I understand that, but your question was about requesting an FFE for
this spec, which you wouldn't need to do if you just targeted it to
10.0.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 01:39:08PM +0300, Evgeniy L wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> The thing is it may not require changes in Fuel for 10.0 too, ideally we
> wou
Hi Dmitry,
The thing is it may not require changes in Fuel for 10.0 too, ideally we
would like to add a couple of new gates to OpenStack infra, so they will be
enabled for external extensions when there are any.
Thanks,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> If the spec is
If the spec is not going to require code changes in 9.0/Mitaka, why not
simply target it for 10.0/Newton?
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 05:21:55PM +0300, Evgeniy L wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a spec where we are trying to do research and describe how we are
> going to test extensions [0], we will not be a
Hi,
We have a spec where we are trying to do research and describe how we are
going to test extensions [0], we will not be able to land it before feature
freeze, so should we get feature freeze exception for it? Or it will not be
a problem to merge it even after FF?
The spec itself is more about
