Few comments below
Thx
Uri ("Oo-Ree")
C: 949-378-7568
-Original Message-
From: Yang, Yi Y [mailto:yi.y.y...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2016 5:20 PM
To: Cathy Zhang ; OpenStack Development Mailing List
(not for usage questions) ; b...@ovn.org
Cc: Jesse Gross ; Jiri Benc
Subjec
Pls note that VXLAN-gpe and VXLAN are using different UDP ports. Lots of
consideration and discussion went into this working on the IETF draft and on
ODL implementations. So I'm not sure I follow the backwards compatibility
issues raised below
In any rate, the Ovs-Eth-NSH could be making parall
Cathy
So we are ok moving forward on networking-sfc?
What is the next step from your pov?
Thx
Uri ("Oo-Ree")
C: 949-378-7568
-Original Message-
From: Cathy Zhang [mailto:cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2016 11:58 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usa
+1 from me too
How do we close on this thread? Is anyone on the ml, NOT cool with this
approach as outlined by Tim below?
Thx
Uri ("Oo-Ree")
C: 949-378-7568
-Original Message-
From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 8:48 AM
To: Ope
Hi Ben
Any guidance you can offer will be appreciated. The process has taken long time
and precious cycles. How can we get to a coordinated Kernel and OvS approach to
avoid the challenges and potentially misaligned advise we got (per Yi Yang's
mail)?
Thx
Uri ("Oo-Ree")
C: 949-378-7568
-
)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC
On 25 May 2016 at 12:29, Elzur, Uri
mailto:uri.el...@intel.com>> wrote:
Armando
I’m asking for a clear answer “I think the position here is as follows: if a
technology is not mainstream, i.e. readily availab
dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Elzur, Uri wrote:
> Armando
>
>
>
> I’m asking for a clear answer “I think the position here is as
> follows: if a technology is not mainstream, i.e. readily available via
> distros and the various c
: Armando M. [mailto:arma...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11:06 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC
On 24 May 2016 at 22:07, Elzur, Uri
mailto:uri.el...@intel.com>> wrote:
Hi A
Tim
+1 for me (guess not surprising...)
Thx
Uri (“Oo-Ree”)
C: 949-378-7568
-Original Message-
From: Tim Rozet [mailto:tro...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:24 AM
To: Armando M. ; Elzur, Uri
Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re
2016 at 21:53, Elzur, Uri
mailto:uri.el...@intel.com>> wrote:
Hi Tim
Sorry for the delay due to travel...
This note is very helpful!
We are in agreement that the team including the individuals cited below are
supportive. We also agree that SFC belongs in the networking-SFC project (with
May 2016 at 17:37, Elzur, Uri
mailto:uri.el...@intel.com>> wrote:
Hi Armando, Cathy, All
First I apologize for the delay, returning from a week long international trip.
(yes, I know, a lousy excuse on many accounts…)
If I’m attempting to summarize all the responses, it seems like
•
keeps a decent pace of rolling out
new features broadly supported elsewhere.
Thx
Uri (“Oo-Ree”)
C: 949-378-7568
-Original Message-
From: Tim Rozet [mailto:tro...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 7:01 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
; Elzur, Uri
C
, it’s not open as openstack defines it:
https://governance.openstack.org/reference/opens.html
There isn’t any wiggle room there. This isn’t a neutron argument; feel free to
take it up with the TC.
Thanks,
doug
On May 20, 2016, at 6:37 PM, Elzur, Uri
mailto:uri.el...@intel.com>> wrote:
eliver whatever technology stack they want with it and we'd happily gather any
feedback to iterate on the abstraction to address more and more use case.
AFAIK, it is the position of Neutron to have any OVS related new features
developed inside the OVS community.
Thanks,
Cathy
From:
hy
-Original Message-
From: Paul Carver [mailto:pcar...@paulcarver.us]
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2016 7:25 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC
On Fri, 13 May 2016 17:13:59 -0700
"Armando M." wrote:
> On 1
community.
Thanks,
Cathy
From: Elzur, Uri [mailto:uri.el...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 3:02 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Armando M
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC
Hi Armando
As an industry we are working on SFC
Hi Armando
As an industry we are working on SFC for 3 years or so (more?). Still to date,
we are told we can’t get Neutron or even a Stadium project e.g. networking-SFC
to support NSH (in IETF LC phase) because OvS has not supported NSH. Is this an
official position of Neutron that OvS is the g
Can you pls add more detailed minutes as to emerging agreements/understandings?
Thx
Uri ("Oo-Ree")
C: 949-378-7568
-Original Message-
From: Akihiro Motoki [mailto:amot...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 11:50 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
interested
Thx
Uri ("Oo-Ree")
C: 949-378-7568
From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 11:05 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Congress] [Delegation] Meeting scheduling
Hi all,
The feedback on the
Hi Salvatore
Would like to discuss with you your views on what services are needed and when
and how to architect it etc
I’d like to meet in Palo Alto, maybe 11/19?
Thx
Uri (“Oo-Ree”)
C: 949-378-7568
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.o
Today, OpenStack makes placement decision mainly based on Compute demands
(Scheduler is part of Nova). It also uses some info provided about platform's
Compute capabilities. But for a given application (consists of some VMs, some
Network appliances, some storage etc), Nova/Scheduler has no way t
Don
Will there be a meeting next week? What is the regular time slot for the
meeting?
I'd like to work w you on a technical slide to use in Paris
Do we need to socialize the Gantt topic more?
Thx
Uri ("Oo-Ree")
C: 949-378-7568
From: Dugger, Donald D [mailto:donald.d.dug...@intel.com]
Sent: W
Don
When is the call?
Thx
Uri ("Oo-Ree")
C: 949-378-7568
-Original Message-
From: Dugger, Donald D [mailto:donald.d.dug...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 10:08 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [gantt] Scheduler gr
23 matches
Mail list logo
