2Everybody,
Just curios why we need such complexity.
Let's take a look from other side:
1) Information about all hosts (even in case of 100k hosts) will be less
then 1 GB
2) Usually servers that runs scheduler service have at least 64GB RAM and
more on the board
3) math.log(10) < 12 (binary
Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2015-10-11 00:02:39 -0700:
> 2Everybody,
>
> Just curios why we need such complexity.
>
>
> Let's take a look from other side:
> 1) Information about all hosts (even in case of 100k hosts) will be less
> then 1 GB
> 2) Usually servers that runs scheduler
On 11/10/2015 6:25 PM, "Clint Byrum" wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2015-10-11 00:02:39 -0700:
> > 2Everybody,
> >
> > Just curios why we need such complexity.
> >
> >
> > Let's take a look from other side:
> > 1) Information about all hosts (even in case of 100k hosts) will
Clint,
There are many PROS and CONS in both of approaches.
Reinventing wheel (in this case it's quite simple task) and it gives more
flexibility and doesn't require
usage of ZK/Consul (which will simplify integration of it with current
system)
Using ZK/Consul for POC may save a lot of time and a
You can have a periodic task that asks your backend if it needs sync info.
Another option is to define a vendor-specific extension that makes it easy
to retrieve all info in one call via the HTTP API.
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 2:24 AM, Germy Lure wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After restarting, Agents load
For the particular Nova Neutron example, the Neutron Kilo API should still
be compatible with the calls Havana Nova makes. I think you will need to
disable the Nova callbacks on the Neutron side because the Havana version
wasn't expecting them.
I've tried out many N+1 combinations (e.g. Icehouse +
+2 for both, counts! Vladyslav and John.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Chris K wrote:
> +1 for both so +2 :)
>
> -Chris
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Jay Faulkner wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> From: Jim Rollenhagen
>> Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2015
I have a quick question: how is Amazon doing this? When choosing a next
path forward that reliably scales, would be interesting to know how this is
already being done.
On Oct 9, 2015 10:12 AM, "Zane Bitter" wrote:
> On 08/10/15 21:32, Ian Wells wrote:
>
>>
>> > 2. if many hosts suit the 5 VMs
I'm in! And hope I can put some other folks in too.
Em sáb, 10 de out de 2015 às 12:03, Lance Bragstad
escreveu:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Boris Bobrov
> wrote:
>
>> On Saturday 10 October 2015 08:42:10 Shinobu Kinjo wrote:
>> > So what's the procedure?
>>
>> You go to #openstack-keyst
Thanks Clint!
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-10-10 17:43:40 -0700:
> > I'm curious is there any more detail about #1 below anywhere online?
> >
> > Does cassandra use some features of the JVM that the openJDK version
> > doesn
Since there are already two services Fuel Client has to interact with, I filed
a bug, for using service discovery: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1504471
> 9 жовт. 2015 р. о 11:25 Roman Prykhodchenko написав(ла):
>
> In that case I would suggest to also use Keystone service directory for
Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2015-10-11 00:02:39 -0700:
2Everybody,
Just curios why we need such complexity.
Let's take a look from other side:
1) Information about all hosts (even in case of 100k hosts) will be less
then 1 GB
2) Usually servers that runs sched
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 02:47:01PM -0700, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been thinking a lot about Ironic's core reviewer team and how we might
> make it better.
>
> I'd like to grow the team more through trust and mentoring. We should be
> able to promote someone to core based on a go
Please note that you jumped there from developer-focus to user-focus. Of
course some users are also developers, and vice versa, but I would expect doc
focussed on development to be quite different from that focussed on use.
For development doc, I think the Neutron devref is a great example, so
Thank you all for the nomination and support! It is a big responsibility to
be a member of the core team, and I'll do my best to justify your trust.
Vlad
On Oct 11, 2015 20:33, "Jim Rollenhagen" wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 02:47:01PM -0700, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've be
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/968696/comments/39
1. Add a config value ADMIN_PROJECT_ID
2. In token creation, if ADMIN_PROJECT_ID is not None: only add the
admin role to the token if the id of the scoped project == ADMIN_PROJECT_ID
Does this work?
__
I also would like to say thank you for the nomination and support. I am
honored and humbled to be chosen. Thank you to all of you for this vote of
confidence and I will do my best to maintain it.
And congrats to Vlad, it is well deserved :)
John
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Vladyslav Drok
Oh, right, and now I can vote for John, +2 :)
On Oct 11, 2015 21:59, "John Villalovos" wrote:
> I also would like to say thank you for the nomination and support. I am
> honored and humbled to be chosen. Thank you to all of you for this vote of
> confidence and I will do my best to maintain it.
>
On 10 October 2015 at 12:14, Clint Byrum wrote:
>> I think the important thing is to focus on what we have in 6 months
>> doesn't break current users / applications, and is incrementally closer
>> to our end game. That's the lens I'm going to keep putting on this one.
>>
>
> Right, so adopting a
On 9 October 2015 at 06:47, Adam Young wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 12:50 PM, Chivers, Doug wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> At a previous OpenStack Security Project IRC meeting, we briefly discussed
>> a lightweight traditional PKI using the Anchor validation functionality, for
>> use in internal deployments
Dims,
Not that I know of; I believe that Cassandra works fine with OpenJDK. See [1]
and [2].
From time to time, there have been questions about the supported JDK for
Cassandra, a recent one (just that I happen to remember this) tries to make the
case that you must use Sun/Oracle JDK. This is n
On 10 October 2015 at 02:58, Cory Benfield wrote:
>
>> On 9 Oct 2015, at 14:40, William M Edmonds wrote:
>>
>> Cory Benfield writes:
>> > > The problem that occurs is the result of a few interacting things:
>> > > - requests has very very specific versions of urllib3 it works with.
>> > > So sp
To all,
Ok, thanks for the advices.
Thanks. :)
On 10/09/2015 08:27 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-10-09 17:00:27 +0800 (+0800), Tang Chen wrote:
[...]
I'm not sure if it is a good idea. Please help to review the
following BP.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+spec/ci-rfc-mech
On 10/11/2015 06:50 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 9 October 2015 at 06:47, Adam Young wrote:
On 10/08/2015 12:50 PM, Chivers, Doug wrote:
Hi All,
At a previous OpenStack Security Project IRC meeting, we briefly discussed
a lightweight traditional PKI using the Anchor validation functionality,
Hi, everyone.
I install a devstack from the latest code. But there is an error when I
create a db migration script. My migration shell is:
"neutron-db-manage --config-file /etc/neutron/neutron.conf --config-file
/etc/neutron/plugins/ml2/ml2_conf.ini revision -m "Just For Test""
The error
Hi
Can anyone plz help me on how to specify a simple query with multiple values
for a query field in a Ceilometer meter-list request? I need to fetch meters
that belongs to more than one project id. I have tried the following query
format, but only the last query value (in this case, project_id
Hi Zhi,
We already have a defect logged for this issue.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1503342
Thanks
Vikram
On Oct 12, 2015 8:10 AM, "Zhi Chang" wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
> I install a devstack from the latest code. But there is an error when
> I create a db migration script. My mig
Thanks for your reply. What should I do if I want to create a new migration
script?
Thanks
Zhi Chang
-- Original --
From: "Vikram Choudhary";
Date: Mon, Oct 12, 2015 12:22 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
questions)";
Subject: R
On 08/10/15 03:40, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 10/07/2015 09:08 AM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote:
>> Rich Megginson writes:
>>
>>> On 10/06/2015 02:36 PM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote:
Rich Megginson writes:
> On 09/30/2015 11:43 AM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote:
>> Gilles Dubreuil writes
On 08/10/15 07:17, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 10/07/2015 03:54 PM, Matt Fischer wrote:
>>
>> I thought the agreement was that default would be assumed so that we
>> didn't break backwards compatibility?
>>
>
> puppet-heat had already started using domains, and had already written
> their code ba
Meeting on #openstack-meeting-alt at 1400 UTC (8:00AM MDT)
1) Mitaka planning
2) Opens
--
Don Dugger
"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Hi,
I am trying to add a simple app like MySql into a new enviroment from the
murano dashboard and trying to deploy the environment and I get the error -
"[yaql.exceptions.YaqlExecutionException]: Unable to run values"
I saw that this error/bug was already reported some time back and made sure
th
32 matches
Mail list logo
