Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][radosgw][devstack-ceph-plugin] tempest failure with radosgw as swift endpoint

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > Hi stackers, >Facing some issue running tempest with ceph radosgw as the swift > endpoint. > >I enabled radosgw as part of a test-only patch which configures it as > the >swift endpoint, the CI fails s

[openstack-dev] [tempest][radosgw][devstack-ceph-plugin] tempest failure with radosgw as swift endpoint

Hi stackers, Facing some issue running tempest with ceph radosgw as the swift endpoint. I enabled radosgw as part of a test-only patch which configures it as the swift endpoint, the CI fails since tempest's verify-tempest-config fails Console logs are at [1], tempest logs @ [2] The

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Mitaka Design Summit Recap

Thanks Sean for the nice recap, helps folks who couldn't attend the summit. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:53 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > Cinder Mitaka Design Summit Summary > > Will the Real Block Storage Service Please Stand Up > === > Should Cinder be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] CephFS native driver

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 3:32 PM, John Spray wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 7:19 PM, John Spray wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I've recently started work

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] CephFS native driver

On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 4:32 PM, John Spray wrote: > On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 1:27 AM, Ben Swartzlander > wrote: > > On 09/24/2015 09:49 AM, John Spray wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I've recently started work on a CephFS driver for Manila. The (early) > >> code is here: > >> https://github.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Mike Perez wrote: > It gives me great pleasure to nominate Gorka Eguileor for Cinder core. > > Gorka's contributions to Cinder core have been much apprecated: > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:%22Gorka+Eguileor%22+project:openstack/cinder,p,0035b641000

[openstack-dev] [nova] [FFE] Feature Freeze Exception Request for 'Volume Snapshot Improvements'

Hello Nova cores, I would like to request feature freeze exception for the volume snapshot improvements blueprint [1] This bp was proposed in Juno, but could not be implemented then, hence was pushed to Liberty, and the patches [2] for the same have been on review for the last 2+ months a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][qa] encrypted volumes tests don't actually test encrypted volumes for most backends

Thanks Mike for the heads up I fixed it for GlusterFS CI [1] Post the fix, glusterfs CI jobs are running fine [2] See Jul 10, 10:43 AM onwards thanx, deepak [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200399/2 [2]: https://jenkins07.openstack.org/job/check-tempest-dsvm-full-glusterfs-nv/ On Fri, Jul

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][qa] encrypted volumes tests don't actually test encrypted volumes for most backends

Oh, just to be clear, I don't mean to discard what you fixed My intention was to discuss what would be a better way to fix this in future thru a feature/blueprint, given there is a consensus thanx, deepak On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][qa] encrypted volumes tests don't actually test encrypted volumes for most backends

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 7/2/2015 4:12 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:17 AM, Mike Perez > <mailto:thin...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> On 12:24 Jun 26, Matt Riedemann wrot

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][qa] encrypted volumes tests don't actually test encrypted volumes for most backends

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:17 AM, Mike Perez wrote: > On 12:24 Jun 26, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > So the question is, is everyone OK with this and ready to make that > change? > > Thanks for all your work on this Matt. > +100, awesome debug, followup and fixing work by Matt > > I'm fine with t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Expected Manila behavior for creation of share from snapshot

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Ben Swartzlander wrote: > On 06/18/2015 07:08 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Ben Swartzlander > wrote: > >> On 06/03/2015 12:43 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: >> >> >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Expected Manila behavior for creation of share from snapshot

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Ben Swartzlander wrote: > On 06/03/2015 12:43 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Valeriy Ponomaryov < > vponomar...@mirantis.com> wrote: > >> Deepak, >> >> "transfer-*"

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Getting `ValueError: Field `volume_id' cannot be None`

, can you let me know pls ? ALternatively I am fine if you want to collaborate on my patch and add snapshot_admin_metadata object support too ? Let me know pls thanx, deepak On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > Thang, > Thanks! Its still not clear to me why my

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Getting `ValueError: Field `volume_id' cannot be None`

e work, I just edited it to just have it pass the unit tests. > > Thang > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > >> I was able to narrow down to the scenario where it fails only when i do: >> >> ./r

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Getting `ValueError: Field `volume_id' cannot be None`

in test_remotefs.py and VolumeTestCase.test_can_delete_errored_snapshot in test_volume.py failure Can someone help here ? thanx, deepak On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > Hi Thang, > Since you are working on Snapshot Objects, any idea on why the testcase >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Getting `ValueError: Field `volume_id' cannot be None`

Hi Thang, Since you are working on Snapshot Objects, any idea on why the testcase when run all by itself, works, but when run as part of the overall suite, fails ? This seems to be related to the Snapshot Objects, hence Ccing you. On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Expected Manila behavior for creation of share from snapshot

hat work ? > Valeriy > > On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Deepak Shetty > wrote: > >> >> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Duncan Thomas >> wrote: >> >>> On 28 May 2015 at 13:03, Deepak Shetty wrote: >>> >>>> Isn't this simi

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Getting `ValueError: Field `volume_id' cannot be None`

Hi All, I am hitting a strange issue when running Cinder unit tests against my patch @ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/172808/5 I have spent 1 day and haven't been successfull at figuring how/why my patch is causing it! All tests failing are part of VolumeTestCase suite and from the error (see

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Expected Manila behavior for creation of share from snapshot

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Duncan Thomas wrote: > On 28 May 2015 at 13:03, Deepak Shetty wrote: > >> Isn't this similar to what cinder transfer-* cmds are for ? Ability to >> transfer cinder volume across tenants >> So Manila should be implementing the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Expected Manila behavior for creation of share from snapshot

Isn't this similar to what cinder transfer-* cmds are for ? Ability to transfer cinder volume across tenants So Manila should be implementing the transfer-* cmds, after which admin/user can create a clone then initiate a transfer to a diff tenant ? On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Valeriy Ponomar

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Does Nova has a command line to restart an instance?

nova start On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Lily.Sing wrote: > Hi experts, > > I setup an OpenStack multinode environment without Horizon installed. > After host rebooting, the instances are in 'shutoff' status. I hope to > re-use these instances, but seems there is no command line for this. An

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][libvirt] Understand why we lookup libvirt domains by instance name

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Mathieu Gagné wrote: > On 2015-05-21 4:18 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: > >>> > >> > >> I guess it's for the reason I mentioned above: > >> > >> To not break all OpenStack installations on Earth running with default > >> config values. > >> > > > > So that's not breaki

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Do we have weekly meeting today ?

Given folks are at the summit, is this mtg happening today ? __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/

Re: [openstack-dev] [SOLVED] [Nova] gate-nova-python27 failure

https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1451389 and the associated bugfix @ https://review.openstack.org/179746 should solve this. thanks garyk! thanx, deepak On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > Hi All, > I am seeing the below failure for one of my patch (which i beli

[openstack-dev] [Nova] gate-nova-python27 failure

Hi All, I am seeing the below failure for one of my patch (which i believe is not related to the changes i did in my patch) - Correct me if i am wrong :) 2015-05-04 07:22:06.116 | {3}

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Mount automation using Zeroconf

Hi, Have we considered cloud-init and qemu guest agent, I remember there was some discussion around this in the prev summit, but i couldn't find any etherpad/notes on that. I had one more question in this regards. Is it possible to do some kind of VM hotplug add operation as part of manila acces

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] plugin: Giving ability for plugin repo to override tempest tests

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 04/15/2015 01:51 AM, Andrey M. Pavlov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We have similar situation with our stackforge/ec2-api project. > > Patches in openstack repos can break our plugin. > > But I don't see any possibility until our project not in Ope

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] plugin: Giving ability for plugin repo to override tempest tests

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Andrey M. Pavlov wrote: > > And another solution - make tempest job as non-voting for your > project(glusterfs) like we did it for ec2-api. > > Andrey. > We already do that for glusterfs & its voting, but changes to tempest regex doesn't go thru the plugin repo,

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] plugin: Giving ability for plugin repo to override tempest tests

Forgot to mention the patch links.. see below On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > Hi Stackers, >devstack-plugin doesn't have ability to override tempest settings. > Currently it only > provides a way to override localrc settings, but over time we have

[openstack-dev] [devstack] plugin: Giving ability for plugin repo to override tempest tests

Hi Stackers, devstack-plugin doesn't have ability to override tempest settings. Currently it only provides a way to override localrc settings, but over time we have seen that many CI jobs fail due to many different issues (lack of support, new tempest test enabled recently which fails for a part

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Query on adding new table to cinder DB

Thanks eOne! :) On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > Hi Deepak, > > Your steps look good for e except #3.1 - add unit-tests for new migrations > > Regards, > Ivan Kolodyazhny > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Deepak Shetty > wrote: > >

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Query on adding new table to cinder DB

Hi Stackers, As part of my WIP work for implementing https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/volume-snapshot-improvements I am required to add a new table to cinder (snapshot_admin_metadata) and I was looking for some inputs on whats are the steps to add a new table to existing DB >From wh

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cinder] [Tempest] Regarding deleting snapshot when instance is OFF

+ [Cinder] and [Tempest] in the $subject since this affects them too On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 04/08/2015 12:01 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > > > Questions: > > > > 1) Is this a valid scenario being tested ? Some say yes, I am not sure, &g

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Regarding deleting snapshot when instance is OFF

Hi, Cinder w/ GlusterFS backend is hitting the below error as part of test_volume_boot_pattern tempest testcase (at the end of testcase when it deletes the snap) "/usr/local/ lib/python2.7/dist-packages/libvirt.py", line 792, in blockRebase 2015-04-08 07:22:44.376 32701 TRACE nova.virt.libvi

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift] swift memory usage in centos7 devstack jobs

his. > Cool, and its not related to glusterfs IMHO. Since it was happening even w/o glusterfs (with just the tempest all tests running with defaults) thanx, deepak > > On 04/01/2015 07:58 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > >> 1) So why did this happen on rax VM only, the same (Centos job)

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift] swift memory usage in centos7 devstack jobs

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Ian Wienand wrote: > On 03/27/2015 08:47 PM, Alan Pevec wrote: > >> But how come that same recent pyOpenSSL doesn't consume more memory on >> Ubuntu? >> > > Just to loop back on the final status of this ... > > pyOpenSSL 0.14 does seem to use about an order of magn

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > >> On 03/25/2015 09:26 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: >> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Deepak Shetty > > <mailto:dpkshe...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 03/25/2015 09:26 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Deepak Shetty > <mailto:dpkshe...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > Had a question here, why is this source in the end ? > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: > I wasn't clear, let me try again: > > CINDER_ENABLED_BACKENDS=";" > > set the value to the separator character semi-colon. That evaluates to > not-empty for the shell :- but has no entries so is still effectively null > for the cinder confi

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Deepak Shetty > wrote: > >> Sorry, hit send before i could complete >> back to square one (unless we modify lib/cinder to *not* use default for >> CINDER_ENABLED_BACKENDS >

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 03/25/2015 03:16 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Deepak Shetty > <mailto:dpkshe...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, M

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Deepak Shetty > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Sean Dague wrote: >> >>> On 03/25/2015 03:16 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: >>&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > >> On 03/25/2015 03:16 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Deepak Shetty > > <mailto:dpksh

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 03/25/2015 03:16 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Deepak Shetty > <mailto:dpkshe...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, M

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Third-Party CI: adding Mellanox CI to Wiki

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Lenny Verkhovsky wrote: > Hi All, > > Please add Mellanox Cinder CI to this page > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/third-party-ci-status > Lenny, You should be able to edit and add this yourself, once you login with your ID on that page thanx, deepa

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

+ Sean Dague On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Deepak Shetty > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Ian Wienand >> wrote: >> >>> On 03/24/2015 03:17 PM, D

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Ian Wienand wrote: > >> On 03/24/2015 03:17 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: >> > For eg: Look at [1] >> > [1] >> https://github.com/stackforge/devstack-plug

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Ian Wienand wrote: > On 03/24/2015 03:17 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > For eg: Look at [1] > > [1] > https://github.com/stackforge/devstack-plugin-glusterfs/blob/master/devstack/settings > > > I would like ability to change these wh

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Third-Party CI: what next? (was Re: [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI))

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Walter A. Boring IV wrote: > On 03/23/2015 01:50 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > >> On 12:59 Mon 23 Mar , Stefano Maffulli wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 11:43 -0700, Mike Perez wrote: >>> We've been talking about CI's for a year. We started talking about CI

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Updating 'scheduled_at' field of nova instances in the database.

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Deepthi Dharwar < > deep...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > >> On 03/23/2015 09:00 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: >> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:18:28AM +0530, Deepthi Dharwar

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Updating 'scheduled_at' field of nova instances in the database.

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Deepthi Dharwar < deep...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On 03/23/2015 09:00 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:18:28AM +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: > >> All the VM information is stored in the instances table. > >> This includes all the time relat

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Ian Wienand wrote: > On 03/23/2015 09:20 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > >> Hi all, >>I was wondering if there was a neat way to override the settings file >> present in the devstack plugin stackforge project. >> >> For eg:

[openstack-dev] [devstack] Overriding settings file for devstack plugin

Hi all, I was wondering if there was a neat way to override the settings file present in the devstack plugin stackforge project. For eg: stackforge/devstack-plugin-glusterfs I plan to use `enable_plugin glusterfs ` in my local to setup GlusterFS backend for openstack But I am forced to use the

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Cinder-GlusterFS CI update

Hi All, Quick update. We added GlusterFS CI job (gate-tempest-dsvm-full-glusterfs) to *check pipeline (non-voting)* after the patch @ [1] was merged. Its been running successfully ( so far so good ) on Cinder patches, few examples are in [2] I also updated the 3rd party CI status page [3]

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

]: https://review.openstack.org/160664 [2]: https://jenkins07.openstack.org/job/gate-tempest-dsvm-full-glusterfs/ [3]: https://jenkins02.openstack.org/job/gate-tempest-dsvm-full-glusterfs/ thanx, deepak On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Danny Al-Gaaf wrote: > Am 03.03.2015 um 19:31 schrieb Deepak Shetty: > [...] > >> For us security is very critical, as the performance is too. The > >> first solution via ganesha is not what we prefer (to use CephFS > >> via p9 an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Luis Pabon wrote: > What is the status on virtfs? I am not sure if it is being maintained. > Does anyone know? > The last i knew its not maintained. Also for what its worth, p9 won't work for windows guest (unless there is a p9 driver for windows ?) if that is p

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Need +A (workflow +1) for https://review.openstack.org/156940

AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > Hi all, > > Can someone give +A to https://review.openstack.org/156940 - we have > > the rest. Need to get this merged for glusterfs CI to pass the > > snapshot_when_volume_in_use testcases

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Need +A (workflow +1) for https://review.openstack.org/156940

Hi all, Can someone give +A to https://review.openstack.org/156940 - we have the rest. Need to get this merged for glusterfs CI to pass the snapshot_when_volume_in_use testcases. thanx, deepak __ OpenStack Development Mai

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][glusterfs] Online Snapshot fails with GlusterFS

Duncan, Attila, Thanks for your response. We found a issue when using os_priviledge_user_name which is when we sent this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156940/ Post that we used admin user, its password and admin tenant in cinder.conf to make it work But we thought that using admin cr

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Deepak Shetty > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Deepak Shetty >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 25, 201

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Deepak Shetty > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Jeremy Stanley >> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-02-25 17:02:34 +0530 (+0530),

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][glusterfs] Online Snapshot fails with GlusterFS

Thanks Bharat for starting this thread I would like to invite suggestions/opinions from tempest folks on whats the right way to get this to work ? 1) Use priviledge user in cinder.conf --or -- 2) Modify tempest volume snapshot_in_use testcase to bump the user to admin, run the test, revert back

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2015-02-25 01:02:07 +0530 (+0530), Bharat Kumar wrote: > [...] > > After running 971 test cases VM inaccessible for 569 ticks > [...] > > Glad you're able to reproduce it. For the record that is running > their 8GB performance flavor wit

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > >> On 2015-02-25 17:02:34 +0530 (+0530), Deepak Shetty wrote: >> [...] >> > Run 2) We removed glusterfs backend, so Cinder was configured with

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2015-02-25 17:02:34 +0530 (+0530), Deepak Shetty wrote: > [...] > > Run 2) We removed glusterfs backend, so Cinder was configured with > > the default storage backend i.e. LVM. We re-created the OOM here > > to

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2015-02-25 01:02:07 +0530 (+0530), Bharat Kumar wrote: > [...] > > After running 971 test cases VM inaccessible for 569 ticks > [...] > > Glad you're able to reproduce it. For the record that is running > their 8GB performance flavor wit

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

FWIW, we tried to run our job in a rax provider VM (provided by ianw from his personal account) and we ran the tempest tests twice, but the OOM did not re-create. Of the 2 runs, one of the run used the same PYTHONHASHSEED as we had in one of the failed runs, still no oom. Jeremy graciously agreed

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

On Feb 21, 2015 12:26 AM, "Joe Gordon" wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: >> >> Hi Jeremy, >> Couldn't find anything strong in the logs to back the reason for OOM. >> At the time OOM happens, mysqld and java p

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

On Feb 21, 2015 12:20 AM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: > > On 2015-02-20 16:29:31 +0100 (+0100), Deepak Shetty wrote: > > Couldn't find anything strong in the logs to back the reason for > > OOM. At the time OOM happens, mysqld and java processes have the > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

the job enabled can help us a lot. thanx, deepak On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2015-02-19 17:03:49 +0100 (+0100), Deepak Shetty wrote: > [...] > > For some reason we are seeing the centos7 glusterfs CI job getting > > aborted/ killed either by Jav

[openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

Hi clarkb, fungi, As discussed in http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-infra/%23openstack-infra.2015-02-19.log ( 2015-02-19T14:51:46 onwards), I am starting this thread to track the abrupt job failures seen on cinder-glusterfs CI job in the recent past. A small summary of the thi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila]Question about gateway-mediated-with-ganesha

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Li, Chen wrote: > Yes, I’m asking about plans for gateway-mediated-with-ganesha. > > I want to know what would you do to achieve “*And later the Ganesha core > would be extended to use the infrastructure used by generic driver to > provide network separated mult

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila]Question about gateway-mediated-with-ganesha

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Li, Chen wrote: > Hi Deepak, > > > > Ø When you say VM, its confusing, whether you are referring to service > VM or > > Ø tenant VM. Since you are also saying share-server, I presume you mean > > Ø service VM! > > > > Ø IIUC each share-server VM (also called

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila]Question about gateway-mediated-with-ganesha

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 1:51 AM, Li, Chen wrote: > Hi list, > > > > I’m trying to understand how manila use NFS-Ganesha, and hope to figure > out what I need to do to use it if all patches been merged (only one patch > is under reviewing, right ?). > > > > I have read: > > https://wiki.openstac

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack-gate] How to pass through devstack config

Putting the right tag in the subject to see if somone can help answer the below thanx, deepak On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Bharat Kumar wrote: > Hi, > > I have seen Sean Dague's patch [1], if I understood correctly, by this > patch we can reduce the number of DEVSTACK_GATE variables that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Cutoff deadlines for cinder drivers

Yuck ! its Mar. 19, 2015 (bad copy paste before) On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > Just so that people following this thread know about the final decision, > Per > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#Deadlines > the deadline for CI

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Cutoff deadlines for cinder drivers

Just so that people following this thread know about the final decision, Per https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#Deadlines the deadline for CI is extended to Mar. 3, 2015 for all volume drivers. Deadlines All volume drivers

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Devstack plugins and gate testing

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Ian Wienand wrote: > Hi, > > With [1] merged, we now have people working on creating external > plugins for devstack. > The devstack plugin concept seems logical and useful to me. GlusterFS Cinder CI is probably the first one implementing the plugin. See https:/

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Driver modes, share-servers, and clustered backends

Some of my comments inline prefixed with deepakcs On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Li, Chen wrote: > Thanks for the explanations! > Really helpful. > > My questions are added in line. > > Thanks. > -chen > > -Original Message- > From: Ben Swartzlander [mailto:b...@swartzlander.org] >

Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy

Raildo, Thanks for putting the blog, i really liked it as it helps to understand how hmt works. I am interested to know more about how hmt can be exploited for other OpenStack projects... Esp cinder, manila On Dec 23, 2014 5:55 AM, "Morgan Fainberg" wrote: > Hi Raildo, > > Thanks for putting t

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][infra] Ceph CI status update

://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/third-party-ci-status (one of column is status column) How are the 2 different ? Do we need to update both ? thanx, deepak On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Anita Kuno wrote: > > On 12/12/2014 03:28 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][infra] Ceph CI status update

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: > On 12/11/2014 09:36 AM, Jon Bernard wrote: > > Heya, quick Ceph CI status update. Once the test_volume_boot_pattern > > was marked as skipped, only the revert_resize test was failing. I have > > submitted a patch to nova for this [1], and th

