Hi,
In convergence, we discuss about having concurrent updates to a stack. I
wanted to know if it is safe to assume that the an update will be a
super set of it's previous updates. Understanding this is critical to
arrive at implementation of concurrent stack operations.
Assuming that an admin wi
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Anant Patil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In convergence, we discuss about having concurrent updates to a stack. I
> wanted to know if it is safe to assume that the an update will be a
> super set of it's previous updates. Understanding this is critical to
> arrive at implemen
Excerpts from Angus Salkeld's message of 2014-09-22 20:31:46 -0700:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Anant Patil wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > In convergence, we discuss about having concurrent updates to a stack. I
> > wanted to know if it is safe to assume that the an update will be a
> > super se
On 22/09/14 11:04, Anant Patil wrote:
Hi,
In convergence, we discuss about having concurrent updates to a stack. I
wanted to know if it is safe to assume that the an update will be a
super set of it's previous updates. Understanding this is critical to
arrive at implementation of concurrent stac
