Re: [openstack-dev] [Cyborg]Queens PTL candidacy

ylight, OpenCompute Aficionado > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/m

Re: [openstack-dev] [cyborg]Nominate Rushil Chugh and Justin Kilpatrick as new core reviewers

+1 I haven't had time to actively participate these past months but have monitored and agree :) Thanks for your time Harm Sluiman harm.slui...@gmail.com > On May 25, 2017, at 10:24 AM, Zhipeng Huang <zhipengh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Team, > > This is an email for

Re: [openstack-dev] [acceleration] No team meeting today, resume next Wed

Thanks for the update. Unfortunately I could not attend and can't seem to find a summary or anything about what took place. A pointer would be appreciated please ;-) Thanks for your time Harm Sluiman harm.slui...@gmail.com > On Mar 8, 2017, at 7:22 AM, Zhipeng Huang <zhipengh...@gma

Re: [openstack-dev] [acceleration]Team Bi-weekly Meeting 2017.01.18 Agenda

om > Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen > > (Previous) > Research Assistant > Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 > University of California, Irvine > Email: zhipe...@uci.edu > Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 >

Re: [openstack-dev] [acceleration]Team Bi-weekly Meeting 2017.1.4 Agenda

to the etherpad >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cyborg-nasca-design >> >> >> >> Thank you, >> >> >> >> Miro Halas >> >> >> >> *From:* Harm Sluiman [mailto:harm.slui...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 04, 2017 9

Re: [openstack-dev] [acceleration]Team Bi-weekly Meeting 2017.1.4 Agenda

ologies Co,. Ltd > Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com > Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen > > (Previous) > Research Assistant > Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 > University of California, Irvine > Email: zhipe...@uci.edu > Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402

Re: [openstack-dev] [acceleration]Team Bi-weekly Meeting 2016.12.21 Agenda

; > Standard Engineer > IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line > Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd > Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com > Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen > > (Previous) > Research Assistant > Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 > Uni

Re: [openstack-dev] [acceleration]Team Biweekly Meeting 2016.11.23 agenda

wever we need a road map for each type of accelerator devices :) > > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Miroslav Halas <mha...@lenovo.com > <mailto:mha...@lenovo.com>> wrote: > Hello Harm, > > > > Thank you for sharing. I was wondering if you have given any t

Re: [openstack-dev] [acceleration]Team Biweekly Meeting 2016.11.23 agenda

Ng and Li Liu, my colleagues from Huawei that will be participating in Cyborg and helping get our initial POC underway Thanks for your time. 宋哲 Harm Sluiman > On Nov 23, 2016, at 11:49 PM, Zhipeng Huang <zhipengh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi team, > > Thanks for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [acceleration]Team Biweekly Meeting 2016.11.10 minutes

nt/IT Prooduct Line > Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd > Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com > Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen > > (Previous) > Research Assistant > Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 > University of California, Irvine > Email: zhipe...@

Re: [openstack-dev] FPGA as a dynamic nested resources

> On Jul 28, 2016, at 7:57 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > > On 07/19/2016 06:51 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: >> On Jul 19, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Chris Friesen >> wrote: Why would a VM program the slot? Wouldn’t it usually be at the host level? >>> >>> Are

Re: [openstack-dev] FPGA as a dynamic nested resources

On Jul 21, 2016 5:12 AM, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 07:54:48AM +0200, Roman Dobosz wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:07:12 +0100 > > "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: > > > > Hey Daniel, thanks for the feedback. > > > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Please vote -> Removal of Harm Weites from the core reviewer team

ride :) see you in #kolla! > Op 15 jan. 2016, om 20:10 heeft Steven Dake (stdake) <std...@cisco.com> het > volgende geschreven: > > I counted 6 votes in favor of removal. We have 10 people on our core team. > A majority has been met and I have removed Harm from t

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposing Michal Rostecki for Core Reviewer (nihilfer on IRC)

+1 :) Jeff Peeler schreef op 2015-11-13 19:51: On 12/11/15 08:41, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Hey folks, Its been awhile since we have had a core reviewer nomination, but I really feel like Michal has the right stuff. If you look at the 30 day stats for kolla[1] , he is #3 in reviews (70

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Integrating kollacli as python-kollaclient

+1 this sort of stuff makes live a lot better :) Swapnil Kulkarni schreef op 2015-10-23 07:08: On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Hello Folks, Oracle has developed a CLI tool for managing OpenStack Kolla clusters.  Several months ago at our

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] proposing Michal Jastrzebski (inc0) for core reviewer

Looks like he passed 3 already, but here's another +1 :) Steven Dake (stdake) schreef op 2015-09-30 00:20: Hi folks, I am proposing Michal for core reviewer. Consider my proposal as a +1 vote. Michal has done a fantastic job with rsyslog, has done a nice job overall contributing to the project

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Followup to review in gerrit relating to RHOS + RDO types

e Kolla community does not support any deployment of OpenStack.  To the question as posed, how many we add, the answer is it is really up to community members willing to  implement and maintain the work.  In this case, I have personally stepped up to implement RHOS and maintain it going forward.

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposing Swapnil Kulkarni (coolsvap) for kolla core reviewer team

great! +1 :) Op 14-08-15 om 15:38 schreef Paul Bourke: +1, Swapnil has made a ton of useful contributions and continues to do so :) On 14/08/15 14:29, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Hi folks, Swapnil has done a bunch of great technical work, participates heavily in IRC, and has contributed

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][magnum] Removal of Daneyon Hansen from the Core Reviewer team for Kolla

Agreed, everyone should do what they love - so I wish you the best of luck with the Magnum crew Daneyon! Op 22-07-15 om 22:47 schreef Steven Dake (stdake): Fellow Kolla developers, Daneyon has been instrumental in getting Kolla rolling and keeping our project alive. He even found me a new

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposal for Paul Bourke for Kolla Core

no-brainer: +1 Op 14-07-15 om 13:19 schreef Ryan Hallisey: +1 I echo all the prior comments. -Ryan - Original Message - From: Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Monday, July

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposal for new core-reviewer Harm Waites

Thanks guys, both for all the nice words and the acceptance! harmw Op 16-06-15 om 16:32 schreef Steven Dake (stdake): Its unanimous! Welcome to the core reviewer team Harm! Regards -steve From: Steven Dake std...@cisco.com mailto:std...@cisco.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposal for changing 1600UTC meeting to 1700 UTC

I'm ok with moving to 16:30 UTC instead of staying at 16:00. I actually prefer it in my evening schedule :) Moving to 16:30 would already be a great improvement to the current schedule and should at least allow me to not miss everything. - harmw Op 12-06-15 om 15:44 schreef Steven Dake

Re: [openstack-dev] ipv6 and ipv4 dual stack for floating IP

]['ip_address'], prefixlen) Operations with just 1 (ipv6) ip go without any issues, the adress is added to a namespace and pongs just fine. Adding 2 subnets to this external net and creating a gateway to it on the l3 router causes a problem. Do we need to wait for K before we can fully go dual-stack? - Harm

Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

Hi Dane, Just wondering if you've made some progression on the matter :) Regards, Harm op 19-08-14 19:08, Dane Leblanc (leblancd) schreef: Hi Harm: Unfortunately I haven't had time to complete the changes yet. Even if/when these changes are completed, it's unlikely that this blueprint

Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

for that yet Dane? Regards, Harm op 16-08-14 23:33, Martinx - ? schreef: Guys, Just for the record, I'm using IceHouse in a Dual-Stacked environment (with security groups working) but, Instance's IPv6 address are static (no upstream SLAAC, arrived in Juno-2, I think) and the topology is `VLAN

[openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

-subnets-on-gateway-port Regards, Harm ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

Hi Dane, Thanks, that looks promising. Once support for multiple v6 addresses on gateway ports is added I'll be happy to give this a go. Should it work just fine with an otherwise Icehouse based deployment? Regards, Harm op 16-08-14 20:31, Dane Leblanc (leblancd) schreef: Hi Harm: Can you