Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Retiring ceilometerclient

On 2018-01-11 07:48, Thomas Bechtold wrote: > Hi, > > On 11.01.2018 01:18, gordon chung wrote: >> >> >> On 2018-01-10 06:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: It's worth pointing out that openstacksdk has ceilometer REST API support in it, although it is special-cased since ceilometer was

[openstack-dev] [publiccloud-wg]Public Cloud Feature List Hackathon Day 2

Hi Folks, Today we are gonna continue to comb through the public cloud feature list[0] as we did yesterday. Please join the discussion at #openstack-publiccloud starting from UTC1400. [0]https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Mf8OAyTzZxCKzYHMgBl-QK_2- XSycSkOjqCyMTIedkA/edit?usp=sharing --

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Retiring ceilometerclient

Hi, On 11.01.2018 01:18, gordon chung wrote: On 2018-01-10 06:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: It's worth pointing out that openstacksdk has ceilometer REST API support in it, although it is special-cased since ceilometer was retired before we even made the service-types-authority: so

Re: [openstack-dev] Retirement of astara repos?

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 3:50 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > While going through various repos looking at things to be cleaned up, I > noticed the last commit for openstack/astara > was well over a year ago. Based on this and the little bit I have followed > with this project,

[openstack-dev] [nova] enable vm video, sound card

Hi, stackers I want to enable video and sound driver of vm, but there are no codes in nova. I found a blueprint about this( https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-spice-video-sound-driver), it looks like almost complete but not merged. And this is custom patch to add video and sound

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday Jan 11th at 8:00 UTC

Hello everyone, Hope everyone is back from vacation. QA team is resuming the regular weekly meeting from today. OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be Thursday, Jan 11th at 8:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel. The agenda for the meeting can be found here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Retiring ceilometerclient

I'm favor of dropping Ceilometer API support in the SDK if we claim 1.0 will support Queens and beyond. If the SDK has to support previous versions (Pike, Ocata, etc), then we should warn the SDK users that Ceilometer API has been deprecated and removed so depending on your cloud provider the SDK

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Retiring ceilometerclient

Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2018-01-10 18:08:52 -0600: > On 01/10/2018 05:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2018-01-10 17:40:28 -0600: > >> On 01/10/2018 04:10 PM, Jon Schlueter wrote: > >>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:12 PM, gordon chung

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Retiring ceilometerclient

On 2018-01-10 06:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> It's worth pointing out that openstacksdk has ceilometer REST API >> support in it, although it is special-cased since ceilometer was retired >> before we even made the service-types-authority: so ceilometer's REST API does not exist anymore. i

[openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] nova support for volume multiattach

Hi everyone, I wanted to point out that the nova API patch for volume mulitattach support is available for review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/271047/ It's actually a series of changes, but that is the last one that enables the feature in nova. It relies on the 2.59 compute API

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Retiring ceilometerclient

On 01/10/2018 05:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2018-01-10 17:40:28 -0600: On 01/10/2018 04:10 PM, Jon Schlueter wrote: On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:12 PM, gordon chung wrote: On 2017-11-22 04:18 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: Hi, Now that the

[openstack-dev] [NEEDACTION] Call for mentors for Google Summer of Code 2018

Hi all, Google Summer of Code (GSoC) is a program that matches mentoring organizations with college and university student developers who are paid to write open source code. It has been around 2005 and we had been accepted as a mentor organization in only one opportunity (2014) having a great

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Retiring ceilometerclient

Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2018-01-10 17:40:28 -0600: > On 01/10/2018 04:10 PM, Jon Schlueter wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:12 PM, gordon chung wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 2017-11-22 04:18 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Now that the Ceilometer

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Retiring ceilometerclient

On 01/10/2018 04:10 PM, Jon Schlueter wrote: On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:12 PM, gordon chung wrote: On 2017-11-22 04:18 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: Hi, Now that the Ceilometer API is gone, we really don't need ceilometerclient anymore. I've proposed a set of patches to retire it:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Retiring ceilometerclient

Excerpts from gordon chung's message of 2018-01-10 23:28:05 +: > > On 2018-01-10 05:10 PM, Jon Schlueter wrote: > > I would think that a discussion around retiring a project should also > > include at least enumerating > > which projects are currently consuming it [5]. That way a little bit

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Retiring ceilometerclient

On 2018-01-10 05:10 PM, Jon Schlueter wrote: > I would think that a discussion around retiring a project should also > include at least enumerating > which projects are currently consuming it [5]. That way a little bit > of pressure on those consumers > can be exerted to evaluate their usage of

[openstack-dev] Retirement of astara repos?

While going through various repos looking at things to be cleaned up, I noticed the last commit for openstack/astara was well over a year ago. Based on this and the little bit I have followed with this project, it’s my understanding that there is no further work planned with Astara. Should

Re: [openstack-dev] zuulv3 log structure and format grumblings

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 8:35 PM melanie witt wrote: > On Fri, 05 Jan 2018 10:43:59 -0800, Clark Boylan wrote: > > To expand a bit more on that what we are attempting to do is port the > log handling code in devstack-gate [0] to zuul v3 jobs living in tempest > [1]. The new

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Retiring ceilometerclient

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:12 PM, gordon chung wrote: > > > > On 2017-11-22 04:18 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Now that the Ceilometer API is gone, we really don't need > > ceilometerclient anymore. I've proposed a set of patches to retire it: > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][release][nova][infra] Release of openstack/nova failed

On 2018-01-10 16:40:01 -0500 (-0500), Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] > The failure from [1] is during the step where the "sibling" > packages are installed and says "pip python module is required". [...] There were some "bad" images in production earlier which were missing pip. When that was caught

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][release][nova][infra] Release of openstack/nova failed

Excerpts from zuul's message of 2018-01-10 01:38:45 +: > Build failed. > > - release-openstack-python-without-pypi > http://logs.openstack.org/d6/d6ce901fe280004edbe2f27d8af374ff905161d6/release/release-openstack-python-without-pypi/10069b4/ > : FAILURE in 4m 23s > - announce-release

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes-python-client] Failed to get service list

Thanks for the reminder, Michal. I sent the email here because the client library is dependency of several openstack projects, the issue I found may cause potential problems to them, and I also want to get some hints if they already solved that. Cheers, Lingxian Kong (Larry) On Thu, Jan 11,

Re: [openstack-dev] zuulv3 log structure and format grumblings

On Fri, 05 Jan 2018 10:43:59 -0800, Clark Boylan wrote: To expand a bit more on that what we are attempting to do is port the log handling code in devstack-gate [0] to zuul v3 jobs living in tempest [1]. The new job in tempest itself relies on the ansible process-test-results role which can

Re: [openstack-dev] [All][Infra] Meltdown Patching

When a patch loves a bug very, very much Matt Riedemann wrote: On 1/10/2018 12:11 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: or anything else really. Clark, where do babies come from? __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [All][Infra] Meltdown Patching

On 1/10/2018 12:11 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: or anything else really. Clark, where do babies come from? -- Thanks, Matt __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] state of pdns4 backend

Hi Ritesh, see in line: On 08/01/18 23:02, Ritesh Anand wrote: > Hi Stackers, > > I see that we moved from PowerDNS Backend to PDNS4 backend, I have a few > questions in that regard: > > 1. Should powerdns 3.4 (with PowerDNS backend) continue to work fine on > Pike OpenStack? Yes - as long as

Re: [openstack-dev] [All][Infra] Meltdown Patching

On 2018-01-10 01:11 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: Hello everyone, As a general heads up Ubuntu has published new kernels which enable kernel page table isolation to address the meltdown vulnerability that made the news last week. The infra team is currently working through patching our Ubuntu

[openstack-dev] [All][Infra] Meltdown Patching

Hello everyone, As a general heads up Ubuntu has published new kernels which enable kernel page table isolation to address the meltdown vulnerability that made the news last week. The infra team is currently working through patching our Ubuntu servers to pick up these fixes. Unfortunately

[openstack-dev] [kolla] PTL non candidacy

Hello, A bit earlier than usually, but I'd like to say that I won't be running for PTL reelection for Rocky cycle. I had privilege of being PTL of Kolla for last 3 cycles and I would like to thank Kolla community for this opportunity and trust. I'm very proud of what we've accomplished over last

[openstack-dev] [docs] Documentation meeting minutes for 2018-01-10

=== #openstack-doc: docteam === Meeting started by pkovar at 16:00:32 UTC. The full logs are available at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/docteam/2018/docteam.2018-01-10-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary --- * roll call (pkovar,

Re: [openstack-dev] Retiring Evoque Projects

> > > > Unless I hear otherwise soon, I will be starting the process to retire this > > project and clean up things like its zuul and gerrit configuration. > > Thanks, see also > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-December/125352.html, > > Andreas Oh, sorry Andreas, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes-python-client] Failed to get service list

On 01/10/2018 07:40 AM, Lingxian Kong wrote: > I submitted an issue in github[1] the other day but didn't get any > response, try my luck to attract attention here in case someone else has > the same problem or already has a solution I didn't know, or hopefully, I > missed something. > This is

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Rocky PTG Planning Etherpad ...

Team, Hard to believe that Queens is wrapping up already and that we need to be thinking about the PTG in Dublin ... but here it is. I have started an etherpad [1] to record your planned attendance and any topics you want to cover at the PTG.  Just get them listed at the top and I will

Re: [openstack-dev] Retiring Evoque Projects

On 2018-01-10 14:00, Sean McGinnis wrote: > While doing some cleanup, I noticed the Evoque projects (openstack/evoque and > openstack/evoque-ui) have not had any activity since the beginning of 2016, > with the team's last official meeting held in December of 2015. > > I contacted the core team

[openstack-dev] [ptg] Post-lunch presentation(s)

Hi everyone, One complain that was expressed in past PTG feedback session(s) was the lack of situational awareness and a missed opportunity for "global" communication at the event. To address that, in Dublin we'd like to use the end of the lunch break for general communications that could be

[openstack-dev] Retiring Evoque Projects

While doing some cleanup, I noticed the Evoque projects (openstack/evoque and openstack/evoque-ui) have not had any activity since the beginning of 2016, with the team's last official meeting held in December of 2015. I contacted the core team for this project, and luckily they were very

[openstack-dev] [nova] about rebuild and rescue instance booted from volume

Hi,all This is the spec about rebuild and rescue a instance booted from volume, anyone who is interested in booted from volume can help to review this. Any suggestion is welcome. The link is here. Re:the rebuild spec:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/532407/

[openstack-dev] [docs] Documentation meeting today

Hi all, The docs meeting will continue today at 16:00 UTC in #openstack-doc, as scheduled. For more details, see the meeting page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/DocTeamMeeting Cheers, pk __ OpenStack Development

[openstack-dev] [acceleration]Cyborg Team Weekly Meeting 2018.01.10

Hi Team, We will have our regular team meeting today starting UTC1500 at #openstack-cyborg as usual. The main agenda is to go over action items from last week's meeting and see what we could close now and what remains challenging. -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard &