Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][Heat][TripleO] Heat artifact type

2016-07-20 Thread Fox, Kevin M
From: Mikhail Fedosin [mfedo...@mirantis.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 6:58 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][Heat][TripleO] Heat artifact type On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Qiming Teng <t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][Heat][TripleO] Heat artifact type

2016-07-20 Thread Randall Burt
FWIW, option 2 is almost required unless we plan to be able to bundle multiple environments with a single template. While having a single environment for a single template can be useful, the even *more* useful scenario (and the primary one driving the development of environments initially) is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][Heat][TripleO] Heat artifact type

2016-07-20 Thread Mikhail Fedosin
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Qiming Teng wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 06:44:06PM +0300, Oleksii Chuprykov wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Today it was announced that Glare is ready for public review > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][Heat][TripleO] Heat artifact type

2016-07-19 Thread Qiming Teng
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 06:44:06PM +0300, Oleksii Chuprykov wrote: > Hello! > > Today it was announced that Glare is ready for public review > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-July/099553.html So > we are ready to start working on integration Heat with Glare and >

[openstack-dev] [Glare][Heat][TripleO] Heat artifact type

2016-07-19 Thread Oleksii Chuprykov
Hello! Today it was announced that Glare is ready for public review http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-July/099553.html So we are ready to start working on integration Heat with Glare and implementing a POC. After discussions with Glare team we see two design options: 1)