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Need reviews for "Deploy GlusterFS server" patch

Just correcting the tag and subject line in $subject, so that it gets the attention of the right group of folks (from devstack). thanx, deepak On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Bharat Kumar wrote: > Hi All, > > Regarding the patch "Deploy GlusterFS Server" ( > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/1

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Proposal to add examples/usecase as part of new features / cli / functionality patches

On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Steve Gordon wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Deepak Shetty" > > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > > > But isn&

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Proposal to add examples/usecase as part of new features / cli / functionality patches

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Duncan Thomas wrote: > I'm not sure about making it mandatory, but I can certainly see the > benefits of doing this in some cases. Maybe we can start by creating the > area and making the doc optional, and allow reviews to ask for it to be > added where they consi

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Proposal to add examples/usecase as part of new features / cli / functionality patches

anx, deepak On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Steve Gordon wrote: > >> - Original Message - >> > From: "Deepak Shetty" >> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Proposal to add examples/usecase as part of new features / cli / functionality patches

seful resource: > http://docs.openstack.org/cli-reference/content/ > > In conclusion I can say that it is question more to the organization of > creation such docs than possibility to create it in general. > > Regards, > Valeriy Ponomaryov > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 8:01 AM,

[openstack-dev] [All] Proposal to add examples/usecase as part of new features / cli / functionality patches

Hi stackers, I was having this thought which i believe applies to all projects of openstack (Hence All in the subject tag) My proposal is to have examples or usecase folder in each project which has info on how to use the feature/enhancement (which was submitted as part of a gerrit patch) In sh

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] ./run_tests issue

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 09/22/2014 01:29 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > > Thats incorrect, as i said in my original mail.. I am usign > devstack+manila > > and it wasn't very clear to me that mysql-devel needs to be installed and > > it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] ./run_tests issue

Even better, whenever ./run_tests fail... maybe put a msg stating the following C libs needs to be installed, have the user check the same..something like that would help too. On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > Thats incorrect, as i said in my original mail.. I am us

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] ./run_tests issue

: > >> And yet it's a dependency so I'm with Deepak and it should at least be >> mentioned in the prerequisites on a webpage somewhere .. :) I might even >> try and update/add that myself as it caught me out a few times too.. >> >> Alex >> On 20 Sep

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] ./run_tests issue

help: > sudo yum -y install mysql-devel > sudo pip install MySQL-python > > On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Deepak Shetty > wrote: > >> I keep hitting this issue in my F20 based devstack env ... >> >> ./run_tests.sh -V >> >> >>

[openstack-dev] [Manila] ./run_tests issue

I keep hitting this issue in my F20 based devstack env ... ./run_tests.sh -V . gcc -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -m64 -mtune=generic -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -fwra

[openstack-dev] [Manila] Debug data for the NFS v4 hang issue

Per yesterday's IRC meeting, I have updated the debug data I had collected in the github issue @ https://github.com/csabahenk/cirros/issues/9 It has data for both : 32bit nfs client accessing 64bit cirros nfs server 64bit nfs client accessing 64bit cirros nfs server thanx, deepak ___

[openstack-dev] [Manila] Request to review cert-based-access-type blueprint

Hi List, I just proposed a new bp @ https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/cert-based-access-type Looking for your feedback/comments. thanx, deepak ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/c

[openstack-dev] [Manila] Query on docstrings and method names

Hi All, With respect to the comment made by xian-yang @ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102496/1/manila/share/drivers/glusterfs.py for _update_share_status and the docstring that the method has, which is """Retrieve status info from share volume group.""" I have few questions based on the ab

[openstack-dev] [devstack][Manila][docs] Setting up Devstack with Manila on Fedora 20

Hi List, I have created a new wikipage with the goal to document the steps needed to setup DevStack with Manila on F20. Added some troubleshooting tips based on my experience. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/docs/Setting_up_DevStack_with_Manila_on_Fedora_20 Pls have a look and provide

[openstack-dev] [Manila] GenericDriver cinder volume error during manila create

I am trying devstack on F20 setup with Manila sources. When i am trying to do *manila create --name cinder_vol_share_using_nfs2 --share-network-id 36ec5a17-cef6-44a8-a518-457a6f36faa0 NFS 2 * I see the below error in c-vol due to which even tho' my service VM is started, manila create errors out

  1   2   >