >> like feedback from the following people for varying perspectives: >> Mark McClain (proposed alternate), John Belamaric (IPAM), Ryan Tidwell >> (BGP), N

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] Representing a networks connected by routers

[Sorry, mistaken send as mixed format, so quoting may not have come out right. Hope this time is better...] On 20/07/15 23:27, Ian Wells wrote: > There are two routed network models: > > - I give my VM an address that bears no relation to its location and > ensure the routed fabric routes packets

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] Representing a networks connected by routers

On 20/07/15 23:27, Ian Wells wrote: There are two routed network models: - I give my VM an address that bears no relation to its location and ensure the routed fabric routes packets there - this is very much the routing protocol method for doing things where I have injected a route into the netw

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] ceph gate unstable

On 07/21/2015 04:08 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 07/21/2015 10:51 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: >> Hi, >> It seems like the gating is failing with cep tests: >> http://logs.openstack.org/29/199129/6/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-full-ceph/bfe423d/logs/testr_results.html.gz >> >> Is anyone looking into this? >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] What to do with reservation check in node update API?

On 07/21/2015 03:32 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: Hi, Another question folks: while the problem above is valid and should be solved, I was actually keeping in mind another one: https://github.com/openstack/ironic/blob/master/ironic/api/controllers/v1/node.py#L1052-L1057 This is also not retr

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] What to do with reservation check in node update API?

On 07/21/2015 03:26 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: Hi, So, it looks like the only reason we check the reservation field here is because we want to return a 409 for "node is locked" rather than a 400, right? do_node_deploy and such will raise a NodeLocked, which should do the same as this check.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] What to do with reservation check in node update API?

Hi, > > Another question folks: while the problem above is valid and should be > solved, I was actually keeping in mind another one: > https://github.com/openstack/ironic/blob/master/ironic/api/controllers/v1/node.py#L1052-L1057 > > This is also not retried, and it prevents updating during power o

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] What to do with reservation check in node update API?

Hi, > So, it looks like the only reason we check the reservation field here is > because we want to return a 409 for "node is locked" rather than a 400, > right? do_node_deploy and such will raise a NodeLocked, which should do > the same as this check. It's unclear to me why we can't just remove t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] Representing a networks connected by routers

On 20/07/15 18:36, Carl Baldwin wrote: > I'm looking for feedback from anyone interest but, in particular, I'd > like feedback from the following people for varying perspectives: > Mark McClain (proposed alternate), John Belamaric (IPAM), Ryan Tidwell > (BGP), Neil Jerram (L3 networks), Aaron Rosen

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] What to do with reservation check in node update API?

On 07/21/2015 03:01 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 02:24:14PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi folks! If you're not aware already, I'm working on solving "node is locked" problems breaking users (and tracking it at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-locking-reform). We h

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] What to do with reservation check in node update API?

On 07/21/2015 02:24 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi folks! If you're not aware already, I'm working on solving "node is locked" problems breaking users (and tracking it at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-locking-reform). We have retries in place in client, but we all agree that it's not the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] What to do with reservation check in node update API?

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 02:24:14PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi folks! > > If you're not aware already, I'm working on solving "node is locked" > problems breaking users (and tracking it at > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-locking-reform). We have retries in > place in client, but we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Question about unique default hostname for node

Hi Fedor, > Use 'node-{ID}-{#}' format, where {#} we'll chose in loop till the first > unique. I don't like this approach by many reasons. Here's some of them: * With a loop you're going to perform N SQL queries in order to check for uniqueness, and that's a bad design and it'd be better to avo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] What to do with reservation check in node update API?

I'd choose Option #2 Cheers, Serge Kovaleff http://www.mirantis.com cell: +38 (063) 83-155-70 On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi folks! > > If you're not aware already, I'm working on solving "node is locked" > problems breaking users (and tracking it at > https://ether

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Question about unique default hostname for node

Hi all, The next issue was found during implementation https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/node-naming : User may change node hostname to any another, including default-like 'node-{№}', where № may be bigger than maximum nodeID existing at that moment. Later when node with ID == № wil

[openstack-dev] [nova] [stable] Freze exception

Hello I'd like to ask for a freeze exception for the follow bug fix: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198385/ bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1443970 merged bug fix in master: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/173362/ Incorrect usage of argument 'dhcp_server' may be cause of some prob

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] What to do with reservation check in node update API?

Hi folks! If you're not aware already, I'm working on solving "node is locked" problems breaking users (and tracking it at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-locking-reform). We have retries in place in client, but we all agree that it's not the eventual solution. One of the things we'v

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable]{kilo][glance] freeze exceptions

> We have been waiting python-cinderclient stable/kilo release for couple of > weeks to be able to merge glance_store stable/kilo backports. Namigly: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/glance_store+branch:stable/kilo,n,z > > As Alan blocked them all, I’d like to ask

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][plugin] Plugin depends on another plugin

Yes, it should resolve my case and in general any case of dependency of something that is not installed. On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Vitaly Kramskikh wrote: > Daniel, > > Yes, it doesn't work in 6.1 release. My question is: are you OK if we > support your case in 7.0 using the approach I de

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Device names supplied to the boot request

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 08:12:18AM +0300, Feodor Tersin wrote: > The third reason is that at least xen supports them.I know that vdr > becomes /dev/xvdr, but:1) I believe the main aim of specifying device > name is to easy distinguish among devices. A last char is enough for > that. And xen support

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][plugin] Plugin depends on another plugin

Daniel, Yes, it doesn't work in 6.1 release. My question is: are you OK if we support your case in 7.0 using the approach I described? 2015-07-21 14:13 GMT+03:00 Daniel Depaoli : > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Vitaly Kramskikh < > vkramsk...@mirantis.com> wrote: > >> Hi, currently it's

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] The designate API service is stopped

Hi Kiall, It's a bit strange because only designate-api dies but designate-sink is also integrated with qpid and survives. These issues are a bit difficult because it is not deterministic. What I've just tested is using a local qpid instance and it looks like the designate-api is not killed any m

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][plugin] Plugin depends on another plugin

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Vitaly Kramskikh wrote: > Hi, currently it's not possible to handle cases like this. The expression > parser by default expects every key in the expression to exist, otherwise > it throws an error. But it also supports non-strict mode, in which > non-existent key

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] How should oslo.service handle SIGINT?

Elena, The cleaner output was the norm before oslo.service was merged and if there are no downsides, then we should fix oslo.service to do the same. thanks, dims On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Elena Ezhova wrote: > @Dims, > > The main advantage of having a handler is a more clean output in ca

Re: [openstack-dev] Python 3: 5 more projects with a py34 voting gate, only 4 remaing

Hi, Could you please modify the wiki page yourself to add Designate? I don't want to be the only one maintaining this wiki page ;-) https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Python3 Victor - Original Message - > From: "Kiall Mac Innes" > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Sent: Tuesday, Ju

Re: [openstack-dev] Python 3: 5 more projects with a py34 voting gate, only 4 remaing

You can (nearly) add Designate to this list :) Pradeep has been doing a great job getting the codebase py3 compatible! Thanks, Kiall On 17/07/15 12:32, Victor Stinner wrote: > Hi, > > We are close to having a voting py34 gate on all OpenStack libraries and > applications. I just made the py34 g

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] How should oslo.service handle SIGINT?

@Dims, The main advantage of having a handler is a more clean output in case a service is killed, which means there wouldn't be a stacktrace with KeyboardInterrupt exception, just messages like we have in nova now (nova "Switch to oslo.service patch" hadn't merged yet): 2015-07-21 10:46:06.765 IN

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Service Chain project IRC meeting minutes - 07/16/2015

Hi Wei, It happens every week unless cancelled by the chair. Thanks Vikram On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Damon Wang wrote: > Hi, > > Does service chaining project meeting will be held this week? I'd like to > join :-D > > Wei Wang > > 2015-07-17 2:09 GMT+08:00 Cathy Zhang : > >> Hi Everyon

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][plugin] Plugin depends on another plugin

Hi, currently it's not possible to handle cases like this. The expression parser by default expects every key in the expression to exist, otherwise it throws an error. But it also supports non-strict mode, in which non-existent keys are treated as null value. We can add support for enabling this mo

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Service Chain project IRC meeting minutes - 07/16/2015

Hi, Does service chaining project meeting will be held this week? I'd like to join :-D Wei Wang 2015-07-17 2:09 GMT+08:00 Cathy Zhang : > Hi Everyone, > > > > Thanks for joining the service chaining project meeting on 7/16/2015. > Here is the link to the meeting logs: > > http://eavesdrop.open

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] The designate API service is stopped

Inline. Thanks, Kiall On 21/07/15 09:24, Jaime Fernández wrote: > I confirm that it happened again. I started all the designate processes > and after an hour (approximately), the designate-api process died with > the same stack trace. > > Restarting the designate-api does not help because API re

Re: [openstack-dev] [CI] How to set a proxy for zuul.

Its just because what kind of file are you creating, as "touch /tmp/noop-check-communication" doesn't makes any sense to it. On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Tang Chen wrote: > > On 07/21/2015 04:05 PM, Abhishek Shrivastava wrote: > > If you want to create a new job then refer " > *dsvm-cinder-

Re: [openstack-dev] [CI] How to set a proxy for zuul.

On 07/21/2015 04:05 PM, Abhishek Shrivastava wrote: If you want to create a new job then refer "*dsvm-cinder-driver.yaml.sample*", and regarding "*noop-check-communication*" its just for testing the first time don't modify it. Well, I understand. But I don't think this little change will c

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] [CI] [tempest] Tempest tests failing with SSH timeout.

Also, can't we stop downloading all those projects and let them include them in the DevStack using the ENABLED_SERVICES parameter, like we usually do while installing devstack. On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Abhishek Shrivastava < abhis...@cloudbyte.com> wrote: > Hi Ramy, > > >- The projec

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] ceph gate unstable

On 07/21/2015 10:51 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, It seems like the gating is failing with cep tests: http://logs.openstack.org/29/199129/6/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-full-ceph/bfe423d/logs/testr_results.html.gz Is anyone looking into this? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203845/ is a band-aid, And

  1   2   >