Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo_messaging] Limiting the number of retries for kafka driver

onto the also_messaging. I will add a patch so that it would pick up from the configuration in oslo_messaging itself. Thanks & Regards, Cheran On 2/14/17, 9:32 PM, "Ken Giusti" <kgiu...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Elancheran Subramanian ><es

[openstack-dev] [oslo_messaging] Limiting the number of retries for kafka driver

Hello All, This is reg limiting the number of retries for Kafka driver support on Nova and Neutron. While trying out the oslo messaging notifications support for Kafka on Nova and Neutron, the Kafka driver doesn’t support limiting the number of retries for failed messages. When I checked the

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Should we drop kafka driver ?

On 11/30/16, 4:45 PM, "Joshua Harlow" wrote: >Mehdi Abaakouk wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I think my subject is clear :) , but I will add some facts that can help >> to the decision: >> * It uses only deprecated python-kafka API [1] [2] >> * It's not python3 compatible [3] >> * We

Re: [openstack-dev] Splitting notifications from rpc (and questions + work around this)

Hi Dims, Thanks for sharing… Just wanted to check whether there is any development for Nova and Neutron going on, which we can leverage? Thanks, Cheran On 11/3/16, 12:51 AM, "Davanum Srinivas" wrote: >Josh, > >Kirill Bespalov put together this doc of which components

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Running Tempest tests for a customized cloud

forward is to exclude those tests. -Punal On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Elancheran Subramanian <esubraman...@godaddy.com<mailto:esubraman...@godaddy.com>> wrote: Hello There, I’m currently playing with using Tempest as our integration tests for our internal and external cloud

[openstack-dev] [QA] Running Tempest tests for a customized cloud

Hello There, I’m currently playing with using Tempest as our integration tests for our internal and external clouds, facing some issues with api which are not supported in our cloud. For ex, listing domains isn’t supported for any user, due to this V3 Identity tests are failing. So I would like

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][horizon] Making a dashboard for Magnum - need a vote from the core team

Same here. I’m definitely interested in helping out but not sure how much time I can commit to. Will most definitely help out with reviews and other decision making process to help ensure magnum-ui is implemented and in the correct direction relating to Horizon. From: Thai Q Tran

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] FFE request for Firewall Router insertion BP

Dear Horizon community, I would like to request an FFE for the review we have out currently for the firewall feature in the project dashboard. The review is at - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162552/ This feature is very important for the neutron FWaaS community to move the firewall feature

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Question about behavior of override_settings

Hi, This has to do with a patch I have out for review currently - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90093/ I believe version 5 to be the proper solution for the problem with the unit tests that I am trying to fix. However based on some comments that asked me to try a couple things, version 7 is

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Help debugging js files

Hi, I need to make some changes to the horizon.instances.js file and I was wondering what the best method would be to help debug issues in this file? Is there a debugger or something available to debug this file separately? Thanks! Abishek ___

[openstack-dev] [Horizon][dashboards] Running the 'profile' specific unit tests

Hi all, Akihiro, I wanted to get a little feedback on the issue regarding the running of the dashboard unit tests with the cisco n1k profiles (and very soon the cisco DFA profiles) and more specifically how to have existing network and instance unit tests run both with and without profiles.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][dashboards] Running the 'profile' specific unit tests

accepts the profile_id yes? On 4/24/14 10:54 AM, Abishek Subramanian (absubram) absub...@cisco.com wrote: Hi all, Akihiro, I wanted to get a little feedback on the issue regarding the running of the dashboard unit tests with the cisco n1k profiles (and very soon the cisco DFA profiles) and more

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack/GSoC 2014 - Reviewing Applications

Davanum, are the scores private or is there a way to make them private? On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.comwrote: Dear Students, We received the following proposals: AMES-Cloud (Nagashree Bhat) A pre-caching system for OpenStack (Anastasis

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Regarding bug/bp https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1285298

Hi all, Akihiro, David, This is regarding the review for - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/76653/ Akihiro - Thanks for the review as always and as I mentioned in the review comment I completely agree with you. This is a small featurette. However this is small in that it adds to a chociefield

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] test_launch_instance_post questions

to always pick the first network when this particular test is run? Thanks! On 3/11/14 9:58 AM, Abishek Subramanian (absubram) absub...@cisco.com wrote: Hi, Can I please get some help with this UT? I am having a little issue with the nics argument - nics = [{net-id: netid, v4-fixed-ip: } I wish

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack/GSoC

Victoria, When you click My Dashboard on the left hand side, you will see Connections, Proposals etc on your right, in the dashboard. Right below Connections, there are two links in smaller font, one which is the link to Connect (circled in blue in the attached snapshot). If you tried right after

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] test_launch_instance_post questions

12:06 PM, Abishek Subramanian (absubram) absub...@cisco.com wrote: Hi, I had a couple of questions regarding this UT and the JS template that it ends up using. Hopefully someone can point me in the right direction and help me understand this a little better. I see that for this particular UT, we

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Edit subnet in workflows - ip_version hidden?

Hi, I had a question regarding the dashboards/project/networks/subnets/workflows.py file and in particular the portion of the ip_version field. It is marked as a hidden input field for the update subnet class with this note. # NOTE(amotoki): When 'disabled' attribute is set for the ChoiceField

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Edit subnet in workflows - ip_version hidden?

but the update side was forgotten about? On 3/11/14 11:30 AM, Radomir Dopieralski openst...@sheep.art.pl wrote: On 11/03/14 15:52, Abishek Subramanian (absubram) wrote: Hi, I had a question regarding the dashboards/project/networks/subnets/workflows.py file and in particular the portion

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack and GSoC 2014

Davanum, Now that students are in application phase, how can we mentors help them? Any meetings planned for the mentors to sync up on next steps. thanks, -Sriram On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Victoria Martínez de la Cruz victo...@vmartinezdelacruz.com wrote: So happy to hear that!

[openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Horizon] test_launch_instance_post questions

Hi, I had a couple of questions regarding this UT and the JS template that it ends up using. Hopefully someone can point me in the right direction and help me understand this a little better. I see that for this particular UT, we have a total of 3 networks in the network_list (the second network

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] FFE for vmdk-storage-policy-volume-type

Hi, https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/vmdk-storage-policy-volume-type . This is a blueprint that I am working on since Dec 2013 and as far I remember it was targetted to icehouse-3. Just today I noticed that it was moved to future, so should have feel through the cracks for core

[openstack-dev] [neutron][IPv6] Testing functionality of IPv6 modes using Horizon

Hi, I just wanted to find out if anyone had been able to test using Horizon? Was everything ok? Additionally wanted to confirm - the two modes can be updated too yes when using neutron subnet-update? Thanks! On 2/18/14 12:58 PM, Abishek Subramanian (absubram) absub...@cisco.com wrote: Hi

[openstack-dev] [neutron][IPv6] Testing functionality of IPv6 modes using Horizon

Hi shshang, all, I have some preliminary Horizon diffs available and if anyone would be kind enough to patch them and try to test the functionality, I'd really appreciate it. I know I'm able to create subnets successfully with the two modes but if there's anything else you'd like to test or have

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Multiple backends

I think you should look at the cinder scheduler code that selects a host based on the volume type. https://github.com/openstack/cinder/tree/master/cinder/scheduler. BTW, cinder dev tend to hang out on #openstack-cinder channel. Thanks, Subbu On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:35 AM, iKhan

[openstack-dev] [Openstack][Horizon] switchable switched classes in forms.py

Hi, I can see that the forms.py file can have parameters/inputs that are of class type switchable switched, i.e. this field 'B' will appear on the form if it's 'switched' based on a choice from a previous field 'A'. Then depending on the choice made for 'B', field 'C' will appear on the form.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] How to run pylint locally?

Thanks for the response Dirk. I see very similar output now as shown in the log when running 'tox -epylint', so I am getting closer. Unfortunately I am still not able to reproduce the failure shown here http://logs.openstack.org/17/62217/5/check/gate-cinder-pylint/1272f0a/console.html . What

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] How to run pylint locally?

I have a quick question on how to run the cinder-gate-pylint locally. I am trying to reproduce the pylint errors reported by the gate pylint build here (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/62217/) locally. Here is what I tried: /opt/stack/cinder $ ./tools/lintstack.sh But this does not report any

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack-dev Digest, Vol 22, Issue 27

Hi Shixiong, Thanks for the reply and clearing up my question! The document you've shared - they aren't the only possible combinations correct? Each of the two fields can have any one of these four values in any possible combination yes? Thanks! On 2/11/14 7:00 AM,

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] CLI for the new subnet keywords

Hi IPv6 experts, This is regarding the BP - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ipv6-two-attributes Is it possible to give me a quick example of the CLI that you envision? This is so that the Horizon BP can be updated accordingly. Once the neutron side of things is ready, when

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Security vulnerability contacts

Russell, (ccing Bryan, Rob) Thanks for the initiative. We at the OpenStack Security Group https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ossgare doing large part of these tasks now and are looking for more help (particularly around reviews from people that are intimate to the project internals). Here are some

[openstack-dev] [openstack]ASK: Summit talk on OpenStack on OpenStack/ OpenStack as a Service

Dear Stackers, I came across a proposed talk related to OpenStack on OpenStack/ OpenStack as a Service. Couldn't recollect if there were two different talks or the same. I am interested in learning more - could the speakers ping me offline please? -- Thanks, -Sriram

[openstack-dev] [OSSG] ASK - What is the regular OSSG IRC meetup schedule? #TIA

-- Thanks, -Sriram ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OSSG] ASK - What is the regular OSSG IRC meetup schedule? #TIA

, Sriram Subramanian sri...@sriramhere.com wrote: -- Thanks, -Sriram ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev