From: Mikhail Fedosin [mfedo...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 6:58 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][Heat][TripleO] Heat artifact type
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Qiming Teng
<t
FWIW, option 2 is almost required unless we plan to be able to bundle multiple
environments with a single template. While having a single environment for a
single template can be useful, the even *more* useful scenario (and the primary
one driving the development of environments initially) is
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Qiming Teng
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 06:44:06PM +0300, Oleksii Chuprykov wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > Today it was announced that Glare is ready for public review
> >
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 06:44:06PM +0300, Oleksii Chuprykov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Today it was announced that Glare is ready for public review
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-July/099553.html So
> we are ready to start working on integration Heat with Glare and
>
Hello!
Today it was announced that Glare is ready for public review
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-July/099553.html So
we are ready to start working on integration Heat with Glare and
implementing a POC. After discussions with Glare team we see two design
options:
1